Onyx, you misread. I said she was sly about her support for libertarianism, not in pointing out that Paul is libertarian, although as I said she re-invents him as a conservative.
What Sarah Palin has to say doesn’t matter to me, and hasn’t for some time. I am just sad to see what this is doing to our country, how malleable the voters have become in following a leader instead of following principles.
Trying to define Sarah Palin over her endorsement and support of Rand Paul is as nonsensical as the attempts in the cases of McCain and Fiorina or any other candidate some people might deem contraversial. Sarah makes no apologies for her endorsements. She stands by every one of them. That’s a leader.
Endorsements don’t win elections. Candidates have to win elections. Rand Paul won his and now the LSM is trying to take him out.
Sarah endorses and supports candidates of her choice in races she’s evaluated. She’s campaiging across the nation trying her best to build a conservative Republican majority. I’m not all that fond of Rand Paul, but he’s the Republican nominee and he’s one hell of a lot better than the democrat. He’ll be for smaller government and he’ll give the Marxists in the US Senate hell.