Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What 7 Republicans Could Do (Tom Friedman looking for "heroic GOPers" to help pass energy bill)
New York Slimes ^ | 07/21/2010 | Thomas Friedman

Posted on 07/21/2010 10:17:47 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The hour is late, but there is still a sliver of time to pass a serious energy bill out of this Congress. To do so, though, would require President Obama to rustle up votes with a passion that he has failed to exhibit up to now, and, more importantly, it would require at least seven Republican senators to put the national interest above party and politics. Yes, I know that is all unlikely. You can laugh now. But just remember this: If we don’t get a serious energy bill out of this Congress, and Republicans retake the House and Senate, we may not have another shot until the next presidential term or until we get a “perfect storm” — a climate or energy crisis that is awful enough to finally end our debate on these issues but not so awful as to end the world. But, hey, by 2012, China should pretty much own the clean-tech industry and we’ll at least be able to get some good deals on electric cars.

The energy bill now being discussed in the Senate — which would raise energy-efficiency standards, require utilities to get 15 percent or more of their power from renewable sources, like wind and solar, and create a limited cap on carbon emissions from power plants — is already watered down just to get 53 or so Democratic votes. But at least it gets us started on ending our addiction to oil and mitigating climate change. Unfortunately, right now it is not clear that a single Republican senator will even vote for this watered-down bill.

That is pathetic. Rather than think seriously about our endless dependence on oil, the G.O.P. has focused its energies on making “climate change” a four-letter word

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energybill; republicans; tomfriedman; wizardofsmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 07/21/2010 10:17:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Tom Friedman’s argument as to why the energy bill should be supported ....


The energy bill now being discussed in the Senate — which would raise energy-efficiency standards, require utilities to get 15 percent or more of their power from renewable sources, like wind and solar, and create a limited cap on carbon emissions from power plants — is already watered down just to get 53 or so Democratic votes. But at least it gets us started on ending our addiction to oil and mitigating climate change. Unfortunately, right now it is not clear that a single Republican senator will even vote for this watered-down bill.

That is pathetic. Rather than think seriously about our endless dependence on oil, the G.O.P. has focused its energies on making “climate change” a four-letter word and labeling any Democrat who supports legislation that would in any way raise energy prices to diminish our dependence on oil as a “carbon taxer.”

Unfortunately, Obama and the Democrats never effectively fought back. They should have said: “O.K., you Republicans don’t believe in global warming? Fine. Forget about global warming. That’s between you and your beach house. How about this? Do you believe in population growth? Do you believe in the American dream? Because, according to the U.N., the world’s population is going to grow from roughly 6.7 billion people today to about 9.2 billion by 2050. And in today’s integrated world, more and more of those 9.2 billion will aspire to, and be able to, live like Americans — with American-size cars, homes and Big Macs. In that world, demand for fossil fuels is going to go through the roof — and all the bad things that go with it.

“If we take that threat seriously now and pass an energy bill that begins to end our oil addiction, we can shrink the piles of money we send to the worst regimes in the world, strengthen our dollar by keeping more at home, clean up our air, take away money from the people who finance the mosques and madrassas that keep many Muslim youths backward, angry and anti-American and stimulate a whole new industry — one China is already leapfrogging us on — clean-tech. Nothing would improve our economic and national security more, yet Republicans won’t lift one finger to make it happen.


2 posted on 07/21/2010 10:19:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thomas Friedman doesn’t have the brains to pour pee out of a boot; he’d have trouble with that even if the instructions were written on the bottom of the heel.

But boy can he write! And write. And write. And write. And write and write and write. And write. And write. And write some more! And write. And write...


3 posted on 07/21/2010 10:20:23 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They only need to find three. Snowe, Graham, Collins and Brown can’t wait to support it, I am sure.


4 posted on 07/21/2010 10:21:29 AM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Tom Friedman, pathetic hypocrite. Hey Tom, give back your ill gotten salary and sell your home(s), ride a bike to work from your new 80 square foot apartment and maybe we'll listen to you as being serious....

or not..........

5 posted on 07/21/2010 10:23:18 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The world will want to live like Americans who largely produced their wealth using fossil fuels. So when this happens it will drive up the price of fossil fuels. Therefore we should artificially raise the price of fossil fuels for ourselves so we’ll use less so the rest of the world gets cheaper oil? This just doesn’t make sense. Instead, why not let the market dictate the price. If it goes up as Friedman predicts that will be more than enough incentive for wind mills and solar panels. Besides weren’t we told there really wasn’t enough oil off shore to bother pumping? Who would have thought it could have gushed and gushed and gushed? In the 70s many learned experts told me we’d be all out by now.


6 posted on 07/21/2010 10:32:37 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
the G.O.P. has focused its energies on making “climate change” a four-letter word

FUBO

7 posted on 07/21/2010 10:36:53 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Even the earth is bipolar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Thomas....When society collapses, we're coming to take everything you have. Enjoy it while you can.
8 posted on 07/21/2010 10:37:11 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Do most Americansheeple actually understand the dire implications of such an energy bill being passed? Do they even care? Apparently not given the sheer and utter dire garbage legislation the libtard Dems and Progressives have literally shoved down our collective throats. I have said it multiple times before and I will assert such again: It will take decades to fix what this lamearse, Jack Squat IdiotPOTUS and his idiot-ridden administration has literally phucked up under the rhetorical guise of 'hope and change', etc. =.=
9 posted on 07/21/2010 10:37:43 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

52 Democrat Senators can’t pass this bill, and it’s the fault of the Republicans?


10 posted on 07/21/2010 10:40:02 AM PDT by FLCowboy, (And people thought Jimmy Carter was our worst president........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: khenrich

I guess that bad, bad GOP is playing their tricksy tricks on the stupid American public... or so Friedman thinks.


11 posted on 07/21/2010 10:43:53 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What a red herring. All the possible sources of wind and solar power couldn’t make a teacup of a difference. How about nuclear power, Tom? Or were liberals such as yourself to busy making nuclear a four letter word? Just between you and your beach house, Tom, nuclear is the correct way to proceed as we continue to explore for more sources of oil, or shale, or coal.

Why can’t we use coal or shale, Tom? Because of globull warming, right?


12 posted on 07/21/2010 10:44:23 AM PDT by Obadiah (I can see November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: khenrich

The Rats have 59 seats.

Let them pass it.


13 posted on 07/21/2010 10:45:13 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound
The Rats have 59 seats. Let them pass it.

Exactly. Why can't they ram it down our throats like ObamaCare? All this bellyaching from Obama and liberals about how the Republicans are the Party of "no" and are obstructionists. The corrupt MSM never calls them on the fact that they don't need a SINGLE Republican vote to pass anything their heart fancies. So how can Republicans block anything?

14 posted on 07/21/2010 10:53:32 AM PDT by Obadiah (I can see November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
You have got to be sick in the head. If that bill were to be passed the first thing that would happen would be the price of energy would double. How does $600.00 dollars a month to cool a small home strike you. Utility companies are in business to make money, and lots of it. They have a captive clientele. Check into The Smart Meter and learn about how it will actually be used.
15 posted on 07/21/2010 10:56:29 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (Leyte Gulf Beach Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

The reason I worry about a GOP Majority is because Obama will then have a foil.

It worked great for Reagan and Clinton.


16 posted on 07/21/2010 10:58:11 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Friedman is being fundamentally dishonest. He dispenses with the global warming justification for this boondoggle, and proceeds to give a lo of other supposed benefits of a green energy program, from lower prices, decreased dependence on foreign sources, and increased international competitiveness.

But all of these goals could be simply and reliably achieved by simply reducing the restrictions on domestic energy production. Our energy is artificially expensive, because we restrict so much of our natural resources.

There is no need to take a chance that higher taxes might cripple our economy in order to acheive Friedman’s supposed goals. Just open up our natural resource lands, and we’re there...


17 posted on 07/21/2010 11:01:14 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (There are 10 kinds of people: Those who get binary math, and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Friedman is being fundamentally dishonest. He dispenses with the global warming justification for this boondoggle, and proceeds to give a lo of other supposed benefits of a green energy program, from lower prices, decreased dependence on foreign sources, and increased international competitiveness.

But all of these goals could be simply and reliably achieved by simply reducing the restrictions on domestic energy production. Our energy is artificially expensive, because we restrict so much of our natural resources.

There is no need to take a chance that higher taxes might cripple our economy in order to acheive Friedman’s supposed goals. Just open up our natural resource lands, and we’re there...


18 posted on 07/21/2010 11:01:19 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (There are 10 kinds of people: Those who get binary math, and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Thomas Friedman's ignorance and stupidity continue to amaze me. This guy is dumber than a box of rocks. And that's an insult to rocks. He is just one of the reasons the NY Times is a joke.
19 posted on 07/21/2010 11:03:25 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

When has the Slimes ever not been a joke?


20 posted on 07/21/2010 11:07:21 AM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson