Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newspaper circulation slides nationwide (Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™)
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | April 27, 2010 | Alejandro Martínez-Cabrera

Posted on 04/27/2010 2:33:16 AM PDT by Zakeet

The Chronicle said Monday that remaking its business model by charging more for the newspaper has, as expected, produced a sharp drop in circulation even as it has improved the paper's bottom line.

For the six months ending in March, the Audit Bureau of Circulations reported Monday that The Chronicle's daily circulation declined 22.7 percent, from 312,118 to 241,330, the largest decline among the nation's top 25 newspapers.

Weekday circulation nationwide went down 8.7 percent, and 6.5 percent on Sundays.

[Snip]

The top U.S. newspapers by average weekday and Sunday circulation from October 2009 through March. The percentage changes are from the same six-month span last year.

  1. Wall Street Journal: 2,092,523 weekday (up 0.5 percent); no Sunday edition.

  2. USA Today: 1,826,622 weekday (down 13.6 percent); no Sunday edition.

  3. New York Times: 951,063 weekday (down 8.5 percent); 1,376,230 Sunday (down 5.2 percent).

  4. Los Angeles Times: 616,606 weekday (down 14.7 percent); 941,914 Sunday (down 7.6 percent).

  5. Washington Post: 578,482 weekday (down 13.1 percent); 797,679 Sunday (down 8.2 percent).

The Chronicle is No. 24, with a weekday circulation of 241,330 (down 22.7 percent); and a Sunday circulation of 286,121 (down 19.3 percent).

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: dinomedia; economy; mediabias; msm; newspaper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Impeccable Publisher Logic: Our circulation is dropping even though we have seen a net increase in the number of new subscribers (whatever the hell that means); our revenues are dropping, even as this has improved our papers' bottom line (however the hell that can happen); and this is all good because it means we are going out of business at slower rate.

1 posted on 04/27/2010 2:33:16 AM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb
Falling circulations really are good news for the newspaper industry ping.
2 posted on 04/27/2010 2:34:58 AM PDT by Zakeet (Will Rogers never met the Wee Wee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

So far the only numbers I have seen on the web are those from the top 25 newspapers. If you run across the numbers from the rest of the country, ping me. I’m very interested in how the local Gannetoids are faring.


3 posted on 04/27/2010 2:45:14 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

There are several observations here. First, if you were a journalist with any of these papers...watching them spiral downward...you’d be awful worried about your future and your pay situation (don’t anticipate pay raises). So staying on a left-wing slant...eventually would eventually determine your life’s ambitions as being doomed.

Second...for you the owner of such a newspaper in a spiral...with this open data being published and all your townspeople and friends aware of the stat’s....you have a continual barrage of people asking how you will improve. Dumping your slanted news is probably not an option...so you keep talking about this big-time reporter you are bringing to town....to pump up enthusiasm.

Third and final...the numbers are played around with people who place advertising. They can walk in and suggest a 10 percent discount because of lousy reader numbers. They will likely get that.

Now a personal slant to this deal. I went back to my old hometown over the weekend. My dad still subscribes to the local paper. So I’m sitting there on a Sunday morning and reading this paper. It used to take me around thirty minutes to read the Sunday paper...this time, it took eight minutes. They’ve downsized drastically and eighty percent of the Sunday paper was packaged from the mother organization. There was barely one page of anything local and it was obvious that they were cutting back.


4 posted on 04/27/2010 2:46:21 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

You would think they would get the point with only the post and WSJ doing well.

They can’t see past their bias.

I would like to take the paper for coupons, but I refuse to put one cent in the St Peterberg Times. Even my eight year old noticed the bias from the pictures!


5 posted on 04/27/2010 2:51:22 AM PDT by I still care (I believe in the universality of freedom -George Bush, asked if he regrets going to war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I think a lot of USA Today’s circulation comes from the free copies hotels slide under your door. Mine always goes, unread, straight to the garbage.


6 posted on 04/27/2010 2:51:36 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

>> if you were a journalist with any of these papers...watching them spiral downward...you’d be awful worried about your future and your pay situation (don’t anticipate pay raises)

Or, you-the-journalist could just remain one of that stubborn 27% who “strongly approve” of Barack Obama, and *hope* that he finds a way to pay you out of his bottomless “stash”...


7 posted on 04/27/2010 2:53:17 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: laconic

Grampa Dave says whenever he travels he always insists that the hotel deduct the $0.50 from his bill they tack on for USAT. Sometimes they fuzz up about doing it, but he insists.

He says the personal satisfaction he gets from making his point has many times the value of the $0.50.


8 posted on 04/27/2010 2:55:18 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: I still care

Give the Tampa Tribune a try for Sunday Coupons. Their Sunday paper costs 50 cents (cheaper than daily). I buy 2, only for the coupons, scan the rest and save the rest to use as a weed block in my flower garden.
I was thrifty and “green” when it wasnt cool.


9 posted on 04/27/2010 3:14:51 AM PDT by vis a vis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abb
So far the only numbers I have seen on the web are those from the top 25 newspapers. If you run across the numbers from the rest of the country, ping me. I’m very interested in how the local Gannetoids are faring.

No luck with that, either. But I did come across the circulation numbers for the top 100 rags from just four years ago.

Consider the following:

Such is the miracle of compounding and discounting.

Also note how many of the old titles have folded, and how many have undergone (or are presently undergoing) bankruptcy proceedings.

Very interesting read.

10 posted on 04/27/2010 3:17:43 AM PDT by Zakeet (Will Rogers never met the Wee Wee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/business/media/27paper.html?ref=business
Judge Says 3 Can Bid at Newspaper Auction

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/business/media/27audit.html?ref=business
Newspaper Circulation Falls Nearly 9%


11 posted on 04/27/2010 3:17:47 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"The Chronicle is No. 24, with a weekday circulation of 241,330 (down 22.7 percent); and a Sunday circulation of 286,121 (down 19.3 percent)."

Wow, if this qualifies for 24th the print media is really in trouble.

12 posted on 04/27/2010 3:19:51 AM PDT by 1776 Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

has nothing to do with bias and hostility towards average Americans...nope it’s that damn internet


13 posted on 04/27/2010 3:25:58 AM PDT by rman04554
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

HMMMM lets see selling less papers, lets see, I know lets raise the price that will do it.


14 posted on 04/27/2010 4:08:44 AM PDT by bikerman (Impeachment ! Has a nice ring to it don't you think?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Look at the up side. Fewer papers sold means less printing stock and ink to buy!


15 posted on 04/27/2010 4:16:25 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Why worry? The Puffery/Earnings Ratio is doing great!


16 posted on 04/27/2010 4:40:31 AM PDT by cookcounty ("When they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun," --"Brawls for Radicals" --by Barack Alinsky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikerman

“HMMMM lets see selling less papers, lets see, I know lets raise the price that will do it.” You were joking but that’s EXACTLY what they are doing.


17 posted on 04/27/2010 4:48:02 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vis a vis

It’s got to be better than the SPT. I really abhor that sheet.

A friend once told me, I listen to what they say and take the opposite view. They can be reliable to take the wrong view 100% of the time.

If they run out of things to print, they’ll write some headline on how we need more taxes. Today their headline is on the “Gulf Oil Spill Threatening FL”.


18 posted on 04/27/2010 4:51:10 AM PDT by I still care (I believe in the universality of freedom -George Bush, asked if he regrets going to war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Soon, these rags will be down to a single subscriber; the U.S. taxpayer. I’m betting the papers go the GM bailout route. It will be touted as “The Preservation of the First Amendment Bill”, or some other similar malarkey.


19 posted on 04/27/2010 4:54:40 AM PDT by 6SJ7 (atlasShruggedInd = TRUE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

What the data doesn’t tell us is how many subscriptions are free. For example, isn’t USA Today given free (or dramatically discounted) to many hotels/motels?

On a different point, I recall when the NY Slimes and the WSJ were neck and neck in terms of circulation. The WSJ is pretty expensive, but their circulation is now more than twice that of the Slimes.


20 posted on 04/27/2010 5:06:14 AM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson