Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 21twelve

Thanks, now I remember. You are right it was Panzer. It was actually a superior tank really, but my point is bigger is not always better.


39 posted on 02/12/2010 11:51:01 PM PST by OneVike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: OneVike

Well there were Panzer MKls, MKlls, MKllls, MKlVs, MKVs (Panthers), MKVls (Tigers), and more. The Sherman’s 75 could take out even Panthers and Tigers but not always...especially against their frontal armor. Our M4 Shermans had vertical stabilzation, decent armor, mobility, superior maintenance units, and numbers. We produced about 49,000 M4s during the war.

The Panthers were great tanks but only about 5000 were made. Tigers and King Tigers combined amounted to less than 2000 copies.


50 posted on 02/13/2010 12:16:42 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike
The biggest reason that the Sherman was so effective was because the U.S. made so many of them. They simply out produced the German war machine in a significant way.
The Panzer Tank was a superior tank. The Russians also mde a very good and tough tank, but the Americans made a ton of tanks, planes, jeeps, liberty ships, rifles boots and every other war impliment needed.
52 posted on 02/13/2010 12:30:03 AM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson