To: 21twelve
Thanks, now I remember. You are right it was Panzer. It was actually a superior tank really, but my point is bigger is not always better.
39 posted on
02/12/2010 11:51:01 PM PST by
OneVike
To: OneVike
Well there were Panzer MKls, MKlls, MKllls, MKlVs, MKVs (Panthers), MKVls (Tigers), and more. The Sherman’s 75 could take out even Panthers and Tigers but not always...especially against their frontal armor. Our M4 Shermans had vertical stabilzation, decent armor, mobility, superior maintenance units, and numbers. We produced about 49,000 M4s during the war.
The Panthers were great tanks but only about 5000 were made. Tigers and King Tigers combined amounted to less than 2000 copies.
50 posted on
02/13/2010 12:16:42 AM PST by
Monterrosa-24
(...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
To: OneVike
The biggest reason that the Sherman was so effective was because the U.S. made so many of them. They simply out produced the German war machine in a significant way.
The Panzer Tank was a superior tank. The Russians also mde a very good and tough tank, but the Americans made a ton of tanks, planes, jeeps, liberty ships, rifles boots and every other war impliment needed.
52 posted on
02/13/2010 12:30:03 AM PST by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson