Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Carrier Harry Truman Now Officially Just Off Iran ... Imminent Tehran Raid
Zero Hedge ^ | Sunday, June 27, 2010 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 06/28/2010 6:46:24 PM PDT by Star Traveler

USS Carrier Harry Truman Now Officially Just Off Iran, As Israel Allegedly Plotting An Imminent Tehran Raid

Submitted by Tyler Durden
06/27/2010 12:50 -0500


As we first reported last week, in an article that was met with much original skepticism, the Pentagon has now confirmed that a fleet of 12 warships has passed the Suez Canal, and is now likely awaiting orders to support the escalation in the Persian Gulf. The attached image from Stratfor shows the latest positioning of US aircraft carrier groups as of June 23: the USS Harry Truman (CVN-75) is now right next to USS Eisenhower (CVN 69), both of which are waiting patiently just off Iran.

As for the catalyst the two carriers may be anticipating, we provide the following update from the Gulf Daily News where we read that Israel may be on the verge of an attack of Iran, with an incursion originating from military bases in Azerbaijan and Georgia. 

Israel is massing warplanes in the Caucasus for an attack on Iran, it was revealed yesterday.

Preparations are underway to launch the military attack from Azerbaijan and Georgia, reports our sister paper Akhbar Al Khaleej, quoting military sources.

Israel was, in fact, training pilots in Turkey to launch the strike and was smuggling planes into Georgia using Turkish airspace, they said.

However, Turkey was unaware of Israel's intention of transferring the planes to Georgia, the sources said.

The unexpected crisis between Israel and Turkey following an Israeli commando raid on an aid flotilla bound for Gaza Strip hit Israeli calculations.

Azerbaijan-based intelligence units, working under the cover of technicians, trainers and consultants, have helped with the preparations, the sources said.

Military equipment, mostly supplied by the US, was transported to a Georgian port via the Black Sea.

Georgian coastguard and Israeli controllers are co-operating to hide the operations from Russian vessels, said the sources.

They point out that according to Israel, it will not be in a position to launch a strike on Iran without using bases in Georgia and Azerbaijan due to the limited capabilities of its nuclear submarines stationed near the Iranian coast.

Meanwhile, Iran's Press TV reported that a very large contingent of US ground forces had massed in Azerbaijan, near the Iranian border. The independent Azerbaijani news website Trend confirmed the report.

Those reports came just days after the Pentagon confirmed that an unusually large fleet of US warships had indeed passed through Egypt's Suez Canal en route to the Gulf. At least one Israeli warship reportedly joined the American armada.

Press TV also quoted Iranian Revolultionary Guard Brigadier General Mehdi Moini as saying that the country's forces are mobilised and ready to face Israelli and American "misadventures" near its borders.

* Iran last night said it has cancelled plans to send an aid ship to the Gaza Strip as Israel "had sent a letter to the UN saying that the presence of Iranian and Lebanese ships in the Gaza area will be considered a declaration of war on that regime and it will confront it," Irna said.

We caution readers to take this news with a grain of salt as the Gulf Daily News' sister publication, Akhbar Al Khaleej, has a slightly less than stellar credibility rating. Then again, this is what some, Breaking News Online most notably, said about last week's carrier news, urging readers to ignore it.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: navair
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: Star Traveler

Pure b.s. If zero were to try anything, it would be a failure like the crap Jimmy carter tried.


41 posted on 06/28/2010 7:29:49 PM PDT by gedeon3 (Wake up America!! The enemy is among us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GnL

By giving away the destination, it will give Zero’s muslim friends plenty of time to mine the crap out of the area?


42 posted on 06/28/2010 7:30:00 PM PDT by Quickgun (As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion. Mamas don't let your cowboys grow up to be babies..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JLS
You were saying ...

I would be shocked if Obama did this but maybe his political fortunes are bad enough....

Well, even Clinton had his "tail-wagging-the-dog" days ... LOL ...

43 posted on 06/28/2010 7:32:28 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: gedeon3
You were saying ...

Pure b.s. If zero were to try anything, it would be a failure like the crap Jimmy carter tried.

Maybe they're gonna let Israel do all the heavy lifting ... :-)

44 posted on 06/28/2010 7:34:02 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I was thinking the same, except it would be obama invading Arizonia to protect the illegals


45 posted on 06/28/2010 7:34:10 PM PDT by JoanneSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Keeping things cool.


46 posted on 06/28/2010 7:34:17 PM PDT by AceMineral (Do you go to women? Don't forget your whip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Quickgun
You were saying ...

By giving away the destination, it will give Zero’s muslim friends plenty of time to mine the crap out of the area?

They already said a long time ago they were mining the area ... :-)

47 posted on 06/28/2010 7:35:45 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

I wish people would stop hyping this type unfounded BS....if and when such an attack occurs, then inform Nostradamus that he can let me know..... =.=


48 posted on 06/28/2010 7:36:39 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Well, thank you very much for letting everyone and their Brother know the Status of Forces in CENTCOM. Ship movements are supposed to be “Secret” until they get to their appointed place.

But, this looks like the usual turn over of forces in the area, with one “inchopping” to the AOR, and the other “outchopping” and heading home from extended deployment. Did that a number of times myself between 1982 & 1991.

The time to worry is if one of the Groups doesn’t start the transit of the Suez Canal within 2 weeks. Then it’s time to break out the popcorn. But, then again,.....with the sorry excuse we have for a C-in-C, who knows what will happen.

Fair Winds and Following Seas Sailors & Marines. Hope to see you back soon.


49 posted on 06/28/2010 7:36:47 PM PDT by shredderman (Living in a Blue State, with a Blue Wife, But I'm Red to the bone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

He sure is .......... more than likely protect the Iranians from Israel by shooting down their planes and missiles. Think I’m kidding ........ not! He’s a coming out of the closet Muslim and will do what he said he’d do, side with the Muslims.


50 posted on 06/28/2010 7:39:48 PM PDT by Old Badger (boy do opportunities abound everywhere for Real Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie; sonofstrangelove; jhpigott

Ships and Submarines
Deployable Battle Force Ships: 288

Ships Underway (away from homeport): 159 ships (55% of total)

On deployment: 124 ships (43% of total)

Attack submarines underway (away from homeport): 32 subs (59%)

On deployment: 23 subs (42%)
Ships Underway

Carriers:
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) - 5th Fleet
USS George Washington (CVN 73) - Pacific Ocean
USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) - 5th Fleet
USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) - visit Pearl Harbor

Amphibious Warfare Ships:
USS Nassau (LHA 4) - visit Port Victoria
USS Peleliu (LHA 5) - Pacific Ocean
USS Wasp (LHD 1) - visit Halifax
USS Essex (LHD 2) - Sea of Japan
USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) - visit Pearl Harbor
~~~Navy.mil ~~~ June 28 ~~~

I lean toward A-Stan for the target,,,Kandahar...


51 posted on 06/28/2010 7:40:13 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

For what’s it’s worth, I have excellent contacts who tell me this is probably a bluff. Of course, I ask, what if Iran calls our bluff? My uneducated guess: Israel attacks, and we are compelled to finish the job.


52 posted on 06/28/2010 7:40:45 PM PDT by uscabjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

More than plausible.

However, I have some . . . nuances that are hard to articulate . . .

I’m feeling two contradictory things . . . .

1. That some dramatic things are about to change things big time.

2. That some things are going to take longer than expected.

I have no idea of the validity of either of those impressions.


53 posted on 06/28/2010 7:46:19 PM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian; Quix
You were saying ...

I think a lot of us are about to leave this world, one way or another.

Well, this doesn't have any of the earmarks of the Ezekiel 38/39 War, so I don't think this has anything to do with it. However, I do think that this kind of attack does "set up" the future (at another time) the basis for the Ezekiel 38/39 war.

And this has nothing to do with the Psalm 83 war.

So, this just appears to be another situation like all the previous Israeli interventions in the past.

54 posted on 06/28/2010 7:46:21 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

He won’t do anything but what he’s told to do.

And those telling him . . . are used to ordering world leaders around.


55 posted on 06/28/2010 7:47:06 PM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Could anyone have imagined the disaster that could have happened if the US and Britain had let the world know what was about to happen at Normandy a few weeks in advance???

How can we be so F’n stupid???


56 posted on 06/28/2010 7:48:09 PM PDT by Noob1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uscabjd
You were saying ...

For what’s it’s worth, I have excellent contacts who tell me this is probably a bluff.

I don't think Israel likes to bluff when it comes to Iran ... :-)

57 posted on 06/28/2010 7:48:41 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: shredderman
You were saying ...

Well, thank you very much for letting everyone and their Brother know the Status of Forces in CENTCOM. Ship movements are supposed to be “Secret” until they get to their appointed place.

I guess the Pentagon shouldn't have confirmed the information with Strafor, then ... :-)

58 posted on 06/28/2010 7:50:09 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cranked
You were saying ...

I wish people would stop hyping this type unfounded BS

Well, it's not unfounded that Israel has said in no uncertain terms that it's not going to allow Iran to get the big weapon ... :-)

59 posted on 06/28/2010 7:51:33 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

A naval blockade of Tulsa?


60 posted on 06/28/2010 7:52:21 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson