Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What About Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest? Women and Sexual Assault
Life News ^ | 4/5/10 | Amy Sobie

Posted on 04/05/2010 3:13:26 PM PDT by wagglebee

LifeNews.com Note: Amy Sobie is the editor of The Post-Abortion Review, a quarterly publication of the Elliot Institute. The organization is a widely respected leader in research and analysis of medical, mental health and other complications resulting from abortions.

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. Many people, including those whose mission is to help women and girls who are victims of sexual assault and abuse, believe abortion is the best solution if a pregnancy occurs.

Yet our research shows that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault don't want abortion, and say abortion only compounds their trauma.

“How can you deny an abortion to a twelve-year-old girl who is the victim of incest?”

Typically, people on both sides of the abortion debate accept the premise that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault want abortions. From this “fact,” it naturally follows that the reason women want abortions in these cases is because it will help them to put the assault behind them, recover more quickly, and avoid the additional trauma of giving birth to a “rapist’s child.”

But in fact, the welfare of a mother and her child are never at odds, even in sexual assault cases. As the stories of many women confirm, both the mother and the child are helped by preserving life, not by perpetuating violence.

Sadly, however, the testimonies of women who have actually been pregnant through sexual assault are routinely left out of this public debate. Many people, including sexual assault victims who have never been pregnant, may be forming opinions based on their own prejudices and fears rather than the real life experiences of those people who have been in this difficult situation and reality.

For example, it is commonly assumed that rape victims who become pregnant would naturally want abortions. But in the only major study of pregnant rape victims ever done prior to this book, Dr. Sandra Mahkorn found that 75 to 85 percent did not have abortions. This figure is remarkably similar to the 73 percent birth rate found in our sample of 164 pregnant rape victims. This one finding alone should cause people to pause and reflect on the presumption that abortion is wanted or even best for sexual assault victims.1

Several reasons were given for not aborting. Many women who become pregnant through sexual assault do not believe in abortion, believing it would be a further act of violence perpetrated against their bodies and their children. Further, many believe that their children’s lives may have some intrinsic meaning or purpose which they do not yet understand. This child was brought into their lives by a horrible, repulsive act. But perhaps God, or fate, will use the child for some greater purpose. Good can come from evil.

The woman may also sense, at least at a subconscious level, that if she can get through the pregnancy she will have conquered the rape. By giving birth, she can reclaim some of her lost self-esteem. Giving birth, especially when conception was not desired, is a totally selfless act, a generous act, a display of courage, strength, and honor. It is proof that she is better than the rapist. While he was selfish, she can be generous. While he destroyed, she can nurture.

Adding to the Trauma

Many people assume that abortion will at least help a rape victim put the assault behind her and get on with her life. But evidence shows that abortion is not some magical surgery which turns back the clock to make a woman “un-pregnant.”

Instead, it is a real life event which is always very stressful and often traumatic. Once we accept that abortion is itself an event with deep ramifications for a woman’s life, then we must look carefully at the special circumstances of the pregnant sexual assault victim. Evidence indicates that abortion doesn't help and only causes further injury to an already bruised psyche?

But before we even get to this issue, we must ask: do most women who become pregnant as a result of sexual assault want to abort?

In our survey of women who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest, many women who underwent abortions indicated that they felt pressured or were strongly directed by family members or health care workers to have abortions. The abortion came about not because of the woman's desire to abort but as a response to the suggestions or demands of others. In many cases, resources such as health workers, counselors and others who are normally there to help women after sexual assault pushed for abortion.

Family pressure, withholding of support and resources that the woman needed to continue the pregnancy, manipulative an inadequate counseling and other problems all played a role into pushing women into abortions, even though abortion was often not what the woman really wanted.

Further, in almost every case involving incest, it was the girl's parents or the perpetrator who made the decision and arrangements for the abortion, not the girl herself. None of these women reported having any input into the decision. Each was simply expected to comply with the choice of others. In several cases, the abortion was carried out over the objections of the girl, who clearly told others that wanted to continue the pregnancy. In a few cases, victim was not even clearly aware that she was pregnant or that the abortion was being carried out.

"Medical Rape"

Second, although many people believe that abortion will help a woman resolve the trauma of rape more quickly, or at least keep her from being reminded of the rape throughout her pregnancy, many of the women in our survey who had abortions reported that abortion only added to and accentuated the traumatic feelings associated with sexual assault.

This is easy to understand when one considers that many women have described their abortions as being similar to a rape (and even used the term "medical rape), it is easy to see that abortion is likely to add a second trauma to the earlier trauma of sexual assault. Abortion involves an often painful intrusion into a woman’s sexual organs by a masked stranger who is invading her body. Once she is on the operating table, she loses control over her body. Even if she protests and asks the abortionist to stop, chances are she will be either ignored or told that it's too late to stop the abortion.

For many women this experiential association between abortion and sexual assault is very strong. It is especially strong for women who have a prior history of sexual assault, whether or not the aborted child was conceived during an act of assault. This is just one reason why women with a history of sexual assault are likely to experience greater distress during and after an abortion than are other women.

Research also shows that women who abort and women who are raped often describe similar feelings of depression, guilt, lowered self-esteem, violation and resentment of men. Rather than easing the psychological burdens experienced by those who have been raped, abortion added to them. Jackie wrote:

I soon discovered that the aftermath of my abortion continued a long time after the memory of my rape had faded. I felt empty and horrible. Nobody told me about the pain I would feel deep within causing nightmares and deep depressions. They had all told me that after the abortion I could continue my life as if nothing had happened.2

Those encouraging, pushing or insisting on abortion often do so because they are uncomfortable dealing with sexual assault victims, or perhaps because they harbor some prejudice against victims whom they feel “let it happen.” Wiping out the pregnancy is a way of hiding the problem. It is a “quick and easy” way to avoid dealing with the woman’s true emotional, social and financial needs. As Kathleen wrote:

I, having lived through rape, and also having raised a child “conceived in rape,” feel personally assaulted and insulted every time I hear that abortion should be legal because of rape and incest. I feel that we're being used by pro-abortionists to further the abortion issue, even though we've not been asked to tell our side of the story.

Trapping the Incest Victim

The case against abortion for incest pregnancies is even stronger. Studies show that incest victims rarely ever voluntarily agree to abortion. Instead of viewing the pregnancy as unwanted, the incest victim is more likely to see the pregnancy as a way out of the incestuous relationship because the birth of her child will expose the sexual activity. She is also likely to see in her pregnancy the hope of bearing a child with whom she can establish a truly loving relationship, one far different than the exploitive relationship in which she has been trapped.

But while the girl may see her pregnancy as a possible way of release from her situation, it poses a threat to her abuser. It is also poses a threat to the pathological secrecy which may envelop other members of the family who are afraid to acknowledge the abuse. Because of this dual threat, the victim may be coerced or forced into an unwanted abortion by both the abuser and other family members.

For example, Edith, a 12-year-old victim of incest impregnated by her stepfather, writes twenty-five years after the abortion of her child:

Throughout the years I have been depressed, suicidal, furious, outraged, lonely, and have felt a sense of loss . . . The abortion which was to “be in my best interest” just has not been. As far as I can tell, it only ‘saved their reputations,’ ‘solved their problems,’ and ‘allowed their lives to go merrily on.’ . . . My daughter, how I miss her so. I miss her regardless of the reason for her conception."

Abortion businesses who routinely ignore this evidence and neglect to interview minors presented for abortion for signs of coercion or incest are actually contributing to the victimization of young girls. Not only are they robbing the victim of her child, they are concealing a crime, abetting a perpetrator, and handing the victim back to her abuser so that the exploitation can continue.

For example, the parents of three teenaged Baltimore girls pleaded guilty to three counts of first-degree rape and child sexual abuse. The father had repeatedly raped the three girls over a period of at least nine years, and the rapes were covered up by at least ten abortions. At least five of the abortions were performed by the same abortionist at the same clinic.3

Sadly, there is strong evidence that failing to ask questions about the pregnancy and to report cases of sexual abuse are widespread at abortion clinics. Undercover investigations by pro-life groups have found numerous cases in which clinics agreed to cover up cases of statutory rape or ongoing abuse of minor girls by older men and simply perform an abortion instead.

In 2002 a judge found a Planned Parenthood affiliate in Arizona negligent for failing to report a case in which a 13-year-old girl was impregnated and taken for an abortion by her 23-year-old foster brother. The abortion business did not notify authorities until the girl returned six months later for a second abortion. A lawsuit alleged that the girl was subjected to repeated abuse and a second abortion because Planned Parenthood failed to notify authorities when she had her first abortion. The girl's foster brother was later imprisoned for abusing her.4

Finally, we must recognize that children conceived through sexual assault also deserve to have their voices heard. Rebecca Wasser-Kiessling, who was conceived in a rape, is rightfully proud of her mother’s courage and generosity and wisely reminds us of a fundamental truth that transcends biological paternity: “I believe that God rewarded my birth mother for the suffering she endured, and that I am a gift to her. The serial rapist is not my creator; God is.”

Similarly, Julie Makimaa, who works diligently against the perception that abortion is acceptable or even necessary in cases of sexual assault, proclaims, “It doesn't matter how I began. What matters is who I will become.”

That’s a slogan we can all live with.


Citations

1. Mahkorn, "Pregnancy and Sexual Assault," The Psychological Aspects of Abortion, eds. Mall & Watts, (Washington, D.C., University Publications of America, 1979) 55-69.

2. David C. Reardon, Aborted Women, Silent No More (Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press, 1987), 206.

3. Jean Marbella, "Satisfactory explanations of sex crime proved elusive," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31, 1990; M. Dion Thompson, "GBMC, doctor suspected nothing amiss," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31. 1990; "Family Horror Comes to Light in Story of Girls Raped by Father," Baltimore Sun, November 4, 1990; Raymond L. Sanchez, "Mother Sentenced in Rape Case," Baltimore Sun, Dec. 6, 1990.

4. "Planned Parenthood Found Negligent in Reporting Molested Teen's Abortion," Pro-Life Infonet, attributed to Associated Press; Dec. 26, 2002.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 521-524 next last
To: MrB

Atheism is all about the individual doing exactly what they want, good and evil are replaced by selfishness and hubris.


161 posted on 04/06/2010 7:10:30 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
I do have two questions, however. If you believe God opposes abortion, why did God so often require His people to slaughter women with their babies?

You really have a confused notion of God's will, don't you. God is the creator of all things. God has the power to create, and to destroy. He does NOT pass that power along to us, however. Get it? And if God destroys what is in the womb, or what proceeds from the womb (yes, there are multiple references to that as well in the Bible), it is His will and usually because of what we have done to offend him. It is HIS judgment on man.

Abortion, however, is man's judgment on man. It is man's decision to abort what God has given because it's the easiest out.

The other question is, if God opposes abortion, why doesn’t he use His power to force people not to have them?

Way too easy. When Adam and Eve defiled God's creation, God gave us free will. We sin and are apart from God in this World. What brings us back to Him is believing in His mercy through the death of His Son. That is what gives us new life. We asked for this sorry state. Now we have it, and what we do with it will determine our ultimate fate. And as long as we continue to defile his creation (such as through aborting something precious that He freely gives) we will continue to live apart from Him.

162 posted on 04/06/2010 7:15:14 AM PDT by bcsco (Obama: Hokus Pokus POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; wagglebee
Err...ah...if you say so!

If you believe humans are capable of governing themselves without some minimal form of self government, then you are a fool. Sorry for the bluntness, but it's deserved. Apparently, you would be dissatisfied with even the government created by our founding fathers, our Constitution and Bill of Rights. After all, they offer a degree of government control. Thus, as wagglebee points out, you are truly an anarchist.

163 posted on 04/06/2010 7:18:58 AM PDT by bcsco (Obama: Hokus Pokus POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“Your logic is that if God doesn’t stop something it’s because He doesn’t oppose it.”

Of course that’s not my logic, silly. I don’t believe in God, how could I think He does or does not stop anything. And of course I don’t think a non-existent God condones anything either. It’s not my problem, it’s yours.

My logic is, if God doesn’t stop something, it’s because He can’t, because He doesn’t exist.

You believe in God, so must have some opinion about why God commands the slaughter of women and children and doesn’t stop abortions, or do you also think He can’t?

Hank


164 posted on 04/06/2010 7:23:32 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

The Constitution and this government were created by men who understood the true nature of mankind, ie, that which is espoused by the Christian worldview.


165 posted on 04/06/2010 7:25:17 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; metmom; xzins; bcsco; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; MrB; ...
Of course that’s not my logic, silly. I don’t believe in God, how could I think He does or does not stop anything. And of course I don’t think a non-existent God condones anything either. It’s not my problem, it’s yours.

Then why do you bring up God at all? And regardless, the ONLY logical conclusion from your previous statements is that if God doesn't stop something He condones it.

My logic is, if God doesn’t stop something, it’s because He can’t, because He doesn’t exist.

Again, why bring God up at all then?

Why don't you just argue in favor of abortion from your atheistic point of view?

You believe in God, so must have some opinion about why God commands the slaughter of women and children and doesn’t stop abortions, or do you also think He can’t?

Because He gave man free will.

166 posted on 04/06/2010 7:29:13 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Shake the dust off your sandals, dude...


167 posted on 04/06/2010 7:30:32 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: MrB; Hank Kerchief
The Constitution and this government were created by men who understood the true nature of mankind, ie, that which is espoused by the Christian worldview.

Yes, and Hank Kerchief is arguing against government control regardless of its nature. Not because of any Christian worldview, but because of libertarian ideals.

168 posted on 04/06/2010 7:31:14 AM PDT by bcsco (Obama: Hokus Pokus POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

“you are truly an anarchist”

As I’ve said before, I do not care if you want to think that, but I have fully explained why I cannot be an anarchist. Government is totally evil, but there will always be governments so long as societies are comprised of people like you who truly could not live, not deserve a free society. I do not oppose government.

http://usabig.com/atnmst/jrnl_ii.php?art=89

“you are a fool”

You are a hypocrite.

Mat 5:22 “... whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of the hell fire.”

Please don’t tell me any more about your religion you obviously do not believe.

Hank


169 posted on 04/06/2010 7:32:44 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

I bet you have “judge not” memorized (out of context) as well.


170 posted on 04/06/2010 7:34:20 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Hank Kerchief; metmom; xzins; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; ...

Well, there we have it. Hank has finally come out of the closet and announced his atheism. Yet he argues based on religious beliefs. Duplicitous to be sure. Also misleading and deceitful. That’s enough of this foolishness. He’s not interested in debate, only pulling chains. And not very adeptly, I will add...


171 posted on 04/06/2010 7:37:22 AM PDT by bcsco (Obama: Hokus Pokus POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; wagglebee
Hank, I always find it amusing that your followers of the Atheistic religion, which claims itself based on science, logic and fact are actually the most illogical, emotion based ranters of them all.

The absence of proof is not proof absence. Basic scientific principal that all the self styled “intellectuals” in the Church of Atheism always ignore to cling to their emotion based dogmas

You scream, over and over and over, “Because God does not make me a slave, he doesn't exist”.

That not logic or fact, that emotion and opinion. Your assumption does not logically follow the facts. You created a fraudulent straw-man argument and then simply ignore all fact, data and logic and demand everyone argue based on your opinion. Exactly what you accuse your opponents of doing!

As explained to you over and over and over on this thread, God has given man free will. Some men have choose to take the course of evil. That men make that choose does not indicate God does not exist, or that he he is powerless to stop it.

If God were to do what you demanded, make you a slave to his will, you would never know the existence of him since the possibility of anything opposed to God would not be comprehensible to your mind.

172 posted on 04/06/2010 7:39:28 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (We are sorry Senator, you have the Rinovirus. Afraid that is terminal. There is no cure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“Then why do you bring up God at all?”

Because it is your only argument against abortion.

“... why God ... doesn’t stop abortions ...”

“Because He gave man free will.”

I do not understand your answer. I know that Christians pray for things all the time expecting God to intervene in answer to their prayers. How does God’s intervention interfere in free will? If you pray that a person contemplating abortion not have it, and God answers your prayer, has that person’s free will been canceled? I think your answer is just an excuse. You know God can’t do it.

Hank


173 posted on 04/06/2010 7:44:58 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; Hank Kerchief; metmom; xzins; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; MrB; ...
Well, there we have it. Hank has finally come out of the closet and announced his atheism. Yet he argues based on religious beliefs. Duplicitous to be sure. Also misleading and deceitful.

I find the post below to be the most revealing (added emphasis is mine):

To: wagglebee; xzins; bcsco; metmom; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; floriduh voter

“Actually, you were.”

So now you read minds.

That makes you an anarchist, not a conservative.

Well I’m glad you didn’t tag me with that vile term “conservative” at least. As for anarchist, think what you like, though I’m not an arnarchist, I’m an independent individualist.

http://usabig.com/atnmst/jrnl_ii.php?art=89

“It’s amazing the dedication you show to abortion.”

Is name calling and false accusation a new Christian virtue. Has “though shalt not bear false witness” been revoked. I didn’t know.

Hank

139 posted on Tuesday, April 06, 2010 9:12:20 AM by Hank Kerchief

174 posted on 04/06/2010 7:45:55 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
On Free Will. Hank says "I do not understand your answer".

Of course you don't. And that is because you mindlessly cling to your emotion based dogma of militant atheism. You simply tune out all fact and logic to regurgitate your same list of emotion based slogans over and over and over and over.

What is so utterly amazing is that is the very thing you accuse Christians of doing!

175 posted on 04/06/2010 7:49:27 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (We are sorry Senator, you have the Rinovirus. Afraid that is terminal. There is no cure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Don't get worked up...

Matthew 10
11 "When you enter any town or village, find out who is worthy, and stay there until you leave. 12 Greet a household when you enter it, 13 and if the household is worthy, let your peace be on it. But if it is unworthy, let your peace return to you. 14 If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet (E) when you leave that house or town. 15 I assure you: It will be more tolerable on the day of judgment (F) for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah than for that town.

176 posted on 04/06/2010 7:49:41 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; bcsco; metmom; xzins; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; MrB; ...
Because it is your only argument against abortion.

Really?

I've made tens of thousands of posts on here about abortion. Almost none of them give God as a reason to oppose abortion.

I cannot tell whether you are a disingenous troll or merely obtuse.

I do not understand your answer. I know that Christians pray for things all the time expecting God to intervene in answer to their prayers. How does God’s intervention interfere in free will? If you pray that a person contemplating abortion not have it, and God answers your prayer, has that person’s free will been canceled? I think your answer is just an excuse. You know God can’t do it.

Your understanding of Christianity is far too distorted to address on an internet forum.

177 posted on 04/06/2010 7:51:08 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

Ha. For a man who doesn’t believe in God you throw His words around a lot. Too bad you don’t understand the context of what He is saying.

Your quote is from the Sermon on the Mount. And after the Beatitudes, He began speaking of what those who are under the law must do to earn eternal life. To sum up, they must be perfect for as it is written in Matt. 5:48 “You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”

But as I’ve pointed out, that’s impossible. We live in sin. “We all sin and fall short of the glory of God”. What then can we do? It is our faith that sets us free. It is our faith that is our salvation. We are still sinners because it’s our nature. But we know that God’s grace is ours. And in the end, being one of His flock, we will achieve eternal life. We no longer live under the law. The law has no control over us. (Make a note here, I’m speaking of God’s law, not temporal or earthly law).

Now, I said you would be a fool based on a premise. It must have struck because you had to go and pull that quote to throw back. So what I said worked, IMO. Thus, I see no reason to offer an apology. And, no, your total misunderstanding of my relationship with God has no influence on me. You can call me anything you want, chastise me for what YOU perceive to be a failing. But what you believe doesn’t count. And as long as you remain apart from God it never will. You see, I’m not the one with deep problems here...


178 posted on 04/06/2010 7:51:58 AM PDT by bcsco (Obama: Hokus Pokus POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I am not an atheist. I just don’t believe in God. There are lots of things I don’t believe in other people do. I don’t identify myself by what I don’t believe.

You will not find one word where I promote atheism anywhere. I have no objection to anyone else’s belief in God. I do not agree, but that is all.

What is wrong with you people? What do you care if I do not believe in God. I’m willing to accept your beliefs, even your Bible as the basis of discussion, but you don’t like that.

Sorry you’re upset, but you need not be. I’m no danger to your faith. I’ve written several defenses of Christianity, so just cool down, friend.

Hank


179 posted on 04/06/2010 7:53:49 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
I am not an atheist. I just don’t believe in God.

So, what deities do you believe in?

180 posted on 04/06/2010 7:57:48 AM PDT by bcsco (Obama: Hokus Pokus POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 521-524 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson