1 posted on
07/02/2010 9:42:45 AM PDT by
Petruchio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Petruchio
SO, IN OTHER WORDS, THEY MADE IMPOSSIBLE FOR LOW INCOME PEOPLE TO OWN A GUN...
3 posted on
07/02/2010 9:45:07 AM PDT by
jessduntno
(I'm not a racist, you're just saying that because I'm white.)
To: Petruchio
Astounding the power this man wields.
4 posted on
07/02/2010 9:45:07 AM PDT by
Lando Lincoln
(Reconciliation will happen in November.)
To: Petruchio
So the liberal anti-Constitution bullies are at it again.
I’m sure all those in the ‘hood will immediately comply following “the grace period”, right? Gun related crimes and murders will plummet in Chicago, right?
Or is this really only aimed at law abiding citizens in an attempt by the state to make criminals out of citizens?
6 posted on
07/02/2010 9:47:01 AM PDT by
Obadiah
(I can see November from my house!)
To: Petruchio
Your little court rulings don’t apply to us!
We’re big, rich, important members of the American left!
7 posted on
07/02/2010 9:48:25 AM PDT by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: Petruchio; thethirddegree
I don’t think any gang members will obey the new limits. They’ll buy as many guns as they want, without taking safety classes.
Daley can run for re-election, in Feb. 2011. Who will oppose him? I emailed John Cox, Rosanna Pulido, and Dan Proft, and I asked them to run. Rosanna said that she won’t run, but I didn’t get a response from John or Dan.
To: Petruchio
When southern states tried to do a constitutional end-around in the 50’s 60’s it brought in the National Guard.
9 posted on
07/02/2010 9:49:55 AM PDT by
AU72
To: Petruchio
"City Council passes Daley gun restrictions 45-0"100% approval with minutes of deliberation? Kim Jong Il doesn't have that level of control over North Korea's parliament.
10 posted on
07/02/2010 9:49:55 AM PDT by
Fabozz
To: Petruchio
The rational purpose of gun control is to be able to rule without the consent of the governed
The rational response of the governed is revolution.
To: Petruchio
The rational purpose of gun control is to be able to rule without the consent of the governed
The rational response of the governed is revolution.
To: Petruchio
This idiocy will be fought in court I'm sure.
Cue Jeff Dunhan's puppet Walter.
Dumb*** Daley!
15 posted on
07/02/2010 9:57:52 AM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: Petruchio
Provisions include:
- FOID
- Chicago Permit (cost $100 every 3 years)
- Register ALL guns at $15 each every 3 years
- No Firearms sales in city
- Limited to one handgun per month
- 90 day grace period to register existing guns
- Training must include 4 hours classroom & 1 hour range time.
- NO RANGES ALLOWED IN CITY required range time must be in suburbs
- Transport broken down, inaccessible, unloaded, in a locked case
- Firearm only allowed inside dwelling. Not allowed in garage, front porch, yard, etc.
- Only one gun allowed to be in firing condition all others to be broken down or trigger locks.
- Guns not allowed in hotels, dorms and group living facilities.
- In homes with minors, all guns must be secured when they are not in the possession of the owner.
- Assault weapons are banned, as are sawed-off shotguns and "unsafe" handguns, as defined by the Chicago Police (whatever that means...)
- Gotta be over 21 or Parents must sign application
To: Petruchio
Sounds like it’s time for another lawsuit.
17 posted on
07/02/2010 10:00:34 AM PDT by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: Petruchio
45 to nothing?
They have a 45-member CITY COUNCIL!!??
I have to ask... ...are these paid jobs?
Would not his be the largest (and most inefficient) City Council on the planet?
To: Petruchio
The only reason someone wants to take your gun away from you is because he wants to do things to you that he could not do if you were armed.
19 posted on
07/02/2010 10:03:24 AM PDT by
dockkiller
(COME AND TAKE IT.)
To: Petruchio
18 USC Sec. 241 Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
24 posted on
07/02/2010 10:13:47 AM PDT by
vikingd00d
(chown -R us ./base)
To: Petruchio
The Chicago City Council today passed Mayor Richard Daley's new set of gun restrictions 45-0. Expect the MSM to show the same outrage to Daley defying the Supreme Court as they have shown to state AG's filing suit to block Obamacare.
Not.
26 posted on
07/02/2010 10:24:01 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: Petruchio
27 posted on
07/02/2010 10:26:23 AM PDT by
an amused spectator
(Watching the MSM with Obama is like watching Joslyn James with Tiger Woods)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
45 to 0, eh? I imagine it's pretty hard to vote against the mob when Guido & Luigi are waiting outside to break the legs of anyone with the temerity to go against the "will of the people"...
28 posted on
07/02/2010 10:32:01 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: Petruchio
37 posted on
07/02/2010 11:28:17 AM PDT by
Grunthor
(I like you but when the zombies chase us, I'm tripping you.)
To: Petruchio
Why the hell does a city council have 45 members? No wonder Chicago is unmanageable. Why not 450 members? Then they can govern as poorly as the US government.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson