Trying to define Sarah Palin over her endorsement and support of Rand Paul is as nonsensical as the attempts in the cases of McCain and Fiorina or any other candidate some people might deem contraversial. Sarah makes no apologies for her endorsements. She stands by every one of them. That’s a leader.
Endorsements don’t win elections. Candidates have to win elections. Rand Paul won his and now the LSM is trying to take him out.
Sarah endorses and supports candidates of her choice in races she’s evaluated. She’s campaiging across the nation trying her best to build a conservative Republican majority. I’m not all that fond of Rand Paul, but he’s the Republican nominee and he’s one hell of a lot better than the democrat. He’ll be for smaller government and he’ll give the Marxists in the US Senate hell.
I stand with Paul Mirengoff of Powerline:
"It isn't shocking that Rand Paul wants to revisit the wisdom of infringing on the right of racists to deny basic services, and the opportunity to earn a decent living, to African-Americans based on their race. There is a type of libertarian who still wants to fight this battle. What's shocking is that the Republican party, on the strength of the Tea party movement, has apparently nominated one of them to run for the United States Senate."
P.S. Rand is not a senator yet... the election will be held this fall.