Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What About Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest? Women and Sexual Assault
Life News ^ | 4/5/10 | Amy Sobie

Posted on 04/05/2010 3:13:26 PM PDT by wagglebee

LifeNews.com Note: Amy Sobie is the editor of The Post-Abortion Review, a quarterly publication of the Elliot Institute. The organization is a widely respected leader in research and analysis of medical, mental health and other complications resulting from abortions.

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. Many people, including those whose mission is to help women and girls who are victims of sexual assault and abuse, believe abortion is the best solution if a pregnancy occurs.

Yet our research shows that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault don't want abortion, and say abortion only compounds their trauma.

“How can you deny an abortion to a twelve-year-old girl who is the victim of incest?”

Typically, people on both sides of the abortion debate accept the premise that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault want abortions. From this “fact,” it naturally follows that the reason women want abortions in these cases is because it will help them to put the assault behind them, recover more quickly, and avoid the additional trauma of giving birth to a “rapist’s child.”

But in fact, the welfare of a mother and her child are never at odds, even in sexual assault cases. As the stories of many women confirm, both the mother and the child are helped by preserving life, not by perpetuating violence.

Sadly, however, the testimonies of women who have actually been pregnant through sexual assault are routinely left out of this public debate. Many people, including sexual assault victims who have never been pregnant, may be forming opinions based on their own prejudices and fears rather than the real life experiences of those people who have been in this difficult situation and reality.

For example, it is commonly assumed that rape victims who become pregnant would naturally want abortions. But in the only major study of pregnant rape victims ever done prior to this book, Dr. Sandra Mahkorn found that 75 to 85 percent did not have abortions. This figure is remarkably similar to the 73 percent birth rate found in our sample of 164 pregnant rape victims. This one finding alone should cause people to pause and reflect on the presumption that abortion is wanted or even best for sexual assault victims.1

Several reasons were given for not aborting. Many women who become pregnant through sexual assault do not believe in abortion, believing it would be a further act of violence perpetrated against their bodies and their children. Further, many believe that their children’s lives may have some intrinsic meaning or purpose which they do not yet understand. This child was brought into their lives by a horrible, repulsive act. But perhaps God, or fate, will use the child for some greater purpose. Good can come from evil.

The woman may also sense, at least at a subconscious level, that if she can get through the pregnancy she will have conquered the rape. By giving birth, she can reclaim some of her lost self-esteem. Giving birth, especially when conception was not desired, is a totally selfless act, a generous act, a display of courage, strength, and honor. It is proof that she is better than the rapist. While he was selfish, she can be generous. While he destroyed, she can nurture.

Adding to the Trauma

Many people assume that abortion will at least help a rape victim put the assault behind her and get on with her life. But evidence shows that abortion is not some magical surgery which turns back the clock to make a woman “un-pregnant.”

Instead, it is a real life event which is always very stressful and often traumatic. Once we accept that abortion is itself an event with deep ramifications for a woman’s life, then we must look carefully at the special circumstances of the pregnant sexual assault victim. Evidence indicates that abortion doesn't help and only causes further injury to an already bruised psyche?

But before we even get to this issue, we must ask: do most women who become pregnant as a result of sexual assault want to abort?

In our survey of women who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest, many women who underwent abortions indicated that they felt pressured or were strongly directed by family members or health care workers to have abortions. The abortion came about not because of the woman's desire to abort but as a response to the suggestions or demands of others. In many cases, resources such as health workers, counselors and others who are normally there to help women after sexual assault pushed for abortion.

Family pressure, withholding of support and resources that the woman needed to continue the pregnancy, manipulative an inadequate counseling and other problems all played a role into pushing women into abortions, even though abortion was often not what the woman really wanted.

Further, in almost every case involving incest, it was the girl's parents or the perpetrator who made the decision and arrangements for the abortion, not the girl herself. None of these women reported having any input into the decision. Each was simply expected to comply with the choice of others. In several cases, the abortion was carried out over the objections of the girl, who clearly told others that wanted to continue the pregnancy. In a few cases, victim was not even clearly aware that she was pregnant or that the abortion was being carried out.

"Medical Rape"

Second, although many people believe that abortion will help a woman resolve the trauma of rape more quickly, or at least keep her from being reminded of the rape throughout her pregnancy, many of the women in our survey who had abortions reported that abortion only added to and accentuated the traumatic feelings associated with sexual assault.

This is easy to understand when one considers that many women have described their abortions as being similar to a rape (and even used the term "medical rape), it is easy to see that abortion is likely to add a second trauma to the earlier trauma of sexual assault. Abortion involves an often painful intrusion into a woman’s sexual organs by a masked stranger who is invading her body. Once she is on the operating table, she loses control over her body. Even if she protests and asks the abortionist to stop, chances are she will be either ignored or told that it's too late to stop the abortion.

For many women this experiential association between abortion and sexual assault is very strong. It is especially strong for women who have a prior history of sexual assault, whether or not the aborted child was conceived during an act of assault. This is just one reason why women with a history of sexual assault are likely to experience greater distress during and after an abortion than are other women.

Research also shows that women who abort and women who are raped often describe similar feelings of depression, guilt, lowered self-esteem, violation and resentment of men. Rather than easing the psychological burdens experienced by those who have been raped, abortion added to them. Jackie wrote:

I soon discovered that the aftermath of my abortion continued a long time after the memory of my rape had faded. I felt empty and horrible. Nobody told me about the pain I would feel deep within causing nightmares and deep depressions. They had all told me that after the abortion I could continue my life as if nothing had happened.2

Those encouraging, pushing or insisting on abortion often do so because they are uncomfortable dealing with sexual assault victims, or perhaps because they harbor some prejudice against victims whom they feel “let it happen.” Wiping out the pregnancy is a way of hiding the problem. It is a “quick and easy” way to avoid dealing with the woman’s true emotional, social and financial needs. As Kathleen wrote:

I, having lived through rape, and also having raised a child “conceived in rape,” feel personally assaulted and insulted every time I hear that abortion should be legal because of rape and incest. I feel that we're being used by pro-abortionists to further the abortion issue, even though we've not been asked to tell our side of the story.

Trapping the Incest Victim

The case against abortion for incest pregnancies is even stronger. Studies show that incest victims rarely ever voluntarily agree to abortion. Instead of viewing the pregnancy as unwanted, the incest victim is more likely to see the pregnancy as a way out of the incestuous relationship because the birth of her child will expose the sexual activity. She is also likely to see in her pregnancy the hope of bearing a child with whom she can establish a truly loving relationship, one far different than the exploitive relationship in which she has been trapped.

But while the girl may see her pregnancy as a possible way of release from her situation, it poses a threat to her abuser. It is also poses a threat to the pathological secrecy which may envelop other members of the family who are afraid to acknowledge the abuse. Because of this dual threat, the victim may be coerced or forced into an unwanted abortion by both the abuser and other family members.

For example, Edith, a 12-year-old victim of incest impregnated by her stepfather, writes twenty-five years after the abortion of her child:

Throughout the years I have been depressed, suicidal, furious, outraged, lonely, and have felt a sense of loss . . . The abortion which was to “be in my best interest” just has not been. As far as I can tell, it only ‘saved their reputations,’ ‘solved their problems,’ and ‘allowed their lives to go merrily on.’ . . . My daughter, how I miss her so. I miss her regardless of the reason for her conception."

Abortion businesses who routinely ignore this evidence and neglect to interview minors presented for abortion for signs of coercion or incest are actually contributing to the victimization of young girls. Not only are they robbing the victim of her child, they are concealing a crime, abetting a perpetrator, and handing the victim back to her abuser so that the exploitation can continue.

For example, the parents of three teenaged Baltimore girls pleaded guilty to three counts of first-degree rape and child sexual abuse. The father had repeatedly raped the three girls over a period of at least nine years, and the rapes were covered up by at least ten abortions. At least five of the abortions were performed by the same abortionist at the same clinic.3

Sadly, there is strong evidence that failing to ask questions about the pregnancy and to report cases of sexual abuse are widespread at abortion clinics. Undercover investigations by pro-life groups have found numerous cases in which clinics agreed to cover up cases of statutory rape or ongoing abuse of minor girls by older men and simply perform an abortion instead.

In 2002 a judge found a Planned Parenthood affiliate in Arizona negligent for failing to report a case in which a 13-year-old girl was impregnated and taken for an abortion by her 23-year-old foster brother. The abortion business did not notify authorities until the girl returned six months later for a second abortion. A lawsuit alleged that the girl was subjected to repeated abuse and a second abortion because Planned Parenthood failed to notify authorities when she had her first abortion. The girl's foster brother was later imprisoned for abusing her.4

Finally, we must recognize that children conceived through sexual assault also deserve to have their voices heard. Rebecca Wasser-Kiessling, who was conceived in a rape, is rightfully proud of her mother’s courage and generosity and wisely reminds us of a fundamental truth that transcends biological paternity: “I believe that God rewarded my birth mother for the suffering she endured, and that I am a gift to her. The serial rapist is not my creator; God is.”

Similarly, Julie Makimaa, who works diligently against the perception that abortion is acceptable or even necessary in cases of sexual assault, proclaims, “It doesn't matter how I began. What matters is who I will become.”

That’s a slogan we can all live with.


Citations

1. Mahkorn, "Pregnancy and Sexual Assault," The Psychological Aspects of Abortion, eds. Mall & Watts, (Washington, D.C., University Publications of America, 1979) 55-69.

2. David C. Reardon, Aborted Women, Silent No More (Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press, 1987), 206.

3. Jean Marbella, "Satisfactory explanations of sex crime proved elusive," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31, 1990; M. Dion Thompson, "GBMC, doctor suspected nothing amiss," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31. 1990; "Family Horror Comes to Light in Story of Girls Raped by Father," Baltimore Sun, November 4, 1990; Raymond L. Sanchez, "Mother Sentenced in Rape Case," Baltimore Sun, Dec. 6, 1990.

4. "Planned Parenthood Found Negligent in Reporting Molested Teen's Abortion," Pro-Life Infonet, attributed to Associated Press; Dec. 26, 2002.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 521-524 next last
To: xzins

It is the predictable de-evolution of a discussion.

Oh, I said evolution, I’m going to burn in hell.

Wait...saying that maybe some abortions might not be murder means I’m going to burn in hell...

But but but....Saying that the Son of God isn’t God puts me in hell...omg....oh noes!

Here’s the clincher...Sarah Palin isn’t perfect!


461 posted on 04/08/2010 7:25:15 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: verity

And I’m losing sleep over it. Wait. I haven’t gone to bed yet.


462 posted on 04/08/2010 7:32:31 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Truly, why would a person say he believes in God when he doesn't know Who He IS?

We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error. - I John 4:6

Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!

463 posted on 04/08/2010 10:00:22 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; P-Marlowe; wagglebee; Alamo-Girl; blue-duncan

Abraham ate with the Lord prior to the destruction of the cities of the plain.

Abraham saw the Lord when he ate with Him. And conversed and even negotiated.

That doesn’t make your “invisible” doctrine seem so cut-and-dried now, does it?


464 posted on 04/09/2010 3:24:15 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; xzins; P-Marlowe
It is the predictable de-evolution of a discussion.

Is that just your way of acknowledging that you don't have any Biblical references to support your denial of the Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ?

465 posted on 04/09/2010 4:57:42 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: xzins; P-Marlowe
That doesn’t make your “invisible” doctrine seem so cut-and-dried now, does it?

NONE of these made-up doctrines make any sense.

Say what you will about Joseph Smith, but at least he had the good sense to fabricate another book to explain away his inconsistencies.

466 posted on 04/09/2010 5:02:53 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’ve been advised to protect my pearls.


467 posted on 04/09/2010 5:39:36 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Jhn 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him].

Jhn 4:24 God [is] a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship [him] in spirit and in truth.

Col 1:15 (Jesus) Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:

1Ti 1:17 Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, [be] honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Num 23:19 God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

Your argument isn't with me it is with the Bible. It isn't my doctrine that God is invisible, it is clearly and unambiguously stated word for word...God is invisible.

You say Jesus is God and the Bible CLEARLY states the God is invisible so it is on you to tell us exactly where the Bible is wrong and you are right.

468 posted on 04/09/2010 5:50:13 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; xzins; P-Marlowe
I’ve been advised to protect my pearls.

By whom? Why are you so afraid to tell us what religious group you belong to?

469 posted on 04/09/2010 5:53:59 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; xzins; P-Marlowe
Col 1:15 (Jesus) Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:

Have you read the verses that follow this? They DESTROY your assertion. The colon is there for a reason. (This is from the KJV to keep things consistent.)

16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Colossians 1:16-17

470 posted on 04/09/2010 5:59:04 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; P-Marlowe; wagglebee; blue-duncan

The bible clearly says that Abraham ate with the Lord, conversed, and bargained with Him. It’s an EVENT fully recorded.

Are you saying the story is a lie?

Or are you saying you do not have the courage to “RIGHTLY DIVIDE the Word of Truth?”

You will deal with this, or we will all know that you are blowing smoke.


471 posted on 04/09/2010 6:08:57 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Mat 26:64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

Jhn 3:2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

Interesting that Jesus' enemies don't think he is God, they knew he wasn't and that he wasn't claiming to be God. They knew he was claiming to be the Son of God, the Christ, the Messaiah, and that claim threatened them greatly.

Jhn 9:11 He answered and said, A man that is called Jesus made clay, and anointed mine eyes, and said unto me, Go to the pool of Siloam, and wash: and I went and washed, and I received sight.

The blind man was there personally and knew Jesus was a man.

Jhn 19:5 Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And [Pilate] saith unto them, Behold the man!

Pilate was a first hand witness and called Jesus a man.

Act 2:22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:

Peter knew Jesus to be a man.

Rom 5:15 But not as the offence, so also [is] the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, [which is] by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

Paul declared Jesus a man.

1Ti 2:5 For [there is] one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

Yes, I use this verse a lot because it says so much and if one won't believe this verse they really won't believe any other verses IMO.

1Jo 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:

If one believes that Christ was a man that came in the flesh, then one is of God. If one doesn't...Seems to me that claiming that Jesus is God is denying that he came in the flesh!

1Jo 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that [spirit] of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
2Jo 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

It seems that even by the time John wrote these letters that people were already confusing God and Christ and John tries to set the record straight that Jesus is Jesus, a fleshly man, and God is his father. Those who see and understand the distinction are viewed differently than those who don't see or understand the difference.

I honestly figured that y'all knew enough about the Bible to understand the concepts without me having to quote the verse. I was wrong, y'all don't know the Bible well enough at all as evidences by denying that Jesus was tempted and denying that God is invisible. Wow. I'm astonished.

I am not going to list all the places where God calls Jesus his son or all the places where Jesus calls God his father. I've done enough spoon feeding.

472 posted on 04/09/2010 6:16:10 AM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; P-Marlowe; wagglebee

Deal with the story of Abraham or admit you don’t have the guts to do so.

Throwing up a bunch of cut and pasted verses means nothing.

Is the story of Abraham and the Lord a lie?


473 posted on 04/09/2010 6:17:51 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Eagle Eye; xzins; Buggman
I basically entered this debate by coming to the defense of Eagle Eye, but I must say that I believe that anyone who engages in a theological debate who refuses to divulge what church he attends or which sect he belongs to is being disengenuous to the point of being dishonest.

Obviously whatever religious background Eagle Eye has, it is a source of embarasent and shame. Based upon his grossly heretical theology, I'd have to say I can sympathize with his shame.

474 posted on 04/09/2010 6:18:25 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The bible clearly says that Abraham ate with the Lord, conversed, and bargained with Him. It’s an EVENT fully recorded.

It is truly shameful that you do not realize that God Almighty was referred to as Lord over and over and over in the Old Testament. OMG, children understand that!

Honest question: What do you know about figures of speech? How many in the Bible can you identify? Do you know when you are reading them? Anthropomorphism? Metaphor? Hypocatastasis? Asyndeton? Polysyndeton?

If one doesn't understand when one is reading a figure of speech, and they don't all appear in the English, then one won't know when one is reading something that is not literal but figurative in order to emphasize something.

For instance, do the clouds literally cry? Does the ground literally drink water? Do trees literally clap? Does God, who is spirit, have literal hands? Is the word literally seeds?

Do each of my questions require an individual answer? No, they are illustrative.

475 posted on 04/09/2010 6:30:43 AM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
believe that anyone who engages in a theological debate who refuses to divulge what church he attends or which sect he belongs to is being disengenuous to the point of being dishonest. Yes, the well worn tactic of discrediting the messenger instead of refuting the message.

You are ducking the Bible by discrediting my past.

My past is irrelevant and not the focus on this no matter how hard you try to make it such.

Simply put, you really don't want to believe the Bible and are trying to find something in my past to justify your disbelief.

Your actions are similar to those who refused Jesus because they thought he was just a carpenter's bastard son.

And no, I'm not comparing myself to Christ, and I know that is where you're going next LOL.

476 posted on 04/09/2010 6:37:06 AM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; P-Marlowe; wagglebee; BibChr; Alamo-Girl
So, you are saying a clearly described, blow-by-blow story of Abraham and the Lord and the destruction of the cities of the plain is a

FIGURE OF SPEECH

That's how you deal with it???? That's the best you've got?

That's not deceived, EE, that's just plain ignoring the evidence before your very eyes....IGNORING THE EVIDENCE = IGNORANCE.

477 posted on 04/09/2010 6:43:49 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; xzins

I admittedly don’t get the flow here. What is your point about “Lord”? Odd you make a point about that, then use OMG, which is an acronym for a common violation of the third commandment.

Have you read Hebrew long? I’ve been reading it for about 35 years. Narrative style and poetic style are far from impossible to distinguish. What in the Hebrew text of Genesis 18 do you find as markers that it is other than a narrative? I’ve found none.


478 posted on 04/09/2010 6:47:36 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; wagglebee; xzins; Buggman; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
It is truly shameful that you do not realize that God Almighty was referred to as Lord over and over and over in the Old Testament.

I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. (Rev 1:8)

Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea. (Rev 1:11)

And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks; And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters. And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength. And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not;I am the first and the last,: I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death. (Rev 1:12-18)

And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely. He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. (Rev 21:6-7)

And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. (Rev 22:12-13)

He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus. (Rev 22:20)

.

And that is why it is called "The Book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ"!!!

479 posted on 04/09/2010 6:49:36 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: xzins
You have the problem with the story of Abraham and God. You are getting rather silly about it making dares and calling me a chicken...did those tactics work for you in grade school?

Are you serious about not understanding that the word "Lord" in the Old Testament referred to God Almighty?

C'mon, let's discuss this at a level above 3rd grade Sunday School, ok?

The word Lord = Jehova and that does not equal Jesus Christ.

One would think that you would understand that God Almighty was referred to as Jehova over and over and over again....The Lord of hosts, the Lord healer, the Lord provider, etc etc etc.

Facepalm!

480 posted on 04/09/2010 6:50:00 AM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 521-524 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson