“Did you plug the hole in your story yet, Daddy?”
Posted on 05/28/2010 2:08:35 PM PDT by i88schwartz
President Bill Clinton refuses to comment on the offer made to Rep. Joe Sestak on behalf of the White House. Clinton was asked several times, but ignored the question.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
I’m much more inclined to agree with your take on it than buy the premise that Clinton would take one for the team. Not unless there was something in it for him.
As long as he’s been on the national stage, over and over, we’ve seen how it works with him.
Clinton never does anything that he doesn’t think will benefit him personally. If it looks like he’s a Party loyalist, it’s only because it serves him personally, to advance himself. Like you said—a narcissist.
OK. Should we be surprised? NOT!!!!
Willy is still weak.
It looks the question registered with him and I sense fear
I can’t tell you how much I agree with with this statement. Frog-march is too good for them...slug march, maybe...
Good analysis. Just one thing to add. Clinton is obsessed with his legacy, which, let’s be honest, isn’t so hot. What would burnish it more than any other single thing? For Obama to become embroiled in a scandal that (in Clinton’s mind) made Monica Lewinsky look tame by comparison.
If that happened, people would look back and say, ‘That Bill Clinton. He had his dalliance [nobody would toss in that he lied under oath about it] but at least he beat the rap and stayed the course. This Obama is an inexperienced bad-news piker by comparison.
That, to borrow/bastardize a phrase, is a story Clinton would consider worth telling.
Wondering if Clinton wasn’t arm-twisted into this by Rahmbo?
This is REALLY good news.
This shows that either:
1. They don't have many of the fundamentals of their BS story together yet
2. They don't TRUST EACH OTHER and nobody knows for sure what the other will say under oath
Wow, it doesn't get any better than this! The new regime is BOTH dirty and incompetent.
They know there's a US Vice Admiral out there who will tell the truth under oath...even if he's willing to "spin" in the media and tell the partial story.
Until this video I didn't think much would come of this. Now, I'm pretty sure we'll be talking about this a year from now.
The problem is, criminals are not distracted from their current crimes just because an earlier one has been detected.
Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive...
I posted this on January 30th, 2009:
“I actually see a situation where Obama is forced to step down, Biden chooses Hillary Clinton as VP, and then Biden steps down due to health concerns.
That puts Hillary as the incumbent in 2012. If she is indeed blackmailing Obama, she’s not going to wait until 2012 and possibly lose again. She’ll do what it takes to have the upper hand.”
>>
It does make sence.
LOL. Now, that is bad.
musicman , you’re really bad. LOL
Bingo!
Yes. Yes, he does.
Maybe Obama's been looking down Sandy Berger's pants. Two birds, one stone...you know the drill.
Obama's big mistake was letting Hillary anywhere near his Administration. She's just been waiting for the "Trent Lott" moment. Seriously...the Clinton's know how Chicago politics work. Wait for him to screw up and swoop in. Hillary sat at Bernie Nussbaum's side during Watergate. She can take the high road..."I don't want to see America put through that again...." It's a load of crap, but it's her only remaining shot at POTUS.
I agree with your analysis.
“R U kidding. The MSM will laugh this off by morning!”
That’s why I’d throw a party for Bill, because I feel the same way as you do.
The media is going to do everything to ignore it next week.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.