AWESOME! LOL!
Posted on 03/20/2010 7:07:53 AM PDT by SE Mom
Edited on 03/21/2010 5:00:38 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
10 AM Rules Committee meeting (C-span2 LIVE all day)
11 AM Stupak press conference
12 PM Demonstration at the Capitol
3 PM Obama meets with the Democratic caucus
Sunday
2 p.m.: The House will debate for one hour the rules of debate for the reconciliation bill and the Senate bill.
3 p.m.: The House will vote to end debate and vote on the rules of the debate.
3:15 p.m.: The House will debate the reconciliation package for two hours.
5:15 p.m.: The House will vote on the reconciliation package.
5:30 p.m.: The House will debate for 15 minutes on a Republican substitute and then vote on the substitute.
6 p.m.: The House will vote on the final reconciliation package.
6:15 p.m.: If the reconciliation bill passes, the House will immediately vote on the Senate bill, without debate.
Were you able to confirm if Brian Wilson said that?
Text and picture from here
http://radiopatriot.wordpress.com/2010/03/20/capitol-hill-tea-partiers-from-rep-bill-poseys-camera/
Hat tip to Whenifhow
AWESOME! LOL!
This guy Rob Andrews is nothing but a schmuck.
I stand corrected :-)
No- looking to see if he tweeted it. Meanwhile- this is rich:
Dem Rep. Alcee Hastings: “All this talk about rules — we make ‘em up as we go along.”
9 minutes ago via HootSuite
Ouch in so many ways ;>)
;^D
RED ALERT: #CNN Ignores the DC Rally Email CNN News Tips http://www.cnn.com/feedback/tips/newstips.html /via @rightwingartist
Cartoon Network beats #CNN in rating. CNN is a FAKE news network. #tcot #healthcare
I love the way that Dave Camp is pulling out all “the special provisions” in the bill.
He’s naming them chapter and verse.
Levin is a Constitutional scholar and former Justice Dept. attorney, yes.
He has written a book “Men In Black” and in countless other ways shown his Constitutional bona fides.
Your question implies to me that supposedly the lady who called Rush had “worked on these types of cases”. She did not claim to have worked on such cases while in the Justice Dept. She just claimed to have worked there and she stated her views.
Levin said nothing wrong with her views, she just applied it to the wrong factual situation. The case before us has them trying to pass a Senate bill without ever bringing that bill to the House Floor. Levin said there’s no way to have 20% of members present to stand and demand a recorded vote on a bill that is not before the House.
And he would be correct on that.
"There ain't no rules here, we're trying to accomplish something. . . .All this talk about rules. . . .When the deal goes down . . . we make 'em up as we go along."
---Alcee Hastings
Oh geez. That sure sounds like CNN. What a joke. A speaker at the rally said earlier that NBC was reporting that only 2000 were in attendance!
Now, schmuck Andrews is trying to explain away all the “special provisions” but is not doing that well.
That’s a wonderful photo. Poor George is crying his eyes out right about now.
I stand corrected and I think you Dog ;)
Are you watching this on Cspan2 ? This is amazing- we never get to watch them in committee...I’m riveted.
I’m a junkie.
So now, they’re saying that the DEMS have been holding back a document from the Repubs on the committee?
Did anybody catch that?
ROTFLOL BUMP!!
Worth repeating:
Dem Rep. Alcee Hastings: “All this talk about rules — we make ‘em up as we go along.”
9 minutes ago via HootSuite
These idiots are screwing up so bad. If they keep up at this pace, Mark Levin’s lawsuit is going to have no problem being ultimately successful.
jonward11: Pelosi confirms executive order being discussed http://bit.ly/9CBbRq
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.