[brytlea]

Well, the evidence is that either she or the farmer’s wife are not telling the truth.
SHE said she sent him to “one of his own” a white lawyer.
Apparently, the wife says she gave them 2 potential lawyers, one white one black, they went with the white one because he was closer to them.
These stories do not jibe. Of course, perhaps that’s because the stories are about two different people. I have not seen anything yet that explains how we are to know this is the same white farmer she mentions in her story.
Also, and I noticed even Brett left it out tonight on Fox, she said it was not about black and white, well,( (but then in the same breath says) yes it is about black and white. So, which his it?

[Gondring]

I have not seen anything yet that explains how we are to know this is the same white farmer she mentions in her story.

If what she's saying is true, then there's not necessarily a contradiction. Remember that the tape was edited.

She mentioned the revelation that it wasn't about race BEFORE she delivers the "one of his own" line.

[APatientMan]

Valid question. Also, when it comes to her revelation that it’s really all about the haves and have-nots - how does she determine which is which? What’s the income level that determines who has enough to her?

[lonestar]

I believe eventually the white lawwyer had to withdraw from their case because he had another case taking up a lot of his time. Whether they then went with the black lawyer, I don't know.

The farmer's widow agrees with her...they become friends.

[gogeo]

SHE said she sent him to “one of his own” a white lawyer...

Does that mean the farmer was also a lawyer?