Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Stupak desperately wants to vote for ObamaCare as long as he can get cover on the abortion issue.
1 posted on 03/21/2010 6:43:30 AM PDT by AlanD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: AlanD

God help us.


2 posted on 03/21/2010 6:44:20 AM PDT by MEG33 (God Bless Our Military Men And Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

And when your focus on an issue is the ‘cover’ you get for it, how genuine is your position?


3 posted on 03/21/2010 6:45:39 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

eff this guy. He is gonna be the one to push this through.


4 posted on 03/21/2010 6:45:54 AM PDT by chad_in_georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

I’m beginning to think Stupak is a diversion who was in the bag all along. I for one hope they all vote for it and lose it in November. Never ever trust a democrat.


5 posted on 03/21/2010 6:46:29 AM PDT by pnut22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Not everyone else is close, that darn Senate bill they can’t make changes to;

http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/late-push-yields-more-votes-for-health-bill-403891.html

House Democratic leaders were working to head off a possible revolt among 15 lawmakers upset that House-passed increases in Medicare reimbursements for local hospitals were removed from the legislation.

The latest bill contains Senate language that several Democrats said doesn’t do enough to overcome geographic disparities in Medicare reimbursements.

“We need to make sure providers are reimbursed more on value than volume,” said Rep. Ron Kind, D-Wis., who’s undecided on how he’ll vote Sunday.


7 posted on 03/21/2010 6:46:45 AM PDT by Son House ("Warning! Warning!" "That does not compute" "Danger, Will Robinson!""Oh, the pain...the pain!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Stupak so badly wants to vote for Obamacare. He needs some cover though.


8 posted on 03/21/2010 6:46:48 AM PDT by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

If Stupak falls for some executive order crap he is Judas.


9 posted on 03/21/2010 6:47:00 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD
An Executive Order is totally bogus and illegal. That will be immediately challenged and shot down by SCOTUS. The REAL part about an EO is a “smoke screen” by Hussian to get them to go along with him so they will change their vote. Obama is nothing but evil and will do Satan's work to get his job done.
12 posted on 03/21/2010 6:50:08 AM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD
Rush predicted this a couple weeks ago about Stupak. And Rush is always right.

Stupak is lost to us or he wouldn't have come out with this statement. It's a done deal.

Leni

14 posted on 03/21/2010 6:50:37 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Bill O'Reilly: 9/8/09: "Communism is not a threat to us anymore"-10/20/09: "Obama is not a Marxist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Executive order? What BS! I don’t see zero ever signing an executive order that would limit abortions. Besides, he can easily undo one executive order with another one.


15 posted on 03/21/2010 6:50:40 AM PDT by smokingfrog (You can't ignore your boss and expect to keep your job... WWW.filipthishouse2010.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Never trust Dims.

PRay for America


16 posted on 03/21/2010 6:50:42 AM PDT by bray (Throw All the Bums Out, starting with McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

The possible deal would focus on an executive order that would specify there would be no public funding for abortions in the healthcare bill. “

Doesn’t make sense...if Obama agreed to this, then he’d lose the support of all those who INSIST public funding be part of the bill.


18 posted on 03/21/2010 6:51:25 AM PDT by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

The problem with Executive Orders are that they can be rescinded as quick as they’re signed.


19 posted on 03/21/2010 6:51:31 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Stupak’s 15 minutes is about to expire... anyone stupid enough to believe that a POS that enthusiastically supports infanticide will create and sign an executive order denying its funding, should be charged for their oxygen... preferably at a rate higher than he or she can afford. If Stupak votes for this POS socialist encroachment he is nothing more than a gutless, liberal scumbag, which is nothing more than confirming the obvious for most here.


20 posted on 03/21/2010 6:51:56 AM PDT by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Stupak the Stupid is definitely a little light in the upper storey.

The abortionist leadership is wearing him down with talks, and keeping him from conferring with any of his colleagues who might (if they got together) help each other get some backbone to oppose this bill.

To oppose evil, we must be “as wise as serpents” (as the Bible says). We can’t depend on dummies like this guy Stupak. He’s simply a fool.


21 posted on 03/21/2010 6:52:18 AM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

The pro-lifers will sell you out every time.


22 posted on 03/21/2010 6:52:26 AM PDT by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

HA HA HA, if Obama gives him what he wants the pro-choice crowd will not go along with it.... unless....

all of them know it will just be a flat out lie. It will be an executive order with a “wink”.


23 posted on 03/21/2010 6:52:43 AM PDT by Reagan69 (The only thing SHOVEL-READY since BO's stimulus has been MICHAEL JACKSON (tammy bruce))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

How will this go over with the rabid pro abortion wing of the House?


26 posted on 03/21/2010 6:53:07 AM PDT by chad_in_georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Executive Ordered one day an unordered the next sounds like a deceitful plan there.


27 posted on 03/21/2010 6:53:37 AM PDT by vicar7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

The outcome of any vote by Congress on health care is irrelevant since Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution does not specifically grant Congress the power to regulate health care! Therefore the so called legislation on its face is Unconstitutional! The people are not bound to comply with an Unconstitutional act of Congress! This is a power regulated to the states per the 10th Amendment!

It is the reason why Idaho and Virginia have passed legislation blocking federal health care from being illegally imposed on the citizens of those states by reasserting their 10th Amendment rights and 34 other states considering similar legislation! This is the point people need to hammer home with their Congress critters!


29 posted on 03/21/2010 6:54:31 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson