Skip to comments.
City agency halts church services at public housing unit...
AP ^
| March 6th, 2010
Posted on 03/06/2010 11:28:14 AM PST by TaraP
Edited on 03/06/2010 11:41:01 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
DALLAS - A Dallas church that has held Sunday worship service at a public housing apartment complex for the elderly for 14 years has been ordered to stop.
Dallas Housing Authority president MaryAnn Russ told the Dallas Morning News that the church services violate separation of church and state and the agency's contract with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which funds public housing programs.
(Excerpt) Read more at onenewsnow.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: bhohud; church; dallas; elderly; housing; hud; missinglink
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
1
posted on
03/06/2010 11:28:14 AM PST
by
TaraP
To: Admin Moderator
2
posted on
03/06/2010 11:29:04 AM PST
by
TaraP
(He never offered our victories without fighting but he said help would always come in time)
To: TaraP
The founding fathers had church services in the Supreme Court and Treasury buildings.
3
posted on
03/06/2010 11:29:49 AM PST
by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: TaraP
The church is gonna win this one. You can’t put people in government housing and then say, “since this is owned by the government, nothing religious can happen”. In this is the kernel of why that teacher was allowed to include God in his classroom posters. Just because someone is an employee of the state, you can’t take away their religious freedom.
That is because, as most of us here know, the phrase “wall of separation” is only a term used in someones letter to someone else. It is not part of the documents controlling how our government functions.
4
posted on
03/06/2010 11:31:17 AM PST
by
RobRoy
(The US today: Revelation 18:4)
To: TaraP
5
posted on
03/06/2010 11:36:12 AM PST
by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
To: TaraP
...MaryAnn Russ told the Dallas Morning News that the church services violate separation of church and state... I'm sorry MaryAnn, you braindead moron, but it is YOU who are violating their First Amendment rights and it is YOU who should be thrown in jail for doing it.
6
posted on
03/06/2010 11:37:40 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(A proud American-American since 1949.)
To: RobRoy
That is because, as most of us here know, the phrase “wall of separation” is only a term used in someones letter to someone else. It is not part of the documents controlling how our government functions.
The reason I know that is because of this great web site called Free Republic. I sure didn't learn it in public school, where a third of my 'Social Studies' textbook was filled up with praises for the New Deal. I remember we spent weeks on that and was ticked off that we glossed over the American Revolution, which had piqued my interest at an even younger age when we read Johnny Tremain.
Sadly, much of the general public spouts on about the "Separation Of Church And State" like it is some monolithic rule that makes mixing religion and government akin to combining bleach and chlorine. I've told people of the origin of the phrase "separation of church and state" and the looks on their faces are revelatory.
7
posted on
03/06/2010 11:40:03 AM PST
by
LostInBayport
(2010 - The Second American Revolution. The first shot was fired 1/19/2010 -- here in Massachusetts!)
To: TaraP
They have my personal approval to have church services there and since I help pay for that housing, that ought to mean just as much if not more than, Dallas Housing Authority president MaryAnn Russ.
8
posted on
03/06/2010 11:41:01 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
("0bama's not just stupid; He’s Jimmy Carter stupid”. - Don Imus)
To: TaraP
I just sent a link to the former Texas Solicitor General. He’s won numerous cases like this.
To: TaraP
The 1st says Congress is forbidden to pass a law that has anything to do with an establishment of religion or that prohibits the free exercise of religion.
Whatever law that funded the federal housing, if it effectively does either of those two things, is forbidden by the 1st.
Therefore, the LAW passed by Congress should be declared null and void if the Court rules that there is an establishment of religion or prohibition of free exercise.
Instead, the Court forbids religion, setting the 1st on its ear.
10
posted on
03/06/2010 11:43:47 AM PST
by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
To: LostInBayport
akin to combining bleach and chlorine. Ammonia and chlorine. Bleach already contains chlorine.
11
posted on
03/06/2010 11:44:27 AM PST
by
Fido969
("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
To: FlingWingFlyer
12
posted on
03/06/2010 11:46:10 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: mountainlion
LOC - THE STATE BECOMES THE CHURCH: JEFFERSON AND MADISONIt is no exaggeration to say that on Sundays in Washington during the administrations of Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) and of James Madison (1809-1817) the state became the church. Within a year of his inauguration, Jefferson began attending church services in the House of Representatives. Madison followed Jefferson's example, although unlike Jefferson, who rode on horseback to church in the Capitol, Madison came in a coach and four. Worship services in the House--a practice that continued until after the Civil War.
13
posted on
03/06/2010 11:46:12 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: TaraP
Which is more constitutional, a church service, or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development?
To: Fido969
Ammonia and chlorine. Bleach already contains chlorine.
Yep, I got that wrong. Of course it just proves my point about the wealth of knowledge on this site!
15
posted on
03/06/2010 11:49:41 AM PST
by
LostInBayport
(2010 - The Second American Revolution. The first shot was fired 1/19/2010 -- here in Massachusetts!)
To: mountainlion
The founding fathers had church services in the Supreme Court and Treasury buildings.
3 posted on Saturday, March 06, 2010 2:29:49 PM by mountainlion (concerned —————————that’s right because there is no such thing as separation of church and state....But no ONE religion can be the National (forced by government) religion....a deception of separation of church and state is just that, a deception.
16
posted on
03/06/2010 11:52:50 AM PST
by
Freddd
(CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
To: TaraP
There is nothing in the Constitution that says separation of church and state. It is a LIE by the Nazi and Communist anti-Americans who are anti-American scum.
Why do the media keep spreading this LIE? OH I forgot they are members of the Nazi and Communist brothers.
17
posted on
03/06/2010 11:53:04 AM PST
by
YOUGOTIT
(The Royal 100 Club is Acting the Same as the Roman Senate When the Republic Collapsed)
To: Myrddin
Interesting information. Thanks.
Most bozos engage in this "separation of church and state" garbage even when no such violation is present. These are overreactions to the fear that the piggies down at the aCLU will end up taking them to court and they just want to avoid the hassle and expenditures fooling around with our out of whack "legal system". In their desire to pacify the piggies down at the aCLU, they end up violating the rights of other Americans.
18
posted on
03/06/2010 11:55:35 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(A proud American-American since 1949.)
To: Vince Ferrer
Which is more constitutional, a church service, or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development? There's the crux of our problem.
The feds are all up in our business, causing conflict!
19
posted on
03/06/2010 11:57:28 AM PST
by
donna
(SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
To: Freddd
Separation of Church and State is given to us by the same people that gave us global warming, gun control, 401k collapse, and loss of civil rights.
20
posted on
03/06/2010 12:02:57 PM PST
by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson