Posted on 06/08/2010 5:34:13 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative
She was FORCED out for financial reasons. If anyone tells you she quit let them know otherwise.
Her legal fee had accumulated higher than 500K. Her personal income was JUST OVER 100K a year. Financially her family was going under quickly. And they were filing another ethics complaint everytime she left the state. She was afraid to give interviews in the governors office. She was afraid to allow anyone other than staff in the Governors office after the TaserGate ordeal. They were destroying her. So, what were her options ? She tried to set up a legal defense fund. At that point some Democrat judge in Alaska accused THAT of being unethical.
So calling her a quitter is vile and ignorant. I am a no nonsense person. But get the facts straight and have some respect for a fellow human being.
Yes I did. I still will never again cast a vote for the likes of Whitman. The party wants no part of my values, so it will get no part of my values.
Very well said, Sharkey. And I completely agree.
She’s got a lot more backbone than most and I admire her for that!
You have a fat sounding username LOL, NA-NA-NA. :)
And we were talking about Whitman, when?
Are you ADHD as well as dumb? This is not a sign of a mentally well person.......
Lakeshark, so far you’re batting zero. Broaden your guesses a bit. Who knows, if you make enough of them you may actually score something late this year.
As it is, you’re a riot.
The pig in the poke can look it up in the dictionary if he’s really that concerned about it.
Don't make the Pillsbury doughboy jealous now.
I’m carrying on conversations with a number of different people, so if this gets too unsettling for you, perhaps you should take a breather and rest.
They must be directing your posts I guess.......telling you to post about Whitman to me.
Whitman?
*rolls eyes*
>....in her resignation speech she said a few important things. First she said she was doing it for Alaska, so they could move forward with the agenda she had implemented. The Second thing she said was she was going to fight for conservativism and the rebirth of our country and that should make most conservatives happy, all except the ankle biters on FR.....>
Your comments are spot on.
The only people who make an issue of the resignation
are the Neo left type who use the Alinsky rules for Radicals
“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon”
and
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
It won’t work, we know their source.
Stick to baseball. You seem to understand it at least. Unfortunately, you think everything else is equivocal and it’s not.
Ah you poor dear. Here, let’s post something different to you.
http://www.hotr.us/data/mccainagain.html
She quit, get over it. Quitting is not a good thing.
If you think it was dumb, then you are ignoring the obvious. less than a year later, Palin is a major Republican player. Ifshe had not, she would be trying to get re-elected and facing a flood of outside money aimed at her defeat.
It was in her case.
Yup.
Anybody who doesn't see this by now, isn't playing with an objective deck.
JMO.
Can you just stop.
If Palin gets the nomination. You are voting for her. I know it. You know it. You seem to think she is missing something upstairs. I bet you and others would think differently if you knew her personally. just a hunch.
why not give her a second chance and a second look
But notice that even to take the office for which he ran, Barack Obama would necessarily have to be a “quitter” — as would John McCain if he had won. Not one peep about the impending abandonment of either office. But everybody’s all wrapped up in “quitter-osis” about Sarah Palin now. If she “quit” for fame, fortune, and influence that really isn’t much of a “quit” is it?
All the flies are out and they are sticking to the fly paper.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.