Posted on 02/19/2010 10:08:00 AM PST by AreaMan
Hoskins said he's been in a struggle with RiverHills Bank over his Clermont County home for nearly a decade, a struggle that was coming to an end as the bank began foreclosure proceedings on his $350,000 home.
"When I see I owe $160,000 on a home valued at $350,000, and someone decides they want to take it no, I wasn't going to stand for that, so I took it down," Hoskins said.
Hoskins said the Internal Revenue Service placed liens on his carpet store and commercial property on state Route 125 after his brother, a one-time business partner, sued him.
|
Hoskins said he'd gotten a $170,000 offer from someone to pay off the house, but the bank refused, saying they could get more from selling it in foreclosure.
Hoskins told News 5's Courtis Fuller that he issued the bank an ultimatum.
"I'll tear it down before I let you take it," Hoskins told them.
And that's exactly what Hoskins did.
Man Says Actions Intended To Send Message To Banks
The Moscow man used a bulldozer two weeks ago to level the home he'd built, and the sprawling country home is now rubble, buried under a coating of snow.
"As far as what the bank is going to get, I plan on giving them back what was on this hill exactly (as) it was," Hoskins said. "I brought it out of the ground and I plan on putting it back in the ground."
Hoskins' business in Amelia is scheduled to go up for auction on March 2, and he told Fuller he's considering leveling that building, too.
RiverHills Bank declined to comment on the situation, but Hoskins said his actions were intended to send a message.
"Well, to probably make banks think twice before they try to take someone's home, and if they are going to take it wrongly, the end result will be them tearing their house down like I did mine," Hoskins said.
The bank claimed his home as collateral, Hoskins said, and went after both his residential and commercial properties.
Hoskins said he'd gotten a $170,000 offer from someone to pay off the house, but the bank refused, saying they could get more from selling it in foreclosure.
Hoskins told News 5's Courtis Fuller that he issued the bank an ultimatum.
"I'll tear it down before I let you take it," Hoskins told them.
And that's exactly what Hoskins did.
Man Says Actions Intended To Send Message To Banks
The Moscow man used a bulldozer two weeks ago to level the home he'd built, and the sprawling country home is now rubble, buried under a coating of snow.
"As far as what the bank is going to get, I plan on giving them back what was on this hill exactly (as) it was," Hoskins said. "I brought it out of the ground and I plan on putting it back in the ground."
Hoskins' business in Amelia is scheduled to go up for auction on March 2, and he told Fuller he's considering leveling that building, too.
RiverHills Bank declined to comment on the situation, but Hoskins said his actions were intended to send a message.
"Well, to probably make banks think twice before they try to take someone's home, and if they are going to take it wrongly, the end result will be them tearing their house down like I did mine," Hoskins said.
The home was legal collaterol for the loan, his destruction of the home is an act of fraud, he even admits it is to cheat the bank out of it’s money owed...
It appears to me that some one else wanted his home....and that is why the banks were not cooperating with him....duhhh!
This can still be worked out and everything will be fine. All Mr.Hoskins has to do is offer his home in its present condition to the city of Detroit. They will in turn with Barack Hussein Obama’s blessing buy it from him for the full value of $350.000 with stimulus money. After the sale is closed they will offer it up for sale to someone who would be willing to rehab it for the sum of $1.00 and all will be fine. In its current bulldozed condition it is still in better shape than most of Detroit’s public housing.
“Paying off the loan with the proceeds of the sale will clear the title.”
Not sure how that would have solved his business debts.
If someone/institution offered to pay off his mortgage for $170k, then he no longer can be the title holder, and would have still been forced to either vacate the property, or rent it out from the new owner.
And, with his home listed as collateral, there is no way for any other buyer to assume ownership of his property, even if they purchased it by paying off the mortgage balance - can’t transact the sale of the property if their is a lien placed on it. In this case, it was the bank that had it listed as collateral against his business loans.
Times are tough, and small businesses are in a fragile state, but if this person overextended himself and made some bad decisions in retrospect, it is not the bank’s fault. He did offer to put up the house as collateral.
One avenue for providing relief to small businesses that are on the brink of default would be TAX RELIEF, assuming that they were not running their business in an incompetent manner.
Wow. Talk about a damned fool. Oh, well ... he won’t have mortgage payments in prison, and the food is “free.”
They're not foreclosing on the structure, they're foreclosing on the loan, which no amount of bulldozing is going to erase.
What he did here, is destroy real property that the bank still owns.
He's going to jail. And deservedly so.
People are tired of getting pushed around by a non-responsive government and non-responsive corporations. I say good for Terry Hoskins!
Well, I can’t argue against speculation.
What you “know” apparently trumps facts.
When facts don’t make sense, its worth questioning whether the fact can be right. In this case — they can’t.
SnakeDoc
The sheeple are starting to fight back...
This is going to get ugly fast!
word...
Why, yes I do. Vin’s stuff is always entertaining and inspirational.
I’m angry. Stop confusing me with facts!
Looks like we’ve got similar libraries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.