Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What About Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest? Women and Sexual Assault
Life News ^ | 4/5/10 | Amy Sobie

Posted on 04/05/2010 3:13:26 PM PDT by wagglebee

LifeNews.com Note: Amy Sobie is the editor of The Post-Abortion Review, a quarterly publication of the Elliot Institute. The organization is a widely respected leader in research and analysis of medical, mental health and other complications resulting from abortions.

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. Many people, including those whose mission is to help women and girls who are victims of sexual assault and abuse, believe abortion is the best solution if a pregnancy occurs.

Yet our research shows that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault don't want abortion, and say abortion only compounds their trauma.

“How can you deny an abortion to a twelve-year-old girl who is the victim of incest?”

Typically, people on both sides of the abortion debate accept the premise that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault want abortions. From this “fact,” it naturally follows that the reason women want abortions in these cases is because it will help them to put the assault behind them, recover more quickly, and avoid the additional trauma of giving birth to a “rapist’s child.”

But in fact, the welfare of a mother and her child are never at odds, even in sexual assault cases. As the stories of many women confirm, both the mother and the child are helped by preserving life, not by perpetuating violence.

Sadly, however, the testimonies of women who have actually been pregnant through sexual assault are routinely left out of this public debate. Many people, including sexual assault victims who have never been pregnant, may be forming opinions based on their own prejudices and fears rather than the real life experiences of those people who have been in this difficult situation and reality.

For example, it is commonly assumed that rape victims who become pregnant would naturally want abortions. But in the only major study of pregnant rape victims ever done prior to this book, Dr. Sandra Mahkorn found that 75 to 85 percent did not have abortions. This figure is remarkably similar to the 73 percent birth rate found in our sample of 164 pregnant rape victims. This one finding alone should cause people to pause and reflect on the presumption that abortion is wanted or even best for sexual assault victims.1

Several reasons were given for not aborting. Many women who become pregnant through sexual assault do not believe in abortion, believing it would be a further act of violence perpetrated against their bodies and their children. Further, many believe that their children’s lives may have some intrinsic meaning or purpose which they do not yet understand. This child was brought into their lives by a horrible, repulsive act. But perhaps God, or fate, will use the child for some greater purpose. Good can come from evil.

The woman may also sense, at least at a subconscious level, that if she can get through the pregnancy she will have conquered the rape. By giving birth, she can reclaim some of her lost self-esteem. Giving birth, especially when conception was not desired, is a totally selfless act, a generous act, a display of courage, strength, and honor. It is proof that she is better than the rapist. While he was selfish, she can be generous. While he destroyed, she can nurture.

Adding to the Trauma

Many people assume that abortion will at least help a rape victim put the assault behind her and get on with her life. But evidence shows that abortion is not some magical surgery which turns back the clock to make a woman “un-pregnant.”

Instead, it is a real life event which is always very stressful and often traumatic. Once we accept that abortion is itself an event with deep ramifications for a woman’s life, then we must look carefully at the special circumstances of the pregnant sexual assault victim. Evidence indicates that abortion doesn't help and only causes further injury to an already bruised psyche?

But before we even get to this issue, we must ask: do most women who become pregnant as a result of sexual assault want to abort?

In our survey of women who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest, many women who underwent abortions indicated that they felt pressured or were strongly directed by family members or health care workers to have abortions. The abortion came about not because of the woman's desire to abort but as a response to the suggestions or demands of others. In many cases, resources such as health workers, counselors and others who are normally there to help women after sexual assault pushed for abortion.

Family pressure, withholding of support and resources that the woman needed to continue the pregnancy, manipulative an inadequate counseling and other problems all played a role into pushing women into abortions, even though abortion was often not what the woman really wanted.

Further, in almost every case involving incest, it was the girl's parents or the perpetrator who made the decision and arrangements for the abortion, not the girl herself. None of these women reported having any input into the decision. Each was simply expected to comply with the choice of others. In several cases, the abortion was carried out over the objections of the girl, who clearly told others that wanted to continue the pregnancy. In a few cases, victim was not even clearly aware that she was pregnant or that the abortion was being carried out.

"Medical Rape"

Second, although many people believe that abortion will help a woman resolve the trauma of rape more quickly, or at least keep her from being reminded of the rape throughout her pregnancy, many of the women in our survey who had abortions reported that abortion only added to and accentuated the traumatic feelings associated with sexual assault.

This is easy to understand when one considers that many women have described their abortions as being similar to a rape (and even used the term "medical rape), it is easy to see that abortion is likely to add a second trauma to the earlier trauma of sexual assault. Abortion involves an often painful intrusion into a woman’s sexual organs by a masked stranger who is invading her body. Once she is on the operating table, she loses control over her body. Even if she protests and asks the abortionist to stop, chances are she will be either ignored or told that it's too late to stop the abortion.

For many women this experiential association between abortion and sexual assault is very strong. It is especially strong for women who have a prior history of sexual assault, whether or not the aborted child was conceived during an act of assault. This is just one reason why women with a history of sexual assault are likely to experience greater distress during and after an abortion than are other women.

Research also shows that women who abort and women who are raped often describe similar feelings of depression, guilt, lowered self-esteem, violation and resentment of men. Rather than easing the psychological burdens experienced by those who have been raped, abortion added to them. Jackie wrote:

I soon discovered that the aftermath of my abortion continued a long time after the memory of my rape had faded. I felt empty and horrible. Nobody told me about the pain I would feel deep within causing nightmares and deep depressions. They had all told me that after the abortion I could continue my life as if nothing had happened.2

Those encouraging, pushing or insisting on abortion often do so because they are uncomfortable dealing with sexual assault victims, or perhaps because they harbor some prejudice against victims whom they feel “let it happen.” Wiping out the pregnancy is a way of hiding the problem. It is a “quick and easy” way to avoid dealing with the woman’s true emotional, social and financial needs. As Kathleen wrote:

I, having lived through rape, and also having raised a child “conceived in rape,” feel personally assaulted and insulted every time I hear that abortion should be legal because of rape and incest. I feel that we're being used by pro-abortionists to further the abortion issue, even though we've not been asked to tell our side of the story.

Trapping the Incest Victim

The case against abortion for incest pregnancies is even stronger. Studies show that incest victims rarely ever voluntarily agree to abortion. Instead of viewing the pregnancy as unwanted, the incest victim is more likely to see the pregnancy as a way out of the incestuous relationship because the birth of her child will expose the sexual activity. She is also likely to see in her pregnancy the hope of bearing a child with whom she can establish a truly loving relationship, one far different than the exploitive relationship in which she has been trapped.

But while the girl may see her pregnancy as a possible way of release from her situation, it poses a threat to her abuser. It is also poses a threat to the pathological secrecy which may envelop other members of the family who are afraid to acknowledge the abuse. Because of this dual threat, the victim may be coerced or forced into an unwanted abortion by both the abuser and other family members.

For example, Edith, a 12-year-old victim of incest impregnated by her stepfather, writes twenty-five years after the abortion of her child:

Throughout the years I have been depressed, suicidal, furious, outraged, lonely, and have felt a sense of loss . . . The abortion which was to “be in my best interest” just has not been. As far as I can tell, it only ‘saved their reputations,’ ‘solved their problems,’ and ‘allowed their lives to go merrily on.’ . . . My daughter, how I miss her so. I miss her regardless of the reason for her conception."

Abortion businesses who routinely ignore this evidence and neglect to interview minors presented for abortion for signs of coercion or incest are actually contributing to the victimization of young girls. Not only are they robbing the victim of her child, they are concealing a crime, abetting a perpetrator, and handing the victim back to her abuser so that the exploitation can continue.

For example, the parents of three teenaged Baltimore girls pleaded guilty to three counts of first-degree rape and child sexual abuse. The father had repeatedly raped the three girls over a period of at least nine years, and the rapes were covered up by at least ten abortions. At least five of the abortions were performed by the same abortionist at the same clinic.3

Sadly, there is strong evidence that failing to ask questions about the pregnancy and to report cases of sexual abuse are widespread at abortion clinics. Undercover investigations by pro-life groups have found numerous cases in which clinics agreed to cover up cases of statutory rape or ongoing abuse of minor girls by older men and simply perform an abortion instead.

In 2002 a judge found a Planned Parenthood affiliate in Arizona negligent for failing to report a case in which a 13-year-old girl was impregnated and taken for an abortion by her 23-year-old foster brother. The abortion business did not notify authorities until the girl returned six months later for a second abortion. A lawsuit alleged that the girl was subjected to repeated abuse and a second abortion because Planned Parenthood failed to notify authorities when she had her first abortion. The girl's foster brother was later imprisoned for abusing her.4

Finally, we must recognize that children conceived through sexual assault also deserve to have their voices heard. Rebecca Wasser-Kiessling, who was conceived in a rape, is rightfully proud of her mother’s courage and generosity and wisely reminds us of a fundamental truth that transcends biological paternity: “I believe that God rewarded my birth mother for the suffering she endured, and that I am a gift to her. The serial rapist is not my creator; God is.”

Similarly, Julie Makimaa, who works diligently against the perception that abortion is acceptable or even necessary in cases of sexual assault, proclaims, “It doesn't matter how I began. What matters is who I will become.”

That’s a slogan we can all live with.


Citations

1. Mahkorn, "Pregnancy and Sexual Assault," The Psychological Aspects of Abortion, eds. Mall & Watts, (Washington, D.C., University Publications of America, 1979) 55-69.

2. David C. Reardon, Aborted Women, Silent No More (Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press, 1987), 206.

3. Jean Marbella, "Satisfactory explanations of sex crime proved elusive," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31, 1990; M. Dion Thompson, "GBMC, doctor suspected nothing amiss," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31. 1990; "Family Horror Comes to Light in Story of Girls Raped by Father," Baltimore Sun, November 4, 1990; Raymond L. Sanchez, "Mother Sentenced in Rape Case," Baltimore Sun, Dec. 6, 1990.

4. "Planned Parenthood Found Negligent in Reporting Molested Teen's Abortion," Pro-Life Infonet, attributed to Associated Press; Dec. 26, 2002.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 521-524 next last
To: Hank Kerchief; annalex; wagglebee; bcsco; Raycpa
I certainly would regard an infant a human being, because it is born. All human beings are born. A fetus is not born and is not regarded as a human being either legally or Biblically. Notice that all ages are from the date of birth, not conception.

And this is the crux of the matter. The pro-abortion side has for years argued that the fetus is not a human being, the very argument you are using here.

A fetus is indeed a human being. It is living and growing and genetically the baby's DNA identifies it as a human being.

If you call the fetus not human, you are left with two problems. One is what IS it then? A dog? A cow? A fish? It doesn't magically turn into a human being upon passage through the birth canal.

The other is that it devalues the life and worth of the fetus. Murder is the killing of another human being. By declaring it *not human* then aborting it is not murder and can be justified legally.

While you keep saying that you oppose abortion, every argument you've been using is from the hard left pro-choice side.

61 posted on 04/05/2010 7:32:25 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: metmom; bcsco; wagglebee; houeto; annalex

It’s late and I’m tired. I’m not your enemy, I just disagree with you, and think what you want will ultimately produce the opposite of what you seek. Government is not the solution, as Ronald Regan said, “government is the problem.”

You will not like this, but please consider it:

http://usabig.com/iindv/articles_stand/soccult/abortion.php

If you do not like it, just make sure your dislike is rational, not emotional. Truth is truth, no matter how we feel about it.

Hank


62 posted on 04/05/2010 7:33:06 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; Mrs. Don-o

But since God doesn’t prevent abortions
____________________________________________

Ah yes He does...

God has ruled on abortion...

His verdict is...

THOU SHALT NOT KILL ..Exodus 20:13


63 posted on 04/05/2010 7:35:43 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
In the movie "Rob Roy" (Liam Neeson & Jessica Lange), Roy's wife is raped by an English lord. She becomes pregnant and isn't sure whether it is her husband's or the rapist's. When she tearfully tells her husband, "I tried to get rid of it, but I couldn't", Roy responds, It's not the child that needs killin'."

Hollywood said it best!!!

64 posted on 04/05/2010 7:36:20 PM PDT by Rytwyng (I'm still fond of the United States. I just can't find it. -- Fred Reed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

So you would turn her from an unwilling victim to a willing accomplise in the murder of her own unborn child...

make someone else a victim so she feels better...

Make her a perp so her suffering and victim days will end


65 posted on 04/05/2010 7:39:26 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; little jeremiah
He argues that to outlaw abortion is to put control in government, yet the legalizing of abortion, whether with, or without, controls does the same thing. He can’t have it both ways from a government intrusion stance.

Typical libertarian *rationalization* (for lack of a better word). They think that when the government rules the way that they think it should, that's lack of government interference, regardless of whether it really is. They demand things like the government not define marriage as between one man and one woman and what they fail to realize is that by doing that, the government ends up defining marriage as anything goes.

Likewise, they claim that the government legalizing abortion messes with the fate of the child, but by legalizing it, it determines the fate of the child.

As another FReeper once said...."Libertines want their immoral world view forced on everyone else, in the false name of “freedom”."

66 posted on 04/05/2010 7:40:42 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
Hank Kerchief wrote:
Apparently you do not believe what you defend is the truth, else you would not tell the lie that a fetus is [sic] and infant.
What say you, is a child before birth yet a child?
67 posted on 04/05/2010 7:41:45 PM PDT by narses ("lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; bcsco; wagglebee; houeto; annalex

And your demands that the government mind its own business will result in anarchy, which will inevitably lead to tyranny.

The government not taking action to protect its citizens is every bit as bad as the government dictating to all its citizens what they must do.

But the whole issue with abortion is that abortion is the murder of a human being, a human being that the government is obligated to protect. Allowing certain classes of people to murder other certain classes of people, puts one more at the mercy of the government than anything you are accusing us of.


68 posted on 04/05/2010 7:44:53 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

“An infant has been born, and fetus has not. I think even you can understand that.”

The Bible speaks several places in regards to the sanctity of the womb. Psalm 139:13 says:

“For thou didst form my inward parts, thou didst knit me together in my mother’s womb.”


69 posted on 04/05/2010 7:46:35 PM PDT by narses ("lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: metmom

bump


70 posted on 04/05/2010 7:47:18 PM PDT by Old Landmarks (No fear of man, none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

“An infant has been born, and fetus has not. I think even you can understand that.”

God tells Isaiah that He formed him from the womb too:

Isaiah 44:24: Thus says the LORD, your Redeemer, who formed you from the womb: “I am the LORD, who made all things, who stretched out the heavens alone, who spread out the earth — Who was with me?


71 posted on 04/05/2010 7:47:32 PM PDT by narses ("lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: KarenMarie
I think abortion is wrong. Rape, incest... it is wrong to kill an innocent baby.

Excellent point. Rape is wrong and so is incest. But does that mean that the baby is wrong? What is the baby's status in front of God?

But what about the cases of horrifically damaged fetuses?

My mother was an RN in a GP's office in the days when they did everything. She shared some stories with me. Basically, they did their best to allow the child to be born alive and then evaluated the child at that point. There was one child that she told me about that was born without a brain that they simply held and comforted and fed water for a few hours until she died. She was never alone, not for a single moment. The child was buried in a Catholic cemetary after having received baptism and last rites with as much honour as any priest or bishop.

The children that even looked remotely like they could live at all were taken to the best care that our city could give them. And there were some great success stories that came out of it. My cousin was 1 pound 2 oz at birth and now he is a very successful farmer, for instance. My opinion, for whatever it's worth.

72 posted on 04/05/2010 7:54:49 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: narses

If it were possible to completely assess our genome we would find that we are all descended from a rape and incest victim. Abortion in these cases creates yet another victim.


73 posted on 04/05/2010 8:00:18 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

Indeed.


74 posted on 04/05/2010 8:01:41 PM PDT by narses ("lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

MY neighbors adopted son was the offspring of an assault.

Great kid. Glad he didn’t die for the sins of his father.


75 posted on 04/05/2010 8:06:57 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

You can argue the morality of it as far as you want, and I doubt I’d disagree with you.

But, this isn’t a theocracy. How far would you want govt getting into that issue? I’d hope for the best but I’m not sure I’d want the govt to be the enforcer.

Govt, like fire, is a dangerous tool and a fearful master.


76 posted on 04/05/2010 8:09:47 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners, no mercy. 2010 is here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: metmom

“And your demands that the government mind its own business will result in anarchy, which will inevitably lead to tyranny.”

In all of history this has never happened. If you can provide even one example of when government “minded its own business” led to tyranny, please do so.

Abortion is not murder of a human being, and if that spurious argument is the only one you have against abortion, you have no argument at all. Abortion is wrong, but not for reasons you hold. So long as those are your only arguments the pro-abortionists will win.

Hank


77 posted on 04/05/2010 8:16:01 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I’m planning to ping this article and some more, just wasted today after getting ready for his trip, little sleep for days...

Can’t gather brains together to ping. Should just crawl up to bed.


78 posted on 04/05/2010 8:24:38 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

A theocracy is a government ruled by religious hierarchy. A government informed by moral absolutes is not a theocracy. Any government that is not founded on the moral absolutes that are generally universal in all religious is a gov like Communist China, Communist Russia, Zimbabwe or any other tribe ruled by a war chief.


79 posted on 04/05/2010 8:26:26 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

“If you can provide even one example of when government “minded its own business”...

Can you? What era, what gubnmint do you hold as your ideal?


80 posted on 04/05/2010 8:27:43 PM PDT by narses ("lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 521-524 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson