If what she's saying is true, then there's not necessarily a contradiction. Remember that the tape was edited.
She mentioned the revelation that it wasn't about race BEFORE she delivers the "one of his own" line.
I will have to go by memory, however, she basically said she sent him to one of his how because she thought that was an ok thing to do. She wanted to give him enough help so that he could go back to whichever Ag dept sent him to her, and tell them she helped him (ie, she wanted not to get into to trouble, or keep her job, or get more referrals, or something). Nowhere does she indicate she gave him a choice of a black lawyer. I don’t see how that was edited out, but I’m open to explanation.
The whole *revelation* part was a little jumbled, it was a little difficult to exactly understand what she was trying to say as it was not one coherent sentence. I wish I had a transcript, but she basically says in that part that she had a revelation that it was about poor and those who were not, it wasn’t about black and white. HOWEVER she then backtracks and says, well yes, it IS about black and white. I don’t know how we are to figure exactly what she thinks about the races, and unless there is a more coherent explanation that wasn’t on the tape released, I don’t see how she shows that she changed her racist outlook from that story.
Who says the tape was edited? Did Brietbart say that or is this just what the NAACP is saying? They say they have the full tape, then why hasn't it been released yet if it would show her in a better light? There is no evidence this woman is telling the truth but the tape speaks volumes. The audience was racist to the core and so is she.