Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Wraps McCain in Tea Party Movement
FoxNation.com ^ | 3/27/2010 | N/A

Posted on 03/27/2010 5:51:59 AM PDT by raybbr

Two years ago, John McCain transformed Sarah Palin overnight from an obscure first-term Alaska governor into a national celebrity when he picked her as his vice presidential running mate.
 
Now Palin is repaying the favor, putting her prestige on the line in an effort to help the four-term Arizona senator overcome his toughest re-election challenge ever.
 
The two campaigned together Friday for the first time since they lost the presidential race in 2008.
 
At the first of two rallies this weekend, Palin pumped up Tea Partiers, invoking the cause of the first Tea Party in 1773.
 
"Remember it was the Freedom Fighters and those who protested tyranny and big government," she said. "And that's what we're doing today."
 

"And when you think about that first Tea Party, shoot, some may claim that John was there, at the first Tea Party," she said with a laugh, poking fun at McCain's age. McCain, who is 73, grinned widely beside her.

(Excerpt) Read more at thefoxnation.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: az2010; mccain; palin; palin2012; palinisarino; palinmccain2012; palinsfolly; palintruthfile; votejdhaworthaz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 901-920 next last
To: indylindy

.
“Hell of a deal, isn’t it?”

.

For sure.

That the way it is with most of them. They don’t see what we’re up against, and don’t have the heart for the long battle.
.


821 posted on 03/28/2010 6:26:07 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Who is them? Also, answer my questions.


822 posted on 03/28/2010 6:28:15 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

.
I saw those question as facetious.

She’s obviously in, and as for if she’s not, I did already answer that.


823 posted on 03/28/2010 6:29:16 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 820 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

No, you didn’t. You only presume things.


824 posted on 03/28/2010 6:30:35 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 823 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
trying to divert attention...

Who's trying to divert attention? I already told you that I don't care about Sarah endorsing her former running mate. You, however, won't even say who you voted for in '08. The reason you won't answer this and other simple questions is because you reveal your agenda by doing so. Let's go back and forth some more. I'll ask you the same simple questions, you dodge them over and over, and then we can make this a 1000+ thread. Hurrah!

In other words you can't deal with the fact Conservatives...

I'm not even talking to a conservative. Do you really think a conservative would be afraid to answer a simple question like whether or not they prefer Palin over Obama in '12?

825 posted on 03/28/2010 6:31:21 PM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 794 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

.
“Them” is all the names put up in this thread as supposed “candidates.”

They’re all laughable, except that they were mentioned by freepers that have been here for years, so it really is sad. We’ve been watching their weak, limp-wristed antics in congress, and they’re just the Obamas of the Republican party. No experience at anything that matters, no vision of what we’re up against, and no heart for the battle.

Office fillers. - We can’t afford to mark time.


826 posted on 03/28/2010 6:35:51 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I have seen many wonferful people in Congress who fought their butts of opposing the healthcare bill.

You never answered my questions.


827 posted on 03/28/2010 6:38:11 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; rabscuttle385; AuntB
Sure, you keep up the lame poodle jokes, but you can't escape the fact that you are a COWARD, you waited until SJB was not going to be online for awhile to make your usual predictable spew and smears, and that has been well established all over FR.
Since when has there been time outs on Free Republic threads?


Don't even try to prop up that straw man, nobody ever said anything about 'time outs' but you waited until AFTER you knew SJB would not be posting to the thread for a while before you started up with your garbage KNOWING he would be unable to respond. People come and people go all the time from threads and it is a given that responses will be made when one poster or another is not online or able to answer back and everyone knows that. But in YOUR case, you KNEW that SJB would not be back, and that is what prompted you to show your ass with your judgmental post sneering about how SJB should "sit in the front pew of church" because he "obviously" (in your hypocritical eyes) needed "lots of preaching". You can spin it any way you like to, but it is clear to everyone that you are just one more pompous church lady cackling about a speck in someone's eye, when you can't even see the freakin beam lumber yard in your OWN eye.

And you and your snotty little 3rd Party pals have not been playing by Marquess of Queensbury rules, so why should we?

There you go again, making false accusations about "third parties", I've never advocated that, neither has SJB. But that doesn't stop you from lying about it.

Heck, most of the attacks against Palin coming from your clique take place either in the wee hours of the morning or late at night when we're all offline, so your whining is disingenuous in the extreme, so much so that it's laughable.

I post when I post. You're in the Eastern time zone just like me, so you can stuff that noise. Again, you're just trying to evade the fact that when you KNEW that another poster (SJB) would not be online for a while, you took that opportunity to smear him with a personal attack on his own spiritual state which is about as low as it gets.

But I'm confident that you'll descend even lower, you're already looking UP at the pond scum floating on the top of the water.

It's amazing how you can all dish it out, but when we throw it right back at you, you squeal like stuck pigs, just like liberals. So you keep your faux outrage because nobody cares.

More projection from you, Virginia. You are one of the premiere posters who ramp up the 'faux outrage' when someone isn't in agreement with you, and your one trick pony mentality produces the same response every time, which is to try and get that poster that you don't like suspended or banned.

You are utterly repugnant.
Why thank you very much.


That was no compliment, ya old bat.
828 posted on 03/28/2010 7:21:47 PM PDT by mkjessup (Loyalty to our Constitution and our Republic comes BEFORE loyalty to Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
"enemies of freedom" my AZZ.

Chew on my tagline for a while and then give your head a shake.
829 posted on 03/28/2010 7:23:36 PM PDT by mkjessup (Loyalty to our Constitution and our Republic comes BEFORE loyalty to Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 803 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Don't even try to prop up that straw man, nobody ever said anything about 'time outs' but you waited until AFTER you knew SJB would not be posting to the thread for a while before you started up with your garbage KNOWING he would be unable to respond.


830 posted on 03/28/2010 7:33:35 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; stephenjohnbanker; Virginia Ridgerunner; CAluvdubya; SoCalPol; sarah fan UK; ...

I posted “FUSP!” and “FUJM!”

And I stand by my words.

That was vile and vulgar.

Not as vile or vulgar as Ms. Palin’s despicable betrayal of Tea Partiers by backing the ultimate CINO, one John Sidney McCain III!
- - - - - - -

This is the venomous hated that serves no useful purpose and rabscuttle385 is a PAULTARD, which it to say that he is a third party voter who has no ‘skin’ in the GOP. Ron Paul is a RINO in the true sense of the meaning.

PAULTARDS are the enemy. Sarah Palin is not the enemy.

Sarah Palin is a patriot and she speaks for millions of likeminded patriots across our nation.

She deserves our thanks, our support and our praise.

She does not deserve to be coronated, should she decide to run for the nomination.

Competition is a treasured American value and Sarah wouldn’t have it any other way and we shouldn’t either.


831 posted on 03/28/2010 7:41:20 PM PDT by onyx (Facts don't matter. Proof not required. Anything goes! Racial slurs, death threats.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 759 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Your one trick pony mentality on display again.

You are unable to refute the argument, you are reduced to the HTML equivalent of a cheap parlor trick.

Of course, that fits your personality to a ‘T’.


832 posted on 03/28/2010 7:50:44 PM PDT by mkjessup (Loyalty to our Constitution and our Republic comes BEFORE loyalty to Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Typical false dichotomy from the non-cons.


833 posted on 03/28/2010 7:54:48 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker; AuntB; sickoflibs; Virginia Ridgerunner
But in YOUR case, you KNEW that SJB would not be back, and that is what prompted you to show your ass with your judgmental post sneering about how SJB should "sit in the front pew of church" because he "obviously" (in your hypocritical eyes) needed "lots of preaching".

The RINO bots are always the same, eh?

834 posted on 03/28/2010 7:56:54 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: onyx; All
She [Sarah] does not deserve to be coronated, should she decide to run for the nomination.

Now if you could convince everyone else of that (those rabid supporters who swarm any and every less-than-praiseworthy post regarding Sarah Palin), there might be some progress.

The fact is, if Sarah and/or her supporters can't handle legitimate criticisms of her NOW, long before the primary season of 2012 begins, long before the GOP convention, then neither she nor they have any business promoting her candidacy.

Finley Peter Dunne - "Politics ain't beanbag"

If the Palin Campaign and supporters can't take the heat now, how are they going to take the heat from the 0bama Reelection Committee? Does anyone think they're going to be easier on her?
835 posted on 03/28/2010 7:57:25 PM PDT by mkjessup (Loyalty to our Constitution and our Republic comes BEFORE loyalty to Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
The RINO bots are always the same, eh?

Yep. Arrogance exceeding intelligence by a factor of 20.
836 posted on 03/28/2010 7:59:06 PM PDT by mkjessup (Loyalty to our Constitution and our Republic comes BEFORE loyalty to Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 834 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Hucksterberry is finished due to paroling murderers.

Romney is finished because Mass Care is going to throw Massachusetts into receivership.

Two IDIOTS that we won’t have to worry about ;-)


837 posted on 03/28/2010 8:06:01 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; onyx

.”If the Palin Campaign and supporters can’t take the heat now...”

.

The heat?

From 35 anti-freepers?

Thats all you idiots are, 35 rabid kooks that think that you have the right to disrupt the entire forum.

Think Sarah is feeling your heat? - Get a life fool.

Sarah Palin’s support is growing exponentially, and all the heat is coming from her fire. - Its burning your guts, and you cry out from the pain, but get used to it.

She has what it takes, as she has proven in spades, and all you can do is scream like a stuck piggie.


838 posted on 03/28/2010 8:07:30 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; All
”If the Palin Campaign and supporters can’t take the heat now...”
. The heat?
From 35 anti-freepers?


You don't get to define who or what is an 'anti-freeper', oh wait: it's anybody who doesn't agree with you. Carry on.

Thats all you idiots are, 35 rabid kooks that think that you have the right to disrupt the entire forum.

What disruptions is your fevered mind seeing? If it's only "35 rabid kooks" that doesn't speak very well of your 'superior' intellect, logic and reasoning now does it Mr "Editor-Surveyor"?

Think Sarah is feeling your heat? - Get a life fool.

You must be feeling some heat, you're going foaming-at-the-mouth nutz about no more than 35 (by your count) "kooks" who obviously are light years ahead of you, and that has you all wee-wee'd up.

Sarah Palin’s support is growing exponentially, and all the heat is coming from her fire. - Its burning your guts, and you cry out from the pain, but get used to it.

Well if it is truly exponential, we ought to see the swearing in ceremony before the end of this year. Get a clue, "Hyper Bowl" is not a sport you should be playing.

She has what it takes, as she has proven in spades, and all you can do is scream like a stuck piggie.

You don't even know that she's going to run for President. All the screaming and wailing is coming from a faction of her supporters who have gone so far over the top that Sarah herself would tell them (and you) to calm your asses down.

You're doing more harm than good to your 'cause'.
839 posted on 03/28/2010 8:16:14 PM PDT by mkjessup (Loyalty to our Constitution and our Republic comes BEFORE loyalty to Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; mkjessup

“From 35 anti-freepers?”

No, anti-RINOs.

It is clear that you are unable to differentiate between a RINO and a conservative. That is your problem, not ours.


840 posted on 03/28/2010 8:19:27 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 901-920 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson