Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BatGuano

BatGuano: “When the liar takes it too another level, for example, wearing the ribbon or the medal, this crosses the line.”

I don’t agree. Just because it’s immoral to lie about something doesn’t mean we should have a law against it. It depends on whether someone is harmed or defrauded in the process.

Sometimes we have to tolerate things we don’t like in order to protect the greater good. In this case, the greater good is protecting liberty. When restricting someone, the benefit of the doubt should go to the individual, not the state. In other words, prove there’s a vital state interest here where the lie does actual harm (not just cause veterans, of which I’m one, some discomfort).


14 posted on 02/06/2010 3:53:39 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Governor Palin backs RINO extraordinaire Juan McPain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: CitizenUSA
It depends on whether someone is harmed or defrauded in the process.

I think it defrauds those who have actually earned the right to wear those ribbons.

15 posted on 02/06/2010 3:55:57 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenUSA
Just because it’s immoral to lie about something doesn’t mean we should have a law against it.

What you or I think is bad law does not necessarily make it unconstitutional.

16 posted on 02/06/2010 3:56:46 PM PST by Jacquerie (We live in a Judicial Tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenUSA

Well stated.


17 posted on 02/06/2010 3:57:24 PM PST by Steve_Stifler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson