Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What About Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest? Women and Sexual Assault
Life News ^ | 4/5/10 | Amy Sobie

Posted on 04/05/2010 3:13:26 PM PDT by wagglebee

LifeNews.com Note: Amy Sobie is the editor of The Post-Abortion Review, a quarterly publication of the Elliot Institute. The organization is a widely respected leader in research and analysis of medical, mental health and other complications resulting from abortions.

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. Many people, including those whose mission is to help women and girls who are victims of sexual assault and abuse, believe abortion is the best solution if a pregnancy occurs.

Yet our research shows that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault don't want abortion, and say abortion only compounds their trauma.

“How can you deny an abortion to a twelve-year-old girl who is the victim of incest?”

Typically, people on both sides of the abortion debate accept the premise that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault want abortions. From this “fact,” it naturally follows that the reason women want abortions in these cases is because it will help them to put the assault behind them, recover more quickly, and avoid the additional trauma of giving birth to a “rapist’s child.”

But in fact, the welfare of a mother and her child are never at odds, even in sexual assault cases. As the stories of many women confirm, both the mother and the child are helped by preserving life, not by perpetuating violence.

Sadly, however, the testimonies of women who have actually been pregnant through sexual assault are routinely left out of this public debate. Many people, including sexual assault victims who have never been pregnant, may be forming opinions based on their own prejudices and fears rather than the real life experiences of those people who have been in this difficult situation and reality.

For example, it is commonly assumed that rape victims who become pregnant would naturally want abortions. But in the only major study of pregnant rape victims ever done prior to this book, Dr. Sandra Mahkorn found that 75 to 85 percent did not have abortions. This figure is remarkably similar to the 73 percent birth rate found in our sample of 164 pregnant rape victims. This one finding alone should cause people to pause and reflect on the presumption that abortion is wanted or even best for sexual assault victims.1

Several reasons were given for not aborting. Many women who become pregnant through sexual assault do not believe in abortion, believing it would be a further act of violence perpetrated against their bodies and their children. Further, many believe that their children’s lives may have some intrinsic meaning or purpose which they do not yet understand. This child was brought into their lives by a horrible, repulsive act. But perhaps God, or fate, will use the child for some greater purpose. Good can come from evil.

The woman may also sense, at least at a subconscious level, that if she can get through the pregnancy she will have conquered the rape. By giving birth, she can reclaim some of her lost self-esteem. Giving birth, especially when conception was not desired, is a totally selfless act, a generous act, a display of courage, strength, and honor. It is proof that she is better than the rapist. While he was selfish, she can be generous. While he destroyed, she can nurture.

Adding to the Trauma

Many people assume that abortion will at least help a rape victim put the assault behind her and get on with her life. But evidence shows that abortion is not some magical surgery which turns back the clock to make a woman “un-pregnant.”

Instead, it is a real life event which is always very stressful and often traumatic. Once we accept that abortion is itself an event with deep ramifications for a woman’s life, then we must look carefully at the special circumstances of the pregnant sexual assault victim. Evidence indicates that abortion doesn't help and only causes further injury to an already bruised psyche?

But before we even get to this issue, we must ask: do most women who become pregnant as a result of sexual assault want to abort?

In our survey of women who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest, many women who underwent abortions indicated that they felt pressured or were strongly directed by family members or health care workers to have abortions. The abortion came about not because of the woman's desire to abort but as a response to the suggestions or demands of others. In many cases, resources such as health workers, counselors and others who are normally there to help women after sexual assault pushed for abortion.

Family pressure, withholding of support and resources that the woman needed to continue the pregnancy, manipulative an inadequate counseling and other problems all played a role into pushing women into abortions, even though abortion was often not what the woman really wanted.

Further, in almost every case involving incest, it was the girl's parents or the perpetrator who made the decision and arrangements for the abortion, not the girl herself. None of these women reported having any input into the decision. Each was simply expected to comply with the choice of others. In several cases, the abortion was carried out over the objections of the girl, who clearly told others that wanted to continue the pregnancy. In a few cases, victim was not even clearly aware that she was pregnant or that the abortion was being carried out.

"Medical Rape"

Second, although many people believe that abortion will help a woman resolve the trauma of rape more quickly, or at least keep her from being reminded of the rape throughout her pregnancy, many of the women in our survey who had abortions reported that abortion only added to and accentuated the traumatic feelings associated with sexual assault.

This is easy to understand when one considers that many women have described their abortions as being similar to a rape (and even used the term "medical rape), it is easy to see that abortion is likely to add a second trauma to the earlier trauma of sexual assault. Abortion involves an often painful intrusion into a woman’s sexual organs by a masked stranger who is invading her body. Once she is on the operating table, she loses control over her body. Even if she protests and asks the abortionist to stop, chances are she will be either ignored or told that it's too late to stop the abortion.

For many women this experiential association between abortion and sexual assault is very strong. It is especially strong for women who have a prior history of sexual assault, whether or not the aborted child was conceived during an act of assault. This is just one reason why women with a history of sexual assault are likely to experience greater distress during and after an abortion than are other women.

Research also shows that women who abort and women who are raped often describe similar feelings of depression, guilt, lowered self-esteem, violation and resentment of men. Rather than easing the psychological burdens experienced by those who have been raped, abortion added to them. Jackie wrote:

I soon discovered that the aftermath of my abortion continued a long time after the memory of my rape had faded. I felt empty and horrible. Nobody told me about the pain I would feel deep within causing nightmares and deep depressions. They had all told me that after the abortion I could continue my life as if nothing had happened.2

Those encouraging, pushing or insisting on abortion often do so because they are uncomfortable dealing with sexual assault victims, or perhaps because they harbor some prejudice against victims whom they feel “let it happen.” Wiping out the pregnancy is a way of hiding the problem. It is a “quick and easy” way to avoid dealing with the woman’s true emotional, social and financial needs. As Kathleen wrote:

I, having lived through rape, and also having raised a child “conceived in rape,” feel personally assaulted and insulted every time I hear that abortion should be legal because of rape and incest. I feel that we're being used by pro-abortionists to further the abortion issue, even though we've not been asked to tell our side of the story.

Trapping the Incest Victim

The case against abortion for incest pregnancies is even stronger. Studies show that incest victims rarely ever voluntarily agree to abortion. Instead of viewing the pregnancy as unwanted, the incest victim is more likely to see the pregnancy as a way out of the incestuous relationship because the birth of her child will expose the sexual activity. She is also likely to see in her pregnancy the hope of bearing a child with whom she can establish a truly loving relationship, one far different than the exploitive relationship in which she has been trapped.

But while the girl may see her pregnancy as a possible way of release from her situation, it poses a threat to her abuser. It is also poses a threat to the pathological secrecy which may envelop other members of the family who are afraid to acknowledge the abuse. Because of this dual threat, the victim may be coerced or forced into an unwanted abortion by both the abuser and other family members.

For example, Edith, a 12-year-old victim of incest impregnated by her stepfather, writes twenty-five years after the abortion of her child:

Throughout the years I have been depressed, suicidal, furious, outraged, lonely, and have felt a sense of loss . . . The abortion which was to “be in my best interest” just has not been. As far as I can tell, it only ‘saved their reputations,’ ‘solved their problems,’ and ‘allowed their lives to go merrily on.’ . . . My daughter, how I miss her so. I miss her regardless of the reason for her conception."

Abortion businesses who routinely ignore this evidence and neglect to interview minors presented for abortion for signs of coercion or incest are actually contributing to the victimization of young girls. Not only are they robbing the victim of her child, they are concealing a crime, abetting a perpetrator, and handing the victim back to her abuser so that the exploitation can continue.

For example, the parents of three teenaged Baltimore girls pleaded guilty to three counts of first-degree rape and child sexual abuse. The father had repeatedly raped the three girls over a period of at least nine years, and the rapes were covered up by at least ten abortions. At least five of the abortions were performed by the same abortionist at the same clinic.3

Sadly, there is strong evidence that failing to ask questions about the pregnancy and to report cases of sexual abuse are widespread at abortion clinics. Undercover investigations by pro-life groups have found numerous cases in which clinics agreed to cover up cases of statutory rape or ongoing abuse of minor girls by older men and simply perform an abortion instead.

In 2002 a judge found a Planned Parenthood affiliate in Arizona negligent for failing to report a case in which a 13-year-old girl was impregnated and taken for an abortion by her 23-year-old foster brother. The abortion business did not notify authorities until the girl returned six months later for a second abortion. A lawsuit alleged that the girl was subjected to repeated abuse and a second abortion because Planned Parenthood failed to notify authorities when she had her first abortion. The girl's foster brother was later imprisoned for abusing her.4

Finally, we must recognize that children conceived through sexual assault also deserve to have their voices heard. Rebecca Wasser-Kiessling, who was conceived in a rape, is rightfully proud of her mother’s courage and generosity and wisely reminds us of a fundamental truth that transcends biological paternity: “I believe that God rewarded my birth mother for the suffering she endured, and that I am a gift to her. The serial rapist is not my creator; God is.”

Similarly, Julie Makimaa, who works diligently against the perception that abortion is acceptable or even necessary in cases of sexual assault, proclaims, “It doesn't matter how I began. What matters is who I will become.”

That’s a slogan we can all live with.


Citations

1. Mahkorn, "Pregnancy and Sexual Assault," The Psychological Aspects of Abortion, eds. Mall & Watts, (Washington, D.C., University Publications of America, 1979) 55-69.

2. David C. Reardon, Aborted Women, Silent No More (Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press, 1987), 206.

3. Jean Marbella, "Satisfactory explanations of sex crime proved elusive," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31, 1990; M. Dion Thompson, "GBMC, doctor suspected nothing amiss," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31. 1990; "Family Horror Comes to Light in Story of Girls Raped by Father," Baltimore Sun, November 4, 1990; Raymond L. Sanchez, "Mother Sentenced in Rape Case," Baltimore Sun, Dec. 6, 1990.

4. "Planned Parenthood Found Negligent in Reporting Molested Teen's Abortion," Pro-Life Infonet, attributed to Associated Press; Dec. 26, 2002.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 521-524 next last
To: metmom

I’m 100% against murder,
but I’m a “libertarian”
and don’t believe in imposing my beliefs on others...

/bigsarc


121 posted on 04/06/2010 5:46:13 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“Then what EXACTLY makes it a human being?”

Birth, or as your Bible puts it, “breath.”

Why do you say things about people that you do not know. If you really want to know why I’m opposed to abortion and would see it ended if possible (though I know it won’t happen in this world in our lifetime) you can read the article I referenced.

http://usabig.com/iindv/articles_stand/soccult/abortion.php

Of course you don’t have to read it, but please do not ask me questions I’ve fully answered there.

“Show us from Scripture where it says that abortion IS NOT a serious offense. Show us where it distinguishes abortion from murder.”

I did not say abortion is not considered a serious offense, I said the Bible does not consider it murder. I do not need to show you, Moses has already done that. Of course, if you refuse to read ....

I know what you are trying to pull. I could do the same thing. “Show us from Scripture where it says abortion is murder. Show us where it say an unborn child is a human being.” I’m not asking that, of course. It would be dishonest.

Hank


122 posted on 04/06/2010 5:47:42 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; wagglebee; xzins; bcsco; metmom; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; ...
I know exactly what the context of Ronald Reagan’s statement was. I’m not attributing anything to him.

Actually, you were.

I was not quoting it as authority, it was rhetorical for a principle, that government involvement in anything is always a problem.

That makes you an anarchist, not a conservative.

If you decide that government ought to have the power to decide medical issues, and what a woman must or must not do with regard to her unborn child, you’ve accepted that principle, and have no argument when the government decides a woman who already has one or two children must abort any additional children, and you have no argument against ObamaCare.

It's amazing the dedication you show to abortion.

123 posted on 04/06/2010 5:48:21 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Wow. Didn’t expect such rudeness and hostility from agreeing with you.

I think I’ll decline to respond in like and just let your assumptions speak for themselves.

I met Cal Thomas at a crisis pregnancy fundraiser. I was active in the program and supported the program as it successfully grew.

I’ve demonstrated outside of more than one clinic, one of which is now closed.

I’ve been hassled by the police for sitting in my car across the street from a clinic because the staff said they felt threatened by my presence. I was doing nothing but silently praying for the protesters in front of the clinic.

I’ve actually done more than most of the keyboard commandos here. Most are NATO...no action, talk only.

But the bottom line is that there is NOTHING one can do to stop a woman who has made up her mind.

The Bible doesn’t support life at conception.

Adam became a living soul with his first breath and leviticus says that the live of the flesh is in the blood.

The Bible doesn’t support a miscarriage (another name for abortion) as murder.

The penalty for causing a miscarriage was not the same as for a murder.

Funny about the fanatical subset of pro lifers here is that one can hate abortion, never encourage it, hope to never see it happen, yet still be labelled pro abortion by zealots.

They don’t mind heaping condemnation on women who are making the hardest and sometimes worst decisions of their lives.

Yeah, that’s Christian compassion, isn’t it? /s


124 posted on 04/06/2010 5:48:59 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

A living, growing fetus inside a mother is every bit as human before birth as after. It contains the same DNA it did at conception.

And you think that breathing makes it human?

just..... wow......

Such total denial of everything scientific and moral is staggering.

I take it then, that if someone shoots a pregnant woman in the stomach and the mother lives but the baby dies, you don’t think that the shooter should be charged with murder. After all, he didn’t kill a human being, he just injured one. The non-human lump of flesh just ceased it’s life functions, right?


125 posted on 04/06/2010 5:53:31 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
The Bible doesn’t support a miscarriage (another name for abortion) as murder.

WRONG!!!!. Miscarriage is NOT murder.

There is a world of difference between a miscarriage (accidental loss of the child) and the deliberate murder of a baby.

126 posted on 04/06/2010 5:55:31 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; xzins; bcsco; metmom; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; ...
Birth, or as your Bible puts it, “breath.”

So, a person on a respirator is not a human being?

Why do you say things about people that you do not know. If you really want to know why I’m opposed to abortion and would see it ended if possible

NOTHING you have said leads me to believe that you are actually opposed to abortion.

I did not say abortion is not considered a serious offense, I said the Bible does not consider it murder. I do not need to show you, Moses has already done that. Of course, if you refuse to read ....

In other words, you don't actually have any proof. The Bible DOES NOT distinguish abortion from murder.

127 posted on 04/06/2010 5:55:49 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: metmom

A miscarriage is the Divine deciding to take the life at that time. This is something that is ONLY within His authority, not within ours.


128 posted on 04/06/2010 5:56:38 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“when I knit you together in the womb, I knew you”
“the Lord detests hands that shed innocent blood”

Pretty plain.


129 posted on 04/06/2010 5:57:25 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: metmom

You can call me all the names you want but it seems to me that your religious zealotry has allowed you to misrepresent God’s word to suit your own agenda.

Are you getting your definitions of life and murder from the Bible?

Can you explain how the commandment can prohibit murder but God tells David to slay all, even women and children?

Or how the penalty for causing a miscarriage was not the same as murdering?

Or what about Jehu? I can only imagine what you’d call him and he was obeying God’s commands.

Adam became a living soul when he began breathing.

Leviticus directly says that the life of the flesh is in the blood. There is no blood at conception, so how can life begin at conception? At least Biblically speaking?


130 posted on 04/06/2010 5:58:19 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: metmom
There is a world of difference between a miscarriage (accidental loss of the child) and the deliberate murder of a baby.

Any chance you can support that with a Bible verse?

131 posted on 04/06/2010 5:59:44 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Can you explain how the commandment can prohibit murder but God tells David to slay all, even women and children?

WHO has the RIGHT to take human life? God does. Who are you to question Him? Your question explains itself.

132 posted on 04/06/2010 6:00:03 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Domandred
Capital punishment for the rapist, not the baby.

Agreed. Of the three parties involved in the act, the baby is the most innocent.

Note that I am not blaming the victim here.

133 posted on 04/06/2010 6:03:07 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; wagglebee; P-Marlowe; betty boop; Alamo-Girl
It does not say the babe is a human being. It is unborn, not a baby yet. Unborn babies move all the time. Just because something moves it does not make it a human being.

Not so, Hank.

The scripture says it "leapt with JOY." The joy was because it was in the presence of the expectant Mother of the Lord, who was carrying Jesus at the time.

In short, the BABY in her womb had awareness, realization, and spirituality. These are all characteristics of humans.

Fully human.

Age is marked from availability to be marked. They aren't likely to circumcize in utero, are they?

Age being counted from birth is no indication whatsoever of anything other than time of birth. No different than your counting the years since you graduated from high school. That doesn't prove you were an unintelligent mass before that point.

So far as the death penalty for causing an abortion, again you are wrong. The entire scripture says:

Exodust 21: 22 "If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman's husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.

The issue of premature birth with or without injury refers to THE CHILD. Otherwise, it makes no sense. If she's giving birth, OF COURSE, she is still OK. If you cause injury to the child, then it's "life for life....eye for eye", etc.

The law regarding deaths of already born persons is given elsewhere (numbers 35, for example)

This passage is specifically targeted at the unique case of a pregnant woman and the child being carried by her. If the woman is stricken and dies, it is covered under other law, as mentioned, regarding accidental and intentional taking of life.

Again, you greatly err. John, Jeremiah, Jesus, Job are all mentioned biblically from their in utero days and all are always regarded as fully human. How could it be otherwise, really, when you think about it?

134 posted on 04/06/2010 6:05:38 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: MrB

So if God says it is ok then that is good enough for you?

I mean, who are YOU to question God?


135 posted on 04/06/2010 6:06:09 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: metmom; xzins; bcsco; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; P-Marlowe; ...
And you think that breathing makes it human?

This has long been a favored argument of the abortionists.

It comes entirely from a single verse in the Bible, Genesis 2:7 when God breathes the Breath of Life into Adam's face and Adam becomes a living soul.

However, the abortionists overlook one very important fact and that is that Adam was CREATED EX NIHILO and God breathing the Breath of Life is a SINGULAR EVENT. God DOES NOT do this for anyone else, Adam's humanity passed to Eve WITHOUT God breathing in her face and it has subsequently passed to all of us without this as well.

136 posted on 04/06/2010 6:09:17 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

Show me where I’ve been questioning God’s will.
Nice try to turn it around like that.

If God has ruled on it, man should simply abide by that ruling. So, yes, if God says it’s OK, then I, as decorated dust, have no opinion other than that.

Now, where is it biblically stated that God is OK with
a person, on his/her own deciding with no divine direction
to kill an unborn baby?


137 posted on 04/06/2010 6:11:08 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Jer 1:5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, [and] I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.


138 posted on 04/06/2010 6:11:54 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; xzins; bcsco; metmom; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; floriduh voter

“Actually, you were.”

So now you read minds.

That makes you an anarchist, not a conservative.

Well I’m glad you didn’t tag me with that vile term “conservative” at least. As for anarchist, think what you like, though I’m not an arnarchist, I’m an independent individualist.

http://usabig.com/atnmst/jrnl_ii.php?art=89

“It’s amazing the dedication you show to abortion.”

Is name calling and false accusation a new Christian virtue. Has “though shalt not bear false witness” been revoked. I didn’t know.

Hank


139 posted on 04/06/2010 6:12:20 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; metmom
Can you explain how the commandment can prohibit murder but God tells David to slay all, even women and children?

Of course, if God decides to destroy a particular people it is a judgement and is not murder. God is a GOD, after all, and He knows best about those things. It is really no different than a shepherd deciding which sheep to cull from the herd.

How does the shepherd to the culling? Based on what?

140 posted on 04/06/2010 6:13:22 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 521-524 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson