Skip to comments.
Poll: Rand Paul Easily Leads in Senate Race
The Washington Independent ^
| 2-24-2010
| David Weigel
Posted on 02/24/2010 11:17:49 AM PST by Christian_Capitalist
Poll: Rand Paul Easily Leads in Senate Race
By David Weigel 2/24/10 11:05 AM
For some reason, Kentucky U.S. Senate candidate Rand Paul never gets called the "frontrunner" in that race. Secretary of State Trey Grayson, seen as the favorite of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), still receives that title. But it's another day and another poll -- this one from Magellan Strategies -- showing Paul crushing Grayson. He has a nearly 2-1 lead, 44 percent to Grayson's 23 percent, and a whopping 31-point net favorable rating to Grayson's 11-point net favorable rating.
The secret to Paul's success? He's not seen as a fringe candidate, but as an embodiment of the Tea Parties -- which have a 67 percent favorable rating among GOP primary voters. And he's aided by the endorsement of Sarah Palin. Twenty-eight percent of Kentucky Republicans favor Palin in a hypothetical 2012 primary to only 4 percent who favor Paul's father, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas).
The younger Paul has been running a pitch-perfect campaign. One example: his rapid-fire response to an ad in which Grayson accused Paul of supporting "Obama's war on coal". Another example is this closing answer at a debate in Paducah. Watch how Paul trains his focus on the parts of hardcore libertarianism most popular with Republican voters.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; kittychow; ky2010; noobnutjob; randpaul; randpaulrealdeal; retread; retreadtroll; sarahpalin; victorkilo; zotbait; zotmebaby; zuluoscartango
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-187 next last
To: Darksheare
You are being too kind...I would introduce him to the Mine field 100 yard dash...
101
posted on
02/24/2010 4:59:37 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: darkwing104
That’s after the boxer and tee shirt sand crawl at noon.
102
posted on
02/24/2010 5:01:56 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: Christian_Capitalist
IBTZ...even Sarah said she was only in favor of Paul’s fiscal policy...which means in all other concerns (as we’ve pointed out for nearly 3 years now) that Paul and his progeny are basically nucking futs.
103
posted on
02/24/2010 5:05:06 PM PST
by
OCCASparky
(Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
To: Christian_Capitalist
104
posted on
02/24/2010 5:08:43 PM PST
by
GQuagmire
( We are no longer Massholes)
To: Christian_Capitalist
Dumb noobies end up ZOT food. You won’t last long.
105
posted on
02/24/2010 5:17:51 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: GQuagmire; Christian_Capitalist
Lightning time!
To: darkwing104
I’ll have the electro-fried crunchy troll with the noob sauce on the side.
To: Christian_Capitalist
The premise of this thread is false. Even the pollster has admitted as much:
Pollster apologizes for omitting Bill Johnson from poll - admits that results are not accurate [KY]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 24, 2010
INTERVIEWS AND QUESTIONS: DAVID FLAHERTY 303-861-8585
MAGELLAN DATA AND MAPPING STRATEGIES APOLOGIZES FOR NOT INCLUDING BILL JOHNSON AND OTHER DECLARED US SENATE CANDIDATES IN KENTUCKY GOP PRIMARY SURVEY
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Louisville, CO – Magellan Strategies CEO David Flaherty today contacted US Senate candidate Bill Johnson and apologized to him personally for not including his name in Magellan’s February 18th survey of likely Republican primary voters. Magellan CEO David Flaherty stated “It was a gross oversight on our part and we sincerely apologize for any problems this may have caused to the Johnson, Grayson and other Republican US Senate campaigns in Kentucky.”
Flaherty continued, “The US Senate ballot test question from our February 18th survey is not accurate because Bill Johnson and other declared candidates were not included in the question. Without Bill Johnson and the other primary candidates included in the ballot test question the results are obviously not an accurate reflection of the Republican primary ballot that voters will choose from on May 18th.”
David Flaherty also contacted the Trey Grayson Campaign to apologize for the error.
FYI, the poll numbers that reflect reality, according to both the Johnson and Grayson campaigns, can be found HERE. They show Rand Paul in third, and the strength of his support to be very weak.
To: Christian_Capitalist
Run along, little girl. See yaaaaaaa.....LOL! You really don't want to make any friends around here, do you?
109
posted on
02/24/2010 7:12:26 PM PST
by
TXBlair
(My custom spring break shirt: I'm spending my $$ in Vegas... ...because Obama told me not to.)
To: OCCASparky
IBTZ...even Sarah said she was only in favor of Pauls fiscal policy...which means in all other concerns (as weve pointed out for nearly 3 years now) that Paul and his progeny are basically nucking futs.That's odd. She said nothing restricting her endorsement to fiscal policy.
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has endorsed Bowling Green eye surgeon Rand Paul in the U.S. Senate race in Kentucky.Palin said in a written statement that shes proud to support grassroots candidates like Dr. Paul. She said is lending her support because Paul, the son of former presidential candidate Ron Paul of Texas, wants to shake up the status quo in Washington.
In fact, when challenged by uber-dork William Kristol on her endorsement of Rand Paul, Palin jumped quickly to defend Paul's command of Constitutional issues as one of her main reasons for endorsement.
Asked by Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace why she endorsed Paul, Palin said Because hes a federalist and he wants the states to have more say and as we respect the 10th Amendment in our Constitution, he wants the states to have more say in a lot of these issues."
So, Sarah Palin supports Rand Paul because he's a good Constitutionalist.
Sounds like a great team to me!
To: EternalVigilance
That's fair enough. I would have liked to have seen the results with Johnson included.
Personally, I doubt he's above 5% statewide, but he deserves to be included. He does have some measurable support.
To: Christian_Capitalist; 50mm; paulycy; Darksheare; darkwing104; Allegra; Old Sarge
To: TXBlair
If Allegra is as tough as everyone seems to be saying, I doubt that she's so thin-skinned to be emotionally scarred for life by
my telling her to "run along, little girl"... I'm sure she'll be fine.
She said I looked like an idiot, I told her to run along. Sticks and stones and all that; I doubt that I actually hurt her feelings or anything. Sheesh.
To: fieldmarshaldj
You are starting to get pretty shifty for someone that I thought was honest.
First the "truther supported" was entirely too slick for an honest person, but putting a quote on Rand Paul that isn't his is blatant lying, that was him as a representative on his father's 2008 campaign in 2007 when he was answering questions about what the Presidential candidate believed, that is why he was saying HE says, He wants, HE believes.
114
posted on
02/24/2010 7:34:57 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
To: Servant of the Cross
Gee... sorry for the delay in response.
My wife and I had to go to dinner with the sound engineer and his wife from church, and then after dinner we had to record my next radio spot (on the Biblical argument against egregious taxation) for "Tea Time" Tea Party radio in Virginia.
I do have to take some off from the interwebs to go out and, y'know, actually advance conservative causes and stuff. My apologies for having to step away.
To: ansel12
So you support Junior Paul ?
116
posted on
02/24/2010 7:44:59 PM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
To: Darksheare; darkwing104
Thats after the boxer and tee shirt sand crawl at noon.In late July. :)
117
posted on
02/24/2010 7:51:12 PM PST
by
Allegra
(It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
To: John D
It sounds like Rand is as goofy as his dad. If this is so why would Sarah want to have anything more to do with him? She also endorsed McCrazy, but I bet she would never run with him again.Asked by Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace why she endorsed Paul, Palin said Because hes a federalist and he wants the states to have more say and as we respect the 10th Amendment in our Constitution, he wants the states to have more say in a lot of these issues."
To: fieldmarshaldj
I don’t support lying, this forum won’t be very good if people are just making things up, doesn’t that bother you even a little?
You didn’t deny, you didn’t defend, you simply tried a different tack, please address the lying first.
119
posted on
02/24/2010 8:22:22 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
To: LibertyRocks; Darksheare; darkwing104; Freedom_Fighter_2001; manc; reaganaut; WakeUpAndVote; ...
Hed be clinging to your skirts if he followed you for a day of work! ROFLMAOThat flaming anti-war spam monkey would likely lose control of his bladder and begin weeping like a little girl at the sound of a heavy door slamming. ;-)
120
posted on
02/24/2010 9:10:39 PM PST
by
Allegra
(It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson