Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court rules for gun rights, strikes Chicago handgun ban
CNN ^ | 28 Jun 2010 | anon

Posted on 06/28/2010 7:31:39 AM PDT by docbnj

Court rules for gun rights, strikes Chicago handgun ban In another dramatic victory for firearm owners, the Supreme Court has ruled unconstitutional Chicago, Illinois' 28-year-old strict ban on handgun ownership, a potentially far-reaching case over the ability of state and local governments to enforce limits on weapons.

A conservative majority of justices on Monday reiterated its two-year-old conclusion the Constitution gives individuals equal or greater power than states on the issue of possession of certain firearms for self-protection.

The court, however, said local jurisdictions still retain the flexibility to preserve some "reasonable" gun control measures currently in place nationwide.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: banglist; gunrights; mcdonald; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Cboldt

“Anyway, I don’t trust SCOTUS, not one bit, when it comes to the second amendment. Not even Thomas.”

Which is exactly why there is a 2nd Amendment.... The Founders/Framers didn’t trust any part of the “Government” either! Even the one they were in the process of creating. Only a fool would trust his Life, Liberty, or Happiness to the Kids in Washington......


41 posted on 06/28/2010 8:21:18 AM PDT by Forty-Niner (The by product of the Information Age is the acceptance as fact of uninformed opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: docbnj

One more SC appointment and this will be reversed.


42 posted on 06/28/2010 8:22:22 AM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: docbnj
"reasonable" gun control measures

"Reasonable" to a liberal is NO Guns ... I don't understand why this is so ambiguous.

43 posted on 06/28/2010 8:22:53 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (http://www.thepatriotsflag.com - The Patriot's Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Put that in your keister Daley!


44 posted on 06/28/2010 8:34:39 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: docbnj
I'm reading the decision right now, here are some excerpts...

...concluding that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment right, recognized in Heller, to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense.

An absolute, clear victory on incorporation.

Self-defense is a basic right, recognized by many legal systems from ancient times to the present, and the Heller Court held that individual self-defense is “the central component” of the SecondAmendment right.

Sweeeet! No more "hunting or sporting use" BS.

Court found that this right applies to handguns because they are “the most preferred firearm in the nation to ‘keep’ and use for protection of one’s home and family,

So no more treating handguns as if they were some specially deadly weapon, not covered under the 2A.

the Fourteenth Amendment’s Framers and ratifiers counted the right to keep and bear arms among those fundamentalrights necessary to the Nation’s system of ordered liberty.

One of the big claims of the gun grabbers is that RTKBA is not a "fundamental" right. This reaffirms that it is.

In Heller, however, we expressly rejected the argument that the scope of the Second Amendment right should be determined by judicial interest balancing

This is important. The "interest balancing" criteria weakens whatever it's being applied to, where they can eliminate a right because they think it balances towards the interest of the state, security, safety, etc., in a specific case. That it is a fundamental right not subject to interest balancing means lawmakers and inferior judges have to be very careful about infringing it.

After that, the majority did a sound trashing of the dissents, with Scalia destroying Stevens' arguments. Thomas did a great concurrence, differing only in saying that the 2A is a privilege of citizenship and should be incorporated through the privileges and immunities clause instead of due process. I think I agree.

45 posted on 06/28/2010 8:43:48 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: docbnj
The court, however, said local jurisdictions still retain the flexibility to preserve some "reasonable" gun control measures currently in place nationwide.

This is the statement that will come back to bite us in the a**. It will take years of going back to court on every little obnoxious gun law in order to finally get SHALL issue in every state and to affirm that we have the right to open carry. I wonder how this will affect CAs stupid law on open carrying of empty firearms.

46 posted on 06/28/2010 9:02:32 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
47 posted on 06/28/2010 9:09:23 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

It’s a good day for the Constitution.


48 posted on 06/28/2010 9:17:29 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calex59
It will take years of going back to court on every little obnoxious gun law in order to finally get SHALL issue in every state and to affirm that we have the right to open carry.

And NO registration!

49 posted on 06/28/2010 9:40:15 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
It’s a good not a completely terrible day for the Constitution.
50 posted on 06/28/2010 9:42:07 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Yes it is indeed. I am sale-abrading!

http://www.parros.com/

51 posted on 06/28/2010 10:08:35 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes.......is a fascist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The gun ban did such a great job of reducing crime. Now that it’s gone, we’re doomed.


52 posted on 06/28/2010 10:10:07 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Well when you’re sitting there in your silk upholstered chair
Talking to some rich folk that you know
Well I hope you won’t see me in my ragged company
Cause you know I could never be alone

Take me down little Susie, take me down
I know you think you’re the queen of the underground
And you can send me dead flowers every morning
Send me dead flowers by the mail
Send me dead flowers to my wedding And
I won’t forget to put roses on your grave

Well when you’re sitting back in your rose pink cadillac
Making bets on Kentucky Derby Day
Ah, I’ll be in my basement room with a needle and a spoon
And another girl to take my pain away

Take me down little Susie, take me down
I know you think you’re the queen of the underground
And you can Send me dead flowers every morning
Send me dead flowers by the mail
Send me dead flowers to my wedding
And I won’t forget to put roses on your grave

Take me down little Susie, take me down
I know you think you’re the queen of the underground
And you can send me dead flowers every morning
Send me dead flowers by the US mail
Say it with dead flowers in my wedding
And I won’t forget to put roses on your grave
No, I won’t forget to put roses on your grave

- Rolling Stones


53 posted on 06/28/2010 12:04:28 PM PDT by Pajama Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
I'm amazed at how little muzzle rise there was even with the higher caliber rifles. As a po' boy I translate "magazine-clearing" as "wallet-emptying" though. lol

That would be a fun little device.

54 posted on 06/28/2010 1:34:04 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Investing in a few might be a good idea.LOL!


55 posted on 06/28/2010 2:36:13 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes.......is fascist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson