Posted on 07/10/2010 1:01:59 PM PDT by nhungerford
Racist eugenicist and Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger would be so proud:
"According to the city Health Department, 2008 saw 89,469 abortions performed in New York City seven for every 10 live births. Among black women, abortions out number live births by three to two."
These statistics from New York City more closely resemble the abortion mill culture of post-communist countries like China and Russia (who have historically devalued the worth of individual human life in favor of the collective good), than the old Clintonian mantra, safe, legal and rare.
I realize that many people, liberal and otherwise, are proponents of abortion choice, but the situation in New York City raises important ethical questions on the consequences of this perspective: Even if one is in favor of legalized abortion, does such a person want to live in a society in which more people are aborted than born? My guess is that most people do not. Secondly, if the answer is indeed no, how do we avoid this situation? A system which merely offers abortion as an alternative cannot discriminate between what pro-choice people deem as acceptable reasons for abortion and say, a woman who wants to use it as birth control. You have to allow them all.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...
Medicaid does not pay for abortion on demand but will pay in case of rape or incest or the ol danger to mother. I t may be tht NYC docs fake the danger to Mother angle
hard to know how to feel about this though since it reduces the numver on lifelong welfare
It's why they were ga-ga over Obummer to begin with.
Looks like LBJ’s Great Society program is making progress in destroying the Black community.
Welfare = the government’s soft war on humanity.
The Klan was also primarily formed to kill Republicans...many of whom were black.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVzJ2RIlUwE
So.....the democrats insist on killing future generations of democrats off?
I dont know about nonprescription birth control, but Medicaid most certainly pays for prescription birth control pills. Yet this situation persists.
If you removed the added child welfare benefits that ratio would be much different. 100 to 1?
Another reason for african-americans to rethink their 90%+ vote for the Marxist Dems?
Planned Parenthood does it’s best to hide it’s history, but their magazine carried a series of articles by one of the higher ups in the Third Reich during the 1930s. It’s easy to find online, but I don’t have time to look it up now.
Can we get NASA to reach out to the women who want to kill their babies? Maybe educate these women as to how important babies (that eventually become adults) are to science and math.
2007 - births out of wedlock in 2007
72 percent black
51 percent Hispanic
28 percent white
Now this IS irony. The left worked for 60 years to destroy the black race, deliberately creating an ignorant, welfare dependent voting bloc. And what is the left doing? Killing off 70% of their upcoming voter base!! Anyone still wonder why it’s so important to turn Mexicans into American voters? Leftists/democrats designed it so that blacks had little more to do than BREED, yet in spite of their expertise at doing just that, in staggering numbers and without the “detriment” of family or marriage, more are being lost than are turned into democrat voters! Mike Savage is right. Liberalism is indeed a MENTAL DISORDER.
the positive side to this news is that it has helped keep the crime rate down, per Freakonomics.
Both groups historically have been heavily supported by Democrats. Coincidence?
AND TO THINK THAT HIILARY ADMIRES THIS WOMAN...
On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
“...human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ‘spawning... human beings who never should have been born.” Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial “purification,” couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.
On the right of married couples to bear children:
Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she wrote in her “Plan for Peace.” Birth Control Review, April 1932
On the purpose of birth control:
The purpose in promoting birth control was “to create a race of thoroughbreds,” she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)
On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
“More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief aim of birth control.” Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
On religious convictions regarding sex outside of marriage:
“This book aims to answer the needs expressed in thousands on thousands of letters to me in the solution of marriage problems... Knowledge of sex truths frankly and plainly presented cannot possibly injure healthy, normal, young minds. Concealment, suppression, futile attempts to veil the unveilable - these work injury, as they seldom succeed and only render those who indulge in them ridiculous. For myself, I have full confidence in the cleanliness, the open-mindedness, the promise of the younger generation.” Margaret Sanger, Happiness in Marriage (Bretano’s, New York, 1927)
On the extermination of blacks:
“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” she said, “if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon
On respecting the rights of the mentally ill:
In her “Plan for Peace,” Sanger outlined her strategy for eradication of those she deemed “feebleminded.” Among the steps included in her evil scheme were immigration restrictions; compulsory sterilization; segregation to a lifetime of farm work; etc. Birth Control Review, April 1932, p. 107
On adultery:
A woman’s physical satisfaction was more important than any marriage vow, Sanger believed. Birth Control in America, p. 11
On marital sex:
“The marriage bed is the most degenerating influence in the social order,” Sanger said. (p. 23) [Quite the opposite of God’s view on the matter: “Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled; but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.” (Hebrews 13:4)
On abortion:
“Criminal’ abortions arise from a perverted sex relationship under the stress of economic necessity, and their greatest frequency is among married women.” The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.
On the YMCA and YWCA:
“...brothels of the Spirit and morgues of Freedom!”), The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.
On the Catholic Church’s view of contraception:
“...enforce SUBJUGATION by TURNING WOMAN INTO A MERE INCUBATOR.” The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.
On motherhood:
“I cannot refrain from saying that women must come to recognize there is some function of womanhood other than being a child-bearing machine.” What Every Girl Should Know, by Margaret Sanger (Max Maisel, Publisher, 1915) [Jesus said: “Daughters of Jerusalem, weep... for your children. For, behold, the days are coming, in which they shall say, Blessed (happy) are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the breasts which never gave suck.” (Luke 23:24)]
“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
Editor of The Birth Control Review from 1917 to 1938.
Founder of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the world.
Her goal in life:
Sanger admitted her entire life’s purpose was to promote birth control. An Autobiography, p. 194
Helped to establish the research bureau that financed “the pill,” she contributed toward the work of the German doctor who developed the IUD. “Ernst Graefenberg and His Ring,” Mt. Sinai Journal of Medicine, July-Aug. 1975, p. 345, in Margaret Sanger: Father of Modern Society, by Elasah Drogin
Sanger espoused the thinking of eugenicists — similar to Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” — but related the concept to human society, saying the genetic makeup of the poor, and minorities, for example, was inferior. Pivot of Civilization, by Margaret Sanger, 1922, p. 80
On mandatory sterilization of the poor:
One of Sanger’s greatest influences, sexologist/eugenicist Dr. Havelock Ellis (with whom she had an affair, leading to her divorce from her first husband), urged mandatory sterilization of the poor as a prerequisite to receiving any public aid. The Problem of Race Regeneration, by Havelock Ellis, p. 65, in Margaret Sanger: Father of Modern Society, p. 18. Ellis believed that any sex was acceptable, as long as it hurt no one. The Sage of Sex, A Life of Havelock Ellis, by Arthur Calder-Marshall, p. 88
On eradicating ‘bad stocks’:
The goal of eugenicists is “to prevent the multiplication of bad stocks,” wrote Dr. Ernst Rudin in the April 1933 Birth Control Review (of which Sanger was editor). Another article exhorted Americans to “restrict the propagation of those physically, mentally and socially inadequate.”
Sanger featured in Life magazine, 1937, “Margaret Sanger celebrates Birth Control Victory.”
http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm
No need to guess.
You got it right.
The moralist movement will not let them have birth control, sex ed, or anything resembling even a good human biology class in public school. So it’s Vacu suck time to the rescue. or at least that’s how they used to do it.
245 MURDERS per day just in NYC. Liberal AmeriKa you should be so proud of yourself!
If you're in new class and a fellow student brings this up ( especially a minority ) that's the first person you want to approach to join your study group.
So live births will be safe,legal and rare. Once more the law of unintended consequences raises up its ugly head.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.