[P-Marlowe]

I basically entered this debate by coming to the defense of Eagle Eye, but I must say that I believe that anyone who engages in a theological debate who refuses to divulge what church he attends or which sect he belongs to is being disengenuous to the point of being dishonest.

Obviously whatever religious background Eagle Eye has, it is a source of embarasent and shame. Based upon his grossly heretical theology, I'd have to say I can sympathize with his shame.

[Eagle Eye]

believe that anyone who engages in a theological debate who refuses to divulge what church he attends or which sect he belongs to is being disengenuous to the point of being dishonest. Yes, the well worn tactic of discrediting the messenger instead of refuting the message.

You are ducking the Bible by discrediting my past.

My past is irrelevant and not the focus on this no matter how hard you try to make it such.

Simply put, you really don't want to believe the Bible and are trying to find something in my past to justify your disbelief.

Your actions are similar to those who refused Jesus because they thought he was just a carpenter's bastard son.

And no, I'm not comparing myself to Christ, and I know that is where you're going next LOL.

[Buggman]

I'm less concerned about the fact that he holds heretical views than that he is so grossly ignorant of what the orthodox Christian teachings actually are. At least when I'm in a heterodox mood, I know what I'm being heterodox from.

Shalom.