Posted on 07/01/2010 6:18:50 AM PDT by fightinJAG
The Obama Administration and senior BP officials are frantically working not to stop the worlds worst oil disaster, but to hide the true extent of the actual ecological catastrophe. Senior researchers tell us that the BP drilling hit one of the oil migration channels and that the leakage could continue for years unless decisive steps are undertaken, something that seems far from the present strategy. [Click Photo to Enlarge]
In a recent discussion, Vladimir Kutcherov, Professor at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and the Russian State University of Oil and Gas, predicted that the present oil spill flooding the Gulf Coast shores of the United States could go on for years and years many years. [1]
According to Kutcherov, a leading specialist in the theory of abiogenic deep origin of petroleum, What BP drilled into was what we call a migration channel, a deep fault on which hydrocarbons generated in the depth of our planet migrate to the crust and are accumulated in rocks, something like Ghawar in Saudi Arabia.[2] Ghawar, the worlds most prolific oilfield has been producing millions of barrels daily for almost 70 years with no end in sight. According to the abiotic science, Ghawar like all elephant and giant oil and gas deposits all over the world, is located on a migration channel similar to that in the oil-rich Gulf of Mexico.
As I wrote at the time of the January 2010 Haiti earthquake disaster,[3] Haiti had been identified as having potentially huge hydrocasrbon reserves, as has neighboring Cuba. Kutcherov estimates that the entire Gulf of Mexico is one of the planets most abundant accessible locations to extract oil and gas, at least before the Deepwater Horizon event this April.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanpendulum.com ...
Yes.
"I see quite a few of those and that no blow out preventor could handle those pressures."
BS spread widely is still BS. But 11,000 psi is well within the design specs of this particular BOP. Building a BOP to withstand 100,000 psig is certainly not outside the abilities of today's engineering techniques.
"All ties in with abiotic oil theories which are 100% bunk too?"
That one I don't know about. IMO, the jury on abiotic oil is still out. Lots of data against, but for a long time it was thought that ulcers were due to stomach acid until one persistent doctor proved that they were caused by a bacterial infection. And it may be the case that "deep" oil is NOT abiotic, as the deeper we dig, we still find bacteria. Who is to say that there aren't some buggies deep within the earth which are converting abiotic methane (for which there is LOTS of evidence around the solar system) into oil.
Thanks...I always value your tech opinion and analysis
Special Report: Should BP nuke its leaking well?
Reuters ^ | Friday July 2, 2010 | By Nastassia Astrasheuskaya, Ben Judah, Alina Selyukh
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2545693/posts
Posts 7,8,11,12, etc. say / suggest "No".
Post #9 this thread says: Dont cap it, find a way to use it - by elpadre
Yeah Joe. With nine position readout. Things are getting a bit out of hand.
If the oil doesn’t kills us, the COREXIT will.
Read "The Deep Hot Biosphere" by Thomas Gold. May or may not convert you to the hypothesis, but it will definitely make you think.
I probably won’t get around to reading his book. But I read that Wired article. Plus the wikipedia entry for Thomas Gold is impressive. I would not bet against such a genius
Do you think Deepwater Horizon hit a pool of a very high pressure abiotic oil/methane mixture?
_____________________________________________________
How about Occams razor?
____________________________________________________
How about Achmeds razor?
Bookmark
Abiotic oil is a fact, regardless of who does or does not recognize it.
Unfortunately, in this instance, this geologically unlimited supply quite beyond the ability of human science to restrict means a localized ELE.
[abstract] - The Deep Hot Biosphere
http://www.pnas.org/content/89/13/6045.full.pdf
Abiogenic and Biogenic Petroleum
https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/mragheb/www/NPRE%20402%20ME%20405%20Nuclear%20Power%20Engineering/Biogenic%20and%20Abiogenic%20Petroleum.pdf
[TOC] - The Deep Hot Biosphere
http://www.gbv.de/dms/hebis-darmstadt/toc/185535321.pdf
Thanks to both of you for your support of my opinion/theory (which of course, isn’t really mine.)
While I’m glad to find some agreement, I’m at the same time sad to realize that if we’re right, this means we are all in very deep doo-doo.
The errors multiplied as if apocalypse was planned. Drilling numerous wells around the dome is the only solution. >>>>>>>>>
Eight relief wells drilled fairly close to the gusher well would relieve the pressure so the malignant well could be capped. But what if one or more of the relief wells blow out too because the pressure is so high down there?
Actually if it can be done.... If just one relief well can be drilled right into the gusher well. This relieves pressure by 50%. Maybe more if the relief well bore is wider than gusher well.
Then above that intersection relief well number two hits the gusher bore hole and starts pumping in mud and then cement. My opinion BP should be drilling two more backup relief wells right now that could be turned into production wells to help pay damages
Life on Earth is all teeth and blood and rot. Not much we can do about it except laugh and love.
I'm with you on this one...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.