Skip to comments.
Please FReep- Do you approve of Sarah Palin's comments?
KQV Radio ^
| March 30, 2010
Posted on 03/30/2010 3:58:15 PM PDT by all the best
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Let's hear it for the lovely Sarah. You can vote up to 8 times. Don't let her down. Poll in upper right, can't miss it.
To: dynachrome
To: all the best
3
posted on
03/30/2010 4:00:28 PM PDT
by
Texas56
To: all the best; 2ndDivisionVet; A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; AmericaUnite; ...
I approve! reload up to 8 times for this one!
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
4
posted on
03/30/2010 4:00:49 PM PDT
by
dynachrome
(Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
To: all the best
Can I hear a “hell yeah!” from the rest of ya’s to match my own?
5
posted on
03/30/2010 4:01:49 PM PDT
by
NurseZac
To: all the best
I have no problem with her “reload” comment. I do have a problem with her comments supporting Juan’s amnesty program.
6
posted on
03/30/2010 4:02:06 PM PDT
by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: all the best
vote up to 8 times. Nullify 7 leftards!
7
posted on
03/30/2010 4:02:49 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(www.JDforsenate.com)
To: all the best
Obama: "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun."
Just another State Media phoney issue!
8
posted on
03/30/2010 4:04:50 PM PDT
by
drpix
To: all the best
Freeped for the lovely Sarah 1011 votes (60% Yes - 40% No)
9
posted on
03/30/2010 4:05:54 PM PDT
by
BornToBeAmerican
(If you think education is expensive try ignorance.)
To: all the best
10
posted on
03/30/2010 4:08:49 PM PDT
by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: all the best
I voted yes, the second time it came on and said my 8 times are up, come back tomorrow.
11
posted on
03/30/2010 4:22:56 PM PDT
by
Friendofgeorge
( SARAH PALIN or BUST.)
To: all the best
12
posted on
03/30/2010 4:24:24 PM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT,NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
To: LS
Palin expands her position on Illegal Immigration
Palin: we need to close the borders. They are called illegal aliens for a reason and if they are not going to follow the rules they should not be in our country.
Its pretty simple I ratched that one down to the simple answer because its an easier answer than some politicians want it to make it be. you close the borders.
You get more agressive about cracking down on the illegal aliens and we take it serious what our border patrol officers are trying to do
December 2009
Lars Larson radio talk show
LARS: The amnesty proposal that was defeated in Congress in your view, was that amnesty for illegals and would you back amnesty for a path to citizenship, as the current president calls it?
SARAH PALIN: No, Im not for amnesty. Lets ratchet this down quite simply to remember what were referring to. Illegal aliens are called illegal for a reason.
We need to secure our borders and I am not for amnesty. And there are humane ways to deal with the 11-13 million illegal aliens who are in our country right now, but if theyre not going to follow the rules, they need to get out.
13
posted on
03/30/2010 4:25:41 PM PDT
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: all the best
I think Sarah could have repeated Ann Coulter’s statement that said to (paraphrasing) “do something mean to them and convert them to Christianity” applies to the US Democrats.
To: all the best
Thanks
Yes:69%
No:31%
Total Votes: 1,362
To: SoCalPol
I'll believe it when she says, plain and simple, I do NOT support John McCain's ideas on immigration. But notice, even McCain CLAIMS to want to "close the borders." That's not really the issue. This issue that got everyone worked up (rightly so) was not the continued stream of those coming in, but the possibility of making CITIZENS out of those already here. Even Grahamesty claims he's for "closing the border."
Let's see Sarah step up and say what she'll do about the 12 million HERE.
16
posted on
03/30/2010 4:29:08 PM PDT
by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: Texas56
With 1,380 votes it is Yes 69% and No 31%.
17
posted on
03/30/2010 4:29:55 PM PDT
by
ucsd1974
(A: Cow manure, Biden, Obama...Q: Name two fertilizers and one organizer.)
To: LS
![](http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/ii130/Kraut83/SDTJBORDER.jpg?t=1242516596)
San Diego - Tijuana, Mexico border crossing, largest and busiest in the world. I live 20 miles north of this and know the illegal situation first hand and one reason I support Sarah Palin
18
posted on
03/30/2010 4:35:33 PM PDT
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: ucsd1974
To: SoCalPol
Hey, no question that is the first step. But you’re missing the point. Virtually everyone “says” they want to control the border. Where you can find out if they are serious is what will they do about the next step, which is amnesty to those here? THAT will determine the next election and all future “border control.” If you’re for amnesty in any way, forget your picture. It will only get worse.
20
posted on
03/30/2010 4:43:42 PM PDT
by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson