Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 Agents busted in my door this morning - Unlawful entry 3-30-2010 - 6:30 am
You Tube ^ | April 5, 2010 | earthicaster

Posted on 04/05/2010 4:16:34 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom

Police trying to locate someone on a bench warrant search a woman's house without her consent. They produce no warrant - bail agent says he does not need one. She repeatedly denies them permission to enter. Some of the police enter through a back door also. The person they were looking for was not there. She said he did not live there. Not sure if he had listed that address or not.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; police; rapeofliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Vendome

In the state of Washington opening your door can be (and often is) considered by the cops to be an invitation to enter. Your best bet is to speak through the door like she did. Too bad she didn’t have a more secure back door.

In my home the person who illegally entered through the back door would be lying in a pool of his own blood and I would either be dead or in jail...


41 posted on 04/05/2010 5:08:50 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

This is in Kah-lee-Fawn-ee-ahh, and they are required to obtain permission and that other dweeb without LEO credentials doesn’t belong on her side yard her front lawn.

Lawyer up.


42 posted on 04/05/2010 5:12:46 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Feel free to illuminate us with your knowledge.


43 posted on 04/05/2010 5:13:30 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

That dweeb still has no right to enter her house.

Thing is I am wondering why she didn’t dial 911?


44 posted on 04/05/2010 5:14:11 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

It should come with the obligatory disclaimer. But, hey, who cares? You are getting hits, right?

Post on.


45 posted on 04/05/2010 5:15:01 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Come on....”a pack of fascistic [sic] pigs.” Isn’t that something the lefties would say?

Guess I’m naive....my first question is what was the guy arrested for and bonded out on?


46 posted on 04/05/2010 5:15:13 PM PDT by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: PackerBoy

It wouldn’t matter if she is a nut job! Barge into my home that way and you’ll meet Mr. Mossberg!


47 posted on 04/05/2010 5:15:32 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT,NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

“Whatever nOOb. The title of the Post is itself misleading and purposely so. I am not putting the post in for ZOT but wouldn’t surprise me if happened”

Check links before posting ignorant, blovaiting crap like that please.


48 posted on 04/05/2010 5:15:48 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

And his cousin Kimber.


49 posted on 04/05/2010 5:15:57 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GregB

Hell, the department of education has guns now! The mailman may be packing by next week!


50 posted on 04/05/2010 5:17:22 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT,NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lmr

Yeh, she knows people involved but that doesn’t excuse what happened.


51 posted on 04/05/2010 5:20:14 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT,NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Whatever nOOb. The title of the Post is itself misleading and purposely so. I am not putting the post in for ZOT but wouldn’t surprise me if happened.

The thread is linked to a youtube video. And he posted in the comment section the question: "What is the word on this? Did the police have a right to search her house. Interesting video."

How is that "purposely misleading"?

52 posted on 04/05/2010 5:21:54 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG
Come on....”a pack of fascistic [sic] pigs.” Isn’t that something the lefties would say?

Dunno, don't care. Entry to my home is by way of invitation. If that make me leftist then all I can say is welcome to the new conservative leftism. BTW: fascistic is the correct spelling of the word.

Guess I’m naive....my first question is what was the guy arrested for and bonded out on?

My first question is exactly like hers: "Do you have a warrant?" followed by "I am armed and will shoot to protect my home".
53 posted on 04/05/2010 5:25:23 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Repo people? You know that if you finance a car it belongs to the bank, right? Its not yours. And if you don’t pay, they should take it back.


54 posted on 04/05/2010 5:30:36 PM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
That dweeb still has no right to enter her house.

It all depends if the house was used as collateral for bail and the condition of the bond if there is a default, as there was in this case...The more I look at this the more I believed we are being fooled...

As for the Deputies...that a matter for the Courts.


55 posted on 04/05/2010 5:32:22 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I’m not so certain she has a case to sue. If she signed an agreement with the bail bond company to gain access to her property, all bets are off. They may have been within their right to search her property because in this event she would have given them permission when she posted bail. Yeah, I know it looks bad, but I think it’s mostly because she’s making it look bad. The biggest mistake being committed here is a lack of professionalism. These guys are very arrogant, to say the least, but probably aren’t doing anything illegal. I withhold judgement though until I know all the facts. It’s easy to play victim to zealous cops in our society.


56 posted on 04/05/2010 5:35:27 PM PDT by lmr (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?

>>If they were bailbondsmen they can do as they please with no warrant.<<

Where in the hell did you ever get this idea? It’s a good way to get yourself shot if you are a bail-bondsmen. You have to have reasonable suspicion that your runner is in the house. That means you have to know that he’s in the house, not just hope he’s in there.


57 posted on 04/05/2010 6:01:27 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Should people be questioning their government? Yes and "Where's the birth certificate?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

“I am armed and will shoot to protect my home”.

You do that. Obviously, many here would agree with you, however, as unfortunate as it may seem, legal entry to your home is not always by way of invitation. If the woman was believed to be harboring a fugitive who’d skipped after being charged with, oh let’s say, some disgusting crime against one of your loved ones, you might be singing a different tune and grateful for that “pack of fascistic pigs” who were going after the suspect. That’s all I’m saying.

California Penal Code

842. An arrest by a peace officer acting under a warrant is lawful even though the officer does not have the warrant in his possession at the time of the arrest, but if the person arrested so requests it, the warrant shall be shown to him as soon as practicable.

844. To make an arrest, a private person, if the offense is a felony, and in all cases a peace officer, may break open the door or window of the house in which the person to be arrested is, or in which they have reasonable grounds for believing the person to be, after having demanded admittance and explained the purpose for which admittance is desired.

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/roddy/pc.837.htm


58 posted on 04/05/2010 6:09:48 PM PDT by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Deeb is stil wrong, wrong, wrong. He did not identify the person as actually being in the house. Therefore no lawful reason to enter.

Further, the bondsman nor the deputies can go searching through the house, randomly, looking for whatever.

Other bondsmen carry their paperwork with them to support their case but, still without positvely identifying the bail jumper as currently being in the house, the law is on the woman’s side.

Same goes for the deputies. No probable cause.

Back to Constitution and California Constitution which says basically the same thing.

There is not and would not be a contract giving anyone random authority to search the domain.


59 posted on 04/05/2010 6:18:12 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

Amazing! They didn’t shoot either her or any dog!


60 posted on 04/05/2010 6:23:39 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson