Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/28/2010 9:01:11 AM PST by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: onyx; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

~~Joke of the day ... ;)


2 posted on 02/28/2010 9:02:50 AM PST by STARWISE (They (LIBS-STILL) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war- Richard Miniter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
Edwards epilogue: Does the press really vet presidential candidates? (Talk about a joke..)

IF they're Republican..

YES

3 posted on 02/28/2010 9:04:44 AM PST by evad (OBAMA is a Clear and Present Danger to This Nation..and...He doesn't learn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

I don’t think the Dems were “duped.” It was probably well known all along that this guy was an adulterer, fornicator and who knows what else. It’s ok to bash a Republican who is caught doing some misdeed. But for their own, the Dems turn a blind eye. Or they make excuses for them.

A FReeper said on another thread that we don’t have investigative journalism anymore, and that is so true. Part of it is due to budget cuts, but another part of it is that the mainstream media is so in bed with the liberal socialists, that it too will turn a blind eye to the sins of Democrats. Only when it becomes patently obvious that some misdeed is going down do they finally come out and do the tsk-tsk. Really, media doesn’t particularly care about the American public or about the future and well being of America in general. They pander to the socialists; that’s it.


5 posted on 02/28/2010 9:07:15 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

If Katie the Kopmmie gets an award for a chopped and creatively editted hit piece interview with Sarah Palin, then the Enquirer MORE than deserves a Pulitzer for finally getting the poop out on a scoop that almost everyone BUT the MSM knew to be happening.


6 posted on 02/28/2010 9:07:36 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Yet they (the MSM) had no problems reporting an untrue story about John McCain, and his supported mistress. It’s amazing what a double standard that was.


7 posted on 02/28/2010 9:08:06 AM PST by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Only the ones they don’t like.


8 posted on 02/28/2010 9:08:16 AM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

....the same press dumpster diving at Palin’s house to find the dirt takes everything libs say at face value.

But it’s not the journalists fault?????


10 posted on 02/28/2010 9:10:21 AM PST by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

ROSE: I don’t know what Barack Obama’s worldview is.

BROKAW: No, I don’t, either.

ROSE: I don’t know how he really sees where China is.

BROKAW: We don’t know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.

ROSE: I don’t really know. And do we know anything about the people who are advising him?

BROKAW: Yeah, it’s an interesting question.

ROSE: He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational (sic) speeches.

BROKAW: Two of them! I don’t know what books he’s read.

ROSE: What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?

BROKAW: There’s a lot about him we don’t know.


12 posted on 02/28/2010 9:11:35 AM PST by Track9 (Old worn out suits and shoes,..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
But he wasn't in love with them. He was in love with someone else—and it turns out it wasn't his wife.

Edwards, first & foremost, was in love with himself.

14 posted on 02/28/2010 9:13:09 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
While the media “usually does well” in vetting candidates, said presidential historian Michael Beschloss, “Edwards is a good case” in which it didn’t.

Michael Beschloss. Isn't this the guy who effusively told Imus on air that Zero's IQ was off the charts only to have to sheepishly reply to Imus when pressed that he did not know what Zero's IQ was?

15 posted on 02/28/2010 9:13:34 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

MSM rear guard action....


19 posted on 02/28/2010 9:15:50 AM PST by central_va ( http://www.15thvirginia.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Forget the lack of press scrutiny. Obama wasn’t even scrutinized by his opponent in 2008. All McCain could say was what a great guy Obammie is and better not say nofin’ bad ‘bout ‘im.


20 posted on 02/28/2010 9:19:02 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

The media vets GOP candidates thoroughly. The media only vets Dims they want to lose in the primary.

The good thing about this is it is an advantage to the GOP. The GOP has less worry about each presidential election fall in terms of major surprises about their candidate.

For example, no GOP candidate would have survived with the vast majority of his unit thinking he was not much of an officer in a short stint in Viet Nam. Heck no GOP candidate would have survived claiming to be in Cambodia under Nixon before Nixon took office.


23 posted on 02/28/2010 9:21:28 AM PST by JLS (Democrats: People who wont even let you enjoy an unseasonably warm winter day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

That’s funny... I think I remember quite a few judges who claimed that Obama was qualified to be President because he was ‘vetted’ by the media.

Hmmm, maybe we can’t trust them when they are BIASED?


24 posted on 02/28/2010 9:26:14 AM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


27 posted on 02/28/2010 9:30:00 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
Does the press really vet presidential candidates?

???

Not Democrats.
Freaking, duh.

On the other hand, the scumbags know where the Palin family buys its underwear.

29 posted on 02/28/2010 9:34:04 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

More propaganda from ONLINE PROPAGANDISTS. Thanks for posting.


31 posted on 02/28/2010 9:34:45 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
Anyone on this site knows the answer to this question:

Of course they vet Pres. Candidates, if....



...they are R's.

32 posted on 02/28/2010 9:39:58 AM PST by TruthWillWin (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
“News organizations just don’t have the horsepower to go out when there’s fields of eight people in each party to do the level of vetting it would take to uncover that,” Lemann said of the Edwards affair.

Lemann is a liar.
Did he not notice the planeloads of "journalists " who were dispatched to Alaska by the Democrat newsrooms?

35 posted on 02/28/2010 9:42:28 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
Nicholas Lemann, dean of Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism, said that there isn’t a “simple yes or no” answer when looking at whether Edwards was fully vetted. What news organizations can cover, he said, comes down to a question of resources.

Gimme a break! They often know things but refuse to disclose if it's a RAT.

We have good evidence that the LA Slimes knew about Edwards and Rielle in December 2007. We had several reports posted here at FR that the Slimes had a whopper of a story on a major presidential candidate that it was "agonizing" over printing. We knew then and there that it was one of the RATS because any Republican story would have been gleefully printed as soon as practicable.

In 2008 the NY Slimes had the story of the Obambi campaign colluding with ACORN in violation of federal election laws. To her credit the reporter wanted to go ahead. At the last minute the brass killed the story. We've heard the reporter's message on the answering machine telling the ACORN person what happened. Very ugly.

37 posted on 02/28/2010 10:03:04 AM PST by freespirited (We're not the Party of No. We're the Party of HELL NO!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson