Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pa. legislator plans to introduce immigration bill
Citizens Voice (Wilkes Barre PA) ^ | 5/2/2010 | Kent Jackson

Posted on 05/02/2010 5:52:15 PM PDT by Born Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: TLEIBY308

Well, then, it seems to me that they need something to do. Let’s pass this law, then send them to Kennett Square. The illegals working the mushroom farms will occupy them for months.


21 posted on 05/02/2010 6:17:40 PM PDT by Windcatcher (Obama is a COMMUNIST and the MSM is is armband-wearing propaganda machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: paman12

Fast Eddie is gone soon...


22 posted on 05/02/2010 6:18:25 PM PDT by Windcatcher (Obama is a COMMUNIST and the MSM is is armband-wearing propaganda machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Ping


23 posted on 05/02/2010 6:21:37 PM PDT by Born Conservative ("I'm a fan of disruptors" - Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

It’s possible that someone may show Todd Eachus a prison door.

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2009/12/pennsylvania_house_majority_le.html


24 posted on 05/02/2010 6:24:33 PM PDT by Born Conservative ("I'm a fan of disruptors" - Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hampdenkid

Interestingly, Pennsylvania is the only state in the nation that actually forbids all law enforcement except State Troopers from running radar. Local cops and sheriffs are prohibited, and thus only rarely found with a stopwatch and two white lines on the road timing how fast cars are going. Additionally, State Troopers can only use stationary, not moving radar.

Every so often a bill comes up to lift the restriction but it’s always been defeated because we don’t want speed traps here.

And guess what? Our traffic accidents aren’t any higher than normal.


25 posted on 05/02/2010 6:26:53 PM PDT by Dan Nunn (Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise. -The Great One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

And of course, it’s always a RAT who introduces the bill to lift the restriction. All they want is to raise revenue.


26 posted on 05/02/2010 6:31:09 PM PDT by Windcatcher (Obama is a COMMUNIST and the MSM is is armband-wearing propaganda machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

I wish I had someone like Metcalfe was my state rep. No, I have swamp thing Kula. The person who as a judge cost my mom from getting unemployment checks and let the person that attacked my brother go off free. Plus, she got a brand new car after she was elected and guess who payed for it. I did. I had to pay for her car and I am paying for her paycheck and that makes me sick. What has she done for my area? NOTHING. I am tired of politicians like her and sadly I live in a dodo area that voted her into office. Her yard sign says for the people, more like for herself.


27 posted on 05/02/2010 6:31:17 PM PDT by paman12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
Interestingly, Pennsylvania is the only state in the nation that actually forbids all law enforcement except State Troopers from running radar. Local cops and sheriffs are prohibited, and thus only rarely found with a stopwatch and two white lines on the road timing how fast cars are going. Additionally, State Troopers can only use stationary, not moving radar.

Hmmm...not sure about that since a Conewago township cop nailed me last year on radar doing 73 in a 65 zone. He had his camera pointed straight at me as I came across a slight rise on the highway, with him sitting just on the other side of the crest.

Also, Route 15 between Harrisburg and Gettysburg is just one big speedtrap, ESPECIALLY around York Springs and the Gettysburg Outlet Mall, for both troopers and township cops, out to make their quotas.

28 posted on 05/02/2010 6:35:12 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Some info here.

http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/328584.html


29 posted on 05/02/2010 6:38:28 PM PDT by Windcatcher (Obama is a COMMUNIST and the MSM is is armband-wearing propaganda machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Hmmm...not sure about that since a Conewago township cop nailed me last year on radar doing 73 in a 65 zone.

You got a ticket for 8 over? That's ridiculous. As for the statement, I've seen it other places too but here's one vouching its validity:

"State police - the only cops in Pennsylvania allowed by law to use radar to write speeding tickets..."

I've also read that no police department in Pennsylvania is authorized to use laser.

30 posted on 05/02/2010 6:42:30 PM PDT by Dan Nunn (Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise. -The Great One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TLEIBY308

Maybe if this bill comes up after November when Eddie is out and a (hopefully) Republlican governor is elected. Of course, it would also depend on who is in control of the state legislature.


31 posted on 05/02/2010 6:44:33 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

I’m pretty sure PA’s law enforcement officers are already doing this. Every month I hear about troopers busting illegals on I-80. They pull ‘em over for traffic violations, find no ID, and arrest them.


32 posted on 05/02/2010 6:45:04 PM PDT by sand lake bar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Good for PA. In MD, the pols got so greedy and the cops got so lazy that they even went a step beyond manning radar guns. Now, they have a law that if you have your wipers on and not your headlights, you can be flagged over and fined. How’s that for shameful, slothful jack-boot fund raising?


33 posted on 05/02/2010 6:45:10 PM PDT by hampdenkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
Thanks for that! It explains why I occasionally see two line painted on the roadways around here.

Also, that little cop in Conewago definitely had some sort of device pointed at me that morning. I saw it clear as day, and when he pulled me over, he said he had "clocked" (whatever that means in the context of this discussion) me at 73 MPH.

Perhaps he was bending the law, knowing full well that I would just send in a check for $90 rather than spend $200 for a traffic lawyer to beat his ticket?

34 posted on 05/02/2010 6:45:51 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

I wouldn’t call it an “immigration bill” as the lame-stream press likes to label things as innocuous and innocent - Arizona’s new law is a “repel the invaders” law!!!


35 posted on 05/02/2010 6:48:08 PM PDT by fwdude (It is not the liberals who will destroy this country, but the "moderates.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Yep...8 miles over. $90 ticket, including court costs that were of course, never incurred.


36 posted on 05/02/2010 6:53:54 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
"I wouldn’t call it an “immigration bill” as the lame-stream press likes to label things..."

I agree, it does not make sense to call it an immigration bill. Immigrants are not affected by it, only illegal aliens are. There would be no change in the immigration process or application. It mirrors the federal law, that somehow isn't racist. If immigrants or the immigration process is not affected, it makes no sense to me why it is called an immigration law.

37 posted on 05/02/2010 7:05:13 PM PDT by GregoTX (I am the resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

>I would just send in a check for $90<

That’s your first mistake. Appear before the judge and say your piece!


38 posted on 05/02/2010 7:09:28 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Should people be questioning their government? Yes and "Where's the birth certificate?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: manc

Boy I hope so. That the legislator would even consider this is a plus...Hey, the border states are in a bad way and the federal government did nothing (another reason not to rely on the federal government). Voters are tired of paying for everybody..It’s time to act.


39 posted on 05/02/2010 7:10:48 PM PDT by hstacey (Army Mom...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Well, I was traveling through Conewago on business at the time, and to return and fight the ticket would have cost me much more than $90, including a missed day of work and expenses, plus whatever extra cost the magistrate would have added to the fine for contesting the charge. It just was not worth the hassle, which is EXACTLY what these little township flunkies count on when they nab you in their speed traps.


40 posted on 05/02/2010 7:20:31 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson