Posted on 02/19/2010 7:35:34 PM PST by DesertRenegade
Ryan Sorba, from the Young Americans for Freedom organizations California chapter, was booed off the stage tonight at CPAC, for deriding CPACs choice to have GOProud attend CPAC, even going so far as to say he condemns CPAC. Not the sort of thing one would say when invited to speak at the biggest gathering of Conservatives who look to CPAC for guidance and networking.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightpundits.com ...
You are out to lunch! Their existence demands things!!! They have an agenda and it aint lower taxes.
Do not be deceived, God will not be mocked. Galatians 6:7
Wow! Well said!
We dont need their votes and we dont need them trying to force their agenda or anything else down our throats! If we surrender this line, the war IS lost. No “gay rage” here, it wasnt their sin that caused God to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah...it was their refusal to repent.
I'm getting there. Well, not for cats. I mean, cats? You serious? :-)
Every so often I remind folks that homosexuals are people too, and all the names I recognize on this thread would agree. But... there are some here that have no grace towards those with whom they disagree.
Also, there are homosexuals and former homosexuals here, so I try to remember that when posting and try not to alienate friends who might be struggling with same-sex attraction, although I often forget...
Um...yeah. Im thrilled to death that you are “pro-human” (what the frick is that???” Republicans dont loose election after election...First, Second, Repubs loose elections because they stray from their core values to act like liberal progressive deviants!
Oh this is small. I was one one (RCs against Prots)_ for about two weeks and i did not even begin till after 7,000 posts. It is now close to 12,000, while the longest is about 65,000 (a silly one)
Hudson kept his homosexuality in the closet, and never openly supported it. Most of America didn’t know he was gay, until he announced he had aids.
NOT an advocate.
Throughout the Constitution it expressly refers to "persons" having rights, though mostly in the Amendments (not excerpts to the Declaration of Independence which you posted earlier...and which have no legal authority)
Until, or unless, you get a USSC decision stating a fetus is a person you have no legal argument.
That's not to say you don't have a MORAL argument. That's only to say your contention that the US Constitution expressly protects the unborn is fallacious.
Therefore, the available remedies I mentioned earlier are your only option...judges (personhood), judges (10th Amendment, fighting in the states) and armed revolution.
Which do you choose...and with whom do you find common cause?
Ah, you’re a judicial supremacist. That explains quite a lot.
mr. wizard, you could ask yourself a question, "do you feel lucky"?
"You think people dont remember what youve said about yourself?"
Screaming_Gerbil replied:
"Normal people would have moved on from that. Especially after the Admin Moderator told us to both drop it. Please grow up."
That (highlighted in blue) sounds like a typical diversionary tactic synonymous with "don't look behind the curtain". No reason, no explanation.
What is behind the curtain?
Normal people neither promote nor practice sexual perversion.
It’s that simple.
If unborn humans are not persons, what the hell are they?
No doubt there were some adulterers who slept overnight there as well as womanizers. Does that make Reagan in favor of adultery? There is a difference between toleration and acceptance. You may want to believe he considered it all perfectly normal, but I think you’ll find evidence that he considered homosexuality a tragic form of mental illness, which is more or less what most psychologists thought at the time (and many still do, although they’d be blackballed for saying so).
I haven't even SUGGESTED that unborn humans are not persons.
What I've said is that there is no Federal Court that has ever found that to be the case.
Sheesh. There's lots of folks on this thread that are so obsessed they don't even READ what others post with an eye toward understanding it.
It was actually the worst kept secret in Hollywood. Where do you think the wedding rumors with Jim Nabors circa 1969 started?
Fair enough, but where does it leave the Christian Coalition?*
*If they are still around.
I was replying to this:
“Until, or unless, you get a USSC decision stating a fetus is a person you have no legal argument.”
Simple common sense that even someone of very low IQ, and illiterate, says that unborn humans are persons. Doesn’t take any legal decisions to know that.
It’s just that we’re so far down the road of evil that now whether humans are “persons” or not depends on some judges. Sick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.