Posted on 07/21/2010 10:17:47 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The hour is late, but there is still a sliver of time to pass a serious energy bill out of this Congress. To do so, though, would require President Obama to rustle up votes with a passion that he has failed to exhibit up to now, and, more importantly, it would require at least seven Republican senators to put the national interest above party and politics. Yes, I know that is all unlikely. You can laugh now. But just remember this: If we don’t get a serious energy bill out of this Congress, and Republicans retake the House and Senate, we may not have another shot until the next presidential term or until we get a “perfect storm” — a climate or energy crisis that is awful enough to finally end our debate on these issues but not so awful as to end the world. But, hey, by 2012, China should pretty much own the clean-tech industry and we’ll at least be able to get some good deals on electric cars.
The energy bill now being discussed in the Senate — which would raise energy-efficiency standards, require utilities to get 15 percent or more of their power from renewable sources, like wind and solar, and create a limited cap on carbon emissions from power plants — is already watered down just to get 53 or so Democratic votes. But at least it gets us started on ending our addiction to oil and mitigating climate change. Unfortunately, right now it is not clear that a single Republican senator will even vote for this watered-down bill.
That is pathetic. Rather than think seriously about our endless dependence on oil, the G.O.P. has focused its energies on making “climate change” a four-letter word
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Tom Friedman’s argument as to why the energy bill should be supported ....
The energy bill now being discussed in the Senate — which would raise energy-efficiency standards, require utilities to get 15 percent or more of their power from renewable sources, like wind and solar, and create a limited cap on carbon emissions from power plants — is already watered down just to get 53 or so Democratic votes. But at least it gets us started on ending our addiction to oil and mitigating climate change. Unfortunately, right now it is not clear that a single Republican senator will even vote for this watered-down bill.
That is pathetic. Rather than think seriously about our endless dependence on oil, the G.O.P. has focused its energies on making “climate change” a four-letter word and labeling any Democrat who supports legislation that would in any way raise energy prices to diminish our dependence on oil as a “carbon taxer.”
Unfortunately, Obama and the Democrats never effectively fought back. They should have said: “O.K., you Republicans don’t believe in global warming? Fine. Forget about global warming. That’s between you and your beach house. How about this? Do you believe in population growth? Do you believe in the American dream? Because, according to the U.N., the world’s population is going to grow from roughly 6.7 billion people today to about 9.2 billion by 2050. And in today’s integrated world, more and more of those 9.2 billion will aspire to, and be able to, live like Americans — with American-size cars, homes and Big Macs. In that world, demand for fossil fuels is going to go through the roof — and all the bad things that go with it.
“If we take that threat seriously now and pass an energy bill that begins to end our oil addiction, we can shrink the piles of money we send to the worst regimes in the world, strengthen our dollar by keeping more at home, clean up our air, take away money from the people who finance the mosques and madrassas that keep many Muslim youths backward, angry and anti-American and stimulate a whole new industry — one China is already leapfrogging us on — clean-tech. Nothing would improve our economic and national security more, yet Republicans won’t lift one finger to make it happen.
Thomas Friedman doesn’t have the brains to pour pee out of a boot; he’d have trouble with that even if the instructions were written on the bottom of the heel.
But boy can he write! And write. And write. And write. And write and write and write. And write. And write. And write some more! And write. And write...
They only need to find three. Snowe, Graham, Collins and Brown can’t wait to support it, I am sure.
or not..........
The world will want to live like Americans who largely produced their wealth using fossil fuels. So when this happens it will drive up the price of fossil fuels. Therefore we should artificially raise the price of fossil fuels for ourselves so we’ll use less so the rest of the world gets cheaper oil? This just doesn’t make sense. Instead, why not let the market dictate the price. If it goes up as Friedman predicts that will be more than enough incentive for wind mills and solar panels. Besides weren’t we told there really wasn’t enough oil off shore to bother pumping? Who would have thought it could have gushed and gushed and gushed? In the 70s many learned experts told me we’d be all out by now.
FUBO
52 Democrat Senators can’t pass this bill, and it’s the fault of the Republicans?
I guess that bad, bad GOP is playing their tricksy tricks on the stupid American public... or so Friedman thinks.
What a red herring. All the possible sources of wind and solar power couldn’t make a teacup of a difference. How about nuclear power, Tom? Or were liberals such as yourself to busy making nuclear a four letter word? Just between you and your beach house, Tom, nuclear is the correct way to proceed as we continue to explore for more sources of oil, or shale, or coal.
Why can’t we use coal or shale, Tom? Because of globull warming, right?
The Rats have 59 seats.
Let them pass it.
Exactly. Why can't they ram it down our throats like ObamaCare? All this bellyaching from Obama and liberals about how the Republicans are the Party of "no" and are obstructionists. The corrupt MSM never calls them on the fact that they don't need a SINGLE Republican vote to pass anything their heart fancies. So how can Republicans block anything?
The reason I worry about a GOP Majority is because Obama will then have a foil.
It worked great for Reagan and Clinton.
Friedman is being fundamentally dishonest. He dispenses with the global warming justification for this boondoggle, and proceeds to give a lo of other supposed benefits of a green energy program, from lower prices, decreased dependence on foreign sources, and increased international competitiveness.
But all of these goals could be simply and reliably achieved by simply reducing the restrictions on domestic energy production. Our energy is artificially expensive, because we restrict so much of our natural resources.
There is no need to take a chance that higher taxes might cripple our economy in order to acheive Friedman’s supposed goals. Just open up our natural resource lands, and we’re there...
Friedman is being fundamentally dishonest. He dispenses with the global warming justification for this boondoggle, and proceeds to give a lo of other supposed benefits of a green energy program, from lower prices, decreased dependence on foreign sources, and increased international competitiveness.
But all of these goals could be simply and reliably achieved by simply reducing the restrictions on domestic energy production. Our energy is artificially expensive, because we restrict so much of our natural resources.
There is no need to take a chance that higher taxes might cripple our economy in order to acheive Friedman’s supposed goals. Just open up our natural resource lands, and we’re there...
When has the Slimes ever not been a joke?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.