Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party Seeks Recall of Dem. Senators
Newsmax ^ | 2-26-10 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 02/26/2010 11:35:02 AM PST by Tigen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: chrisser

I agree. It is up to the States, and if the states provide for recall in their constitutions, then it would be unconstitutional for the Federal Government to interfere.


21 posted on 02/26/2010 3:03:49 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I agree with you. Also, it’s a bad idea, that in the end will fail, wasting a ton of energy. Furthermore, Lautenberg, btw, could be recalled for the same reason.


22 posted on 02/26/2010 3:09:26 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Lying is not only uncivil but immoral))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: walford

It’s unseemly and any replacement politician brought in under such circumstances would be tainted.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Arnold in California wasn’t “tainted”.


23 posted on 02/26/2010 3:12:06 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: eater-of-toast
Article I Section 5 of the US Constitution states: “Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members[.]”

I've always thought that this might be a weakness in the Constitution, that if there were an sufficiently ruthless evil bunch in power with enough gall to deny, and ignore the results of elections adverse to them...they could hang on forever refusing to recognize being 'dis-elected' and never seating their replacements.

I would not put it past this current bunch:


24 posted on 02/26/2010 3:24:24 PM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
I would not put it past this current bunch[.]

Only fear can stop them, not scruples--they have none.
25 posted on 02/26/2010 3:56:36 PM PST by eater-of-toast ("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." -- Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I hadn’t been able to think of a good rationale for getting a recall campaign going for a congressman/senator, given its slim chances of unseating one, but here you’ve come up with one. A recall campaign would certainly provide a means of building momentum against an incumbent, even if you couldn’t get him out of the seat before the next election. I would just suggest that people be cognizant of the extreme unlikelihood of an incumbent congressman/senator being expelled over citizens’ policy disagreements (as opposed to illegal acts, extreme ethics violations, etc.) and allocate resources accordingly.

I bet even if a congressman/senator lost a recall referendum, though, even a good number of members of the other party in his house of Congress would vote against expelling him, for fear of the precedent it would set.


26 posted on 02/26/2010 4:04:11 PM PST by eater-of-toast ("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." -- Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

No back in 96 I used My nickname and the first # that popped into my mind. Then I was gone for a little over a year so bingo add 2 years. U couldn’t remember my old password. very simple.


27 posted on 02/26/2010 5:03:24 PM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
...the first test comes Tuesday, when a judge will hear oral arguments from the Sussex County Tea Party, which is trying to recall Sen. Robert Menendez, New Jersey Democrat. "Nine states, including 12 Democratic senators who are not up for re-election otherwise, could all be on the ballot with a recall," said Peter Ferrara, a lawyer for the conservative American Civil Rights Union, which is helping the tea partiers with their case. "Given what they're doing on health care this year, that's just going to be a huge boost to the recall effort."
We have a recall provision, it's called the Second Amendment. Thanks Tigen.
28 posted on 02/26/2010 5:45:07 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen

So Shall it be spoken, so shall it be done.


29 posted on 02/26/2010 6:50:02 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen

Why recall McCain ..?? He’s already on the ballot.


30 posted on 02/27/2010 9:28:53 AM PST by CyberAnt (Our RIGHTS are given to us by GOD; not Congress or the President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RC2

We have a recall provision in NY, but it has to be done in a short time and you need a lot of people to sign onto the petition.
It is near imposable to get done. :-(


31 posted on 02/27/2010 9:50:05 AM PST by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tigen

I thought there was some Constitutional provision that had been interpreted to prohibit recalls of federal officeholders.


32 posted on 02/27/2010 12:32:50 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Munz

It may be nearly impossible but it will never happen if the people don’t start. One thing about starting something like this is that it lets the people know it can be done and it lets the politician know that people are serious.


33 posted on 02/28/2010 9:03:19 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Your right, but what I fear is that you get so few signatures that it gives the wrong impression to the senators.
Perhaps they get the feeling that people actually approve of what they are doing.

If you get my drift.


34 posted on 03/01/2010 10:15:40 AM PST by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: detective
Recall Franken, he is only in the Senate because of ACORN voter fraud and the complicity of the Minnesota Sec of State.

That may be.....But had Norm Coleman actually acted like he had a set of balls, instead of the normal panty waisted ankle grabbing Republican that he was, He would have won.

35 posted on 03/07/2010 6:59:10 PM PST by HP8753 (Live Free!!!! .............or don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson