Skip to comments.
Ron Paul wins straw poll at conference of conservative activists
Cox News ^
| 2-20-10
| Associated Press
Posted on 02/20/2010 4:20:13 PM PST by cajuncow
Edited on 02/20/2010 4:36:58 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
WASHINGTON (Associated Press) -- Rep. Ron Paul won the most support for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination in an unofficial straw poll of conservative activists attending an annual conference.
(Excerpt) Read more at ww2.cox.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; 2012strawpolls; braindeadzombiecult; cpac2010; cpacrinofest; cpacsux; paulestinians; rinofarm; rinos4rinos; rinosatwork; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
02/20/2010 4:20:13 PM PST
by
cajuncow
To: cajuncow
The commie lib “media” is loving this.
2
posted on
02/20/2010 4:22:50 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(If the CIA and NASA are going to "monitor climate change", why the hell do we need the EPA?)
To: cajuncow
3
posted on
02/20/2010 4:27:30 PM PST
by
joe fonebone
(A third party does need the majority to control the house...they only need 10%)
To: cajuncow
Stacked crowd and now we know who was booing the speaker who criticized homosexuality. Thats why the speaker called out a Paul organizer and said they are now enemies.
4
posted on
02/20/2010 4:28:22 PM PST
by
icwhatudo
("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
To: icwhatudo
BTW-not only were gay activists there, so was code pink. (Developing)
5
posted on
02/20/2010 4:29:01 PM PST
by
icwhatudo
("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
To: cajuncow
Ron Paul is a nutty squirrel with incoherent ideas.
Having said that, he is more qualified than the current occupant - but so is Katie Couric.
He is far less qualified than Sarah Palin.
6
posted on
02/20/2010 4:30:03 PM PST
by
Notwithstanding
(Wer glaubt ist nie allein. Who believes is never alone.)
To: cajuncow
the AP only writes artciles about CPAC ...ONLY when there’s a libtard winning, or any side-story that’s lib-slanted.
This just means that Tea Party Nation is the new CPAC...instead of FUDGEPAC or whatever homo PAC it’s now called.
To: icwhatudo
BTW-not only were gay activists there, so was code pink.
Well those are going to be cut and run's biggest supporters. Who else but cowards and gays would support him? Except a couple truthers and mooslimes.
8
posted on
02/20/2010 4:33:42 PM PST
by
John D
To: cajuncow
Did Paul’s supporters FREEP the voting??
like some on this site, 8 votes each??
9
posted on
02/20/2010 4:58:27 PM PST
by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
To: cajuncow
WINNER!
SECOND PLACE
10
posted on
02/20/2010 5:02:54 PM PST
by
ansel12
( (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.))
To: cajuncow
Said on Fox tonight(Sirius radio) that 40% of the CPAC attendees were students and believe that is where 31% for Paul came from.Our univ. students have been so Noam Chomskeyed and otherwise brainwashed that they are incapable of the simplest analysis and are almost totally ignorant of our exceptional history and greatness as a country.
I like some of Paul's fiscal conservativeness, but he has some far out kookiness. I could only vote for him if he and O were the two choices.
vaudine
11
posted on
02/20/2010 5:06:15 PM PST
by
vaudine
To: cajuncow
Ron Paul is a crank. I don’t much care what the media takes pleasure in. It doesn’t matter.
12
posted on
02/20/2010 5:09:25 PM PST
by
Bahbah
(Only dead fish go with the flow)
To: All
“In 1988 Ron Paul was nominated by the Libertarian Party for president and ran against the Reagan agenda, at one point telling the Dallas Morning News, Reagan was a “dramatic failure” as President. Paul also said, “I want to totally disassociate myself from the Reagan Administration”, Reagan was “a failure, yes, in, in many ways”. Transcript of Paul’s remarks on Meet the Press. Also, see Youtube video of Paul on MTP.”
13
posted on
02/20/2010 5:12:17 PM PST
by
rbmillerjr
(I'm praying for Palin....if not I'll vote 4 conservatives...Mitt won't get my vote)
To: cajuncow
Ron Paul is a NUT and I will have nothing to do with him... period!
To: cajuncow
Why are they not reporting that it was 31% of 2,400 of the 10,000 people who attended?
To: cajuncow
He didn’t even give a good speech.
I hate his tatics. They are as bad ad the lefties. Plant your people.
16
posted on
02/20/2010 5:24:56 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Notwithstanding
17
posted on
02/20/2010 5:31:53 PM PST
by
Big Horn
(Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
To: cajuncow
Guess the lesson has not been learned...
DIG up Teddy Kegger and put him back!
18
posted on
02/20/2010 5:35:33 PM PST
by
gwilhelm56
(OBAMA ... Orwell's 1984 was a WARNING ... NOT a TEXTBOOK!!!)
To: cajuncow
Better him than Romney. Not that Paul isn’t a nut, Mittens doesn’t deserve the glory.
19
posted on
02/20/2010 5:39:31 PM PST
by
Sybeck1
(POTUS : Punk of the United States)
To: cajuncow
There were a lot of Rue Paul nuts there. The sample size was fairly large, about 2400 out of a crowd of 10K.
We’ll be hearing about this one for weeks and weeks.
On everything but foregin policy, Paul makes sense.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson