Ping
The court has decided to vote “Present”, just like the role model, Zer0.
“The case was filed against Obama, Congress and others just before Obama was sworn into office, arguing that Obama was a British subject and not a U.S. citizen.”
Kinda contradicts their assertion that NO ONE argued with Obama’s citizenship status BEFORE he was sworn in.
Please..don’t you know that a Xerox copy of a newspaper birth announcement is all you need for proof of natural born citizenship??
The citizens of this country no longer have “standing” in a court system and government controlled by the self appointed elites.
These judges are as arrogant as Obama and the members of Congress who attempt to silence the questions of citizens attending town hall meetings.
Another act of war against America by the judiciary.
It seems that no one with any authority will ask for proof that Obama is constitutionally eligible to be President and Obama won't tell us with an actual birth certificate.
What is it about discovery that is so frightening to so many judges?
All this yapping, Where is the judge who just says - show me the damn thing and be done with it.
Cowards. While I’m at it - Generals ????? Why did you go so far in rank anyways ? Housing, cars, lunch table? Oath??
Guess not.
Once the electoral college votes for a president, that person is president elect, and will assume the office when sworn in. There are no constitutional mechanisms for a court to interfere in that process. If the electoral college had decided to elect Al Gore as president, instead of George Bush, that would have been constitutional. They could elect the cleaning lady, no matter her citizenship or age, if they so choose.
Like everything, there is a balance to this power. The electoral college can select, the congress can eject. Congress doesn't even, however, have standing to demand the birth certificate, but a refusal to comply with the request can be taken into account if there were to be an impeachment bill contemplated, and then voted upon in the Senate.
Our ire shouldn't be directed at Obama’s hiding of something likely embarrassing, as I'm pretty convinced that it is something pretty minor, but more at the 50 secretaries of state who failed to find out if Obama was constitutionally permitted to be on their ballots. Not just once in the primary, but also in the general. At least some of them have to be those who believe in the constitution, and I really want to know how they sat on their hands and asked for less proof of identity than I have to give the DMV to get a driver's license.
To summarize: Congress has to ask for the birth certificate, and we need to nail each and every one of these secretaries of state to the wall to ensure that they get the same proof of identity from those running for ANY office that we have to submit to DMV to get a driver's license.
ping
Unfortunately this won’t be covered anywhere but it actually speaks volumes to the truth of the matter.
They know they can’t let the birth certificate out in the open because it can’t be proved that he is a natural born citizen.
This is truly amazing...
Behaving just like every other member of the Judicial branch that has “dealt” with ZERO eligibility issue - run away and ignore the merit of the complaint.
"At this time he was still a private individual who had the burden of proving that he satisfied each and every element of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. That plaintiffs filed their action at this time is important for it not only sets the time by which we are to judge when their standing attached to their action against Obama, Congress and the other defendants … but also to show that Obama has the burden of proof to show that he is a 'natural born citizen' and satisfied the other requirements of Article II," Apuzzo wrote earlier.
"At no time in these proceedings or in any other of the many cases that have been filed against him throughout the country has Obama produced a 1961 contemporaneous birth certificate from the state of Hawaii showing that he was born there. ... We must conclude for purposes of defendants' motion that since Obama is not a 14th Amendment 'Citizen of the United States' let alone an Article II 'natural born citizen,' he is not eligible to be president and commander in chief. Not being eligible to be president and commander in chief he is currently acting as such without constitutional authority. It is Obama's exercising the singular and great powers of the president and commander in chief without constitutional authority which is causing plaintiffs' injury in fact," he wrote.
Well said, Mario. This needs to be said again and again until the heads of the Obamabots who litter this forum and the countryside implode from their usual prefabrications and equivocations.
The Texas 2 step is a goin’ on...can’t ask for $$$’s, the attorney would then have the right for discovery....