Posted on 02/20/2010 10:23:18 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Bookmark
Thanks! I was aware of the “culling,” but it was interesting to see the graphs. One would expect an immediate jump in temps at the time of the culling. But we don’t see that. Rather we see a more gradual increase, rather than an instant spike. I suspect the gradual increase is the result of temperature reading “adjustments.” If there had been a spike, everyone would have connected it to the removal of stations from the data base. And that would have been painfully obvious! I’m very suspicious of warmers, and their data.
Bookmark
Oh ,...but we have our SUV’s...
“notice how lucky civilization has been to have had stable warm temperatures”
Yes. I have noticed very much so.
My dad told me about that
That is a good one....
Thanks E for the ping. I’m almost to tired to keep focused but the charts and guts of this article have been posted before, if memory serves me correctly. But regardless, such articles should be given a chance by growing numbers to see.
I’d love to see Beringia emerge again, myself.
When my boss, who is a big global warmist (or was. I haven’t heard a whole lot recently), talks about sea-level rise and the endangerment of coral reefs, I ask him what the coral did after the end of the last glacial period when temperatures increased by many degrees C over a few decades and sea levels rose meters per decade instead of centimeters per century. If they kept up with a 100 meter rise in sea levels, they can handle anything they’re experiencing now.
I think this study is not reliable and there was an error somewhere in the analysis, assumptions, or local land deformation at the time of the event.
They say those islands were stable relative to the teutonic plates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.