[Fu-fu2]

“If just 50% of Proft and Brady voters could have been moved to an acceptable Conservative alternative, a Conservative would be winning right now.”

And by that reasoning, if enough Adam and Brady voters had moved to an acceptable Conservative alternative, Proft would be winning.

If the Adam, Brady and Proft voters are a higher percentage than the winner, that sends a message. Next time, we all need to get behind a single candidate.

[TitansAFC]

-—”And by that reasoning, if enough Adam and Brady voters had moved to an acceptable Conservative alternative, Proft would be winning.

If the Adam, Brady and Proft voters are a higher percentage than the winner, that sends a message. Next time, we all need to get behind a single candidate.”-—

Welcome to voting age. We’ve been doing this in every IL election for decades.

Your logic is as flawed as Nader claiming Gore cost him the election. That’s not how it works. You get behind the guy with the best chance to win who is acceptably Conservative.

People just never learn - the Brady-cude voters, and now Proft, who NEVER HAD A CHANCE, EVER.

[mlizzy]

If the Adam, Brady and Proft voters are a higher percentage than the winner, that sends a message. Next time, we all need to get behind a single candidate.

Most definitely. I've heard that Proft and Adam are both good men. I'm afraid I don't know that much about Brady, but, yes, why are all these three running? Why not get their heads together and choose just one? Adam had that wonderful endorsement from Lech Walesa. And from the Bella star as well. And he's got the higher numbers of the three currently. I wish Proft and Brady would have pulled out and asked their voters to support Adam. This is tough to watch.