Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

47% Now Hold Unfavorable View of Kagan
Rasmussen Reports ^ | May 26, 2010

Posted on 05/26/2010 3:36:00 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

Voters have an increasingly unfavorable opinion of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan but are more convinced than ever that she will be confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 41% of U.S. voters now hold a favorable opinion of Kagan but 47% view her unfavorably, up from 43% a week ago and 39% just after President Obama announced her nomination.

These findings include 15% with a Very Favorable opinion and 23% who regard her Very Unfavorably. This, too, marks a shift from the first survey when Kagan’s Very Favorables were 18% and Very Unfavorables were 17%.

By comparison, the president’s first Supreme Court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor, maintained favorables around 50% through the first three surveys following her selection, with unfavorables falling to 40%.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: polls; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 05/26/2010 3:36:01 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative; pissant; SwinneySwitch; neverdem; Cicero
If we play our cards right, we could stop her. One Freeper (Cicero) has found changes Kagan made in Harvard's curriculum that could be damaging. Also, we need to shake down some of her records at the Clinton Justice Department in the 1990’s.
2 posted on 05/26/2010 3:37:57 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Make your first call to Orrin Hatch. /s


3 posted on 05/26/2010 3:39:10 PM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The woman is an anti-Constitutional loon. Read her writing for the Harvard Law Review “Presidential Administration” — It’s about how the president takes over America and runs it through the bureaucracy.

Of course it forgets about the public being armed part. But she is also anti-Second Amendment.


4 posted on 05/26/2010 3:41:39 PM PDT by Tarpon (Obama-Speak ... the fusion of sophistry and Newspeak. It's not a gift, it's just lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

If the Republicans were smart they’d do everything possible to stop this woman. It would be the right fight, because more than just the conservative base see the problems with her. (And that number will grow as more leaks out about her record/positions.) But it would also fire up the base and persuade us that once in a while the Republicans can take a principled stand and actually score a victory.


5 posted on 05/26/2010 3:45:46 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

A 41 % favorable rating is better than Obamacare is doing in the polls so that will matter not one whit to the Demonrats who will ram Kagan through to confirmation.


6 posted on 05/26/2010 3:48:13 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Another reason I hate polls/surveys. This, like all of them, means nothing.


7 posted on 05/26/2010 3:51:19 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes (No matter where you go there are always more stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

But wait- look at how good hiring an inexperience partisan zealot has worked out in the presidency!!


8 posted on 05/26/2010 3:52:57 PM PDT by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

See, I’m not sure I understand this argument. Face the facts, if Kagan is shot down (and she won’t be) the next nominee will be more liberal, much more liberal. There is a dem president and dem congress—there will be a dem SCOTUS nominee. Kagan is about as unoffensive as could reasonably be expected. (Garland might be slightly more so.)


9 posted on 05/26/2010 3:54:58 PM PDT by Conservativism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Amen, bro. The trick is getting the morons in Congress to pay attention to the laundry we dig up.


10 posted on 05/26/2010 3:57:42 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

0bama doesn’t care if Kagan is an unpopular choice.
Appointing people who will rape thr Constitution for the next 30 years is all he cares about.


11 posted on 05/26/2010 4:01:01 PM PDT by counterpunch (GOP: Government's Other Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservativism

Kagan is moonbat leftist crazy. I’m not playing games, but I honestly don’t have the time to delineate all her extremist liberal insanity at this moment. I made a quick post, and didn’t expect to get into a back and forth over it. I’m confident is you do some digging, you’ll hit the mother-lode. Or if you’re already fully aware of how psychotically leftist she is, and you think his next one will be even worse, then I guess we don’t have anything to talk about anyway, even if time were not an issue.


12 posted on 05/26/2010 4:02:06 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

How the heck is it under 50 percent?


13 posted on 05/26/2010 4:06:06 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservativism
Unoffensive?

On whose standards?

Yours?

14 posted on 05/26/2010 4:09:54 PM PDT by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

You don’t have time because you can’t. And that’s OK, her record is extremely thin. However, there’s not much to justify the adjectives you’re tossing around. The court will almost certainly tilt more right with Kagan rather than Stevens on it—and much of the criticism against Kagan is from the left because she is too centrist.

To me, it’s a matter of managing expectations. You’re not going to get Miguel Estrada nominated from this congress/president. Fact. So who—that might reasonably be nominated—would be more favorable to the R’s? I can only think of Garland.


15 posted on 05/26/2010 4:13:07 PM PDT by Conservativism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Within the spectrum of realistic candidates.


16 posted on 05/26/2010 4:15:17 PM PDT by Conservativism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The country needs some more edumacation.


17 posted on 05/26/2010 4:19:08 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

These two could be such good "friends"!
18 posted on 05/26/2010 4:19:31 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservativism

You just called a fellow Freeper a liar - with no basis or evidence whatsoever. That is damned disgusting behavior and you should be ashamed.


19 posted on 05/26/2010 4:23:08 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

thought it was more than that with unfavorable view of her


20 posted on 05/26/2010 4:24:48 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson