And when the magician controls the magic wand, he smugly believes he can spin the story to his liking, such as: The “unchanged behavior” to which I refer has (in this discussion) been limited to the time frame of the last 2000 years.
As with all post moderns, you obviously believe that whatever you say is your personal ‘truth’ and everyone else must accept the ebb and flow of your fantastical nonsense. I don’t. Your spin is merely repugnant doublespeak.
Returning to the issue at hand: “Either primordial slime magically changed into dinosaurs, then into tumble bugs, fish, humming birds, apes, and then finally man, or it did not. If it did, then your claim of ‘unchanged behavior’ is sheer nonsense. Unchanged? From what?! From that of slime? Seaweed? Lizards?”
Your counter-attack is understandable. If I believed my ancient ancestors were slime, bugs, fish, and other such superstitious nonsense, I suspect I would be as defensive as you so obviously are. On the whole however, by your defensive nonresponse you have conceded the argument quite nicely.
You simply do not get the Christian view of morality in the slightest. If you think you do, you are so wrong it makes my head spin to think how much you don't get it.
If you want me to explain I am willing to try, but first you will have to seriously pledge to avoid dogmatic assertions of your own religious doctrines and open your mind a bit. It may take a while for you to understand, as you are quite obviously hard wired to reject super naturalistic views without any consideration.
...Now that sounds arrogant on my behalf, and I regret that it does. But I am just honestly calling it as I see it.