Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Alito's Candid Response To Obama's Rebuke
The Washington Post ^ | 2/1/10 | E. J. Dionne

Posted on 02/01/2010 9:33:43 AM PST by steve-b

The nation owes a substantial debt to Justice Samuel Alito for his display of unhappiness over President Obama's criticisms of the Supreme Court's recent legislation -- excuse me, decision -- opening our electoral system to a new torrent of corporate money.

Alito's inability to restrain himself during the State of the Union address brought to wide attention a truth that too many have tried to ignore: The Supreme Court is now dominated by a highly politicized conservative majority intent on working its will, even if that means ignoring precedents and the wishes of the elected branches of government.

Obama called the court on this, and Alito shook his head and apparently mouthed "not true." His was the honest reaction of a judicial activist who believes he has the obligation to impose his version of right reason on the rest of us.

The controversy also exposed the impressive capacity of the conservative judicial revolutionaries to live by double standards without apology.

The movement's legal theorists and politicians have spent more than four decades attacking alleged judicial abuses by liberals, cheering on the presidents who joined them in their assaults. But now, they are terribly offended that Obama has straightforwardly challenged the handiwork of their judicial comrades.

There is ample precedent for Obama's firm but respectful rebuke of the court. I know of no one on the right who protested when President Ronald Reagan, in a 1983 article in the Human Life Review, took on the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision of 10 years earlier....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama; obamedia; stevebzot; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 02/01/2010 9:33:43 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Perhaps the Compost should willfully submit to the government regulating what it can and cannot publish.


2 posted on 02/01/2010 9:34:47 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

OMG! no matter how many times you see it, it is still incredible how liberals can take something so back-asswards


3 posted on 02/01/2010 9:36:39 AM PST by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Or they are part of the few remaining in Wash. that understand a separation of powers and that they do not dance for him. No matter how kingly he thinks himself to be.

And, they can recognize a lie when they hear it.


4 posted on 02/01/2010 9:36:46 AM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Good for the Honorable Judge Alito.


5 posted on 02/01/2010 9:37:14 AM PST by Diogenesis ( Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

E.J. Dionne doesn’t live on the same planet as the rest of us.


6 posted on 02/01/2010 9:37:28 AM PST by mbarker12474 (If thine enemy offend thee, give his childe a drum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

This guy is an idiot. The court fixed McCain-Feingold.


7 posted on 02/01/2010 9:38:38 AM PST by isthisnickcool (GIVE ME YOUR MONEY B***!! - President Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
no matter how many times you see it, it is still incredible how liberals can take something so back-asswards

Once you start looking through the lens of a biblical worldview, the leftist/liberal way of looking at things (based on the lies of the enemy) actually makes a sort of "sense" in that you can ask yourself "what's the opposite of truth/reality" and come to the same conclusion as the liberal would.

8 posted on 02/01/2010 9:38:44 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Two words: free speech

Two more words: Roe vs Wade


9 posted on 02/01/2010 9:38:47 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

where is the asshole alert


10 posted on 02/01/2010 9:40:26 AM PST by The Wizard (I support Madam President, the only President in America today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
honest reaction of a judicial activist who believes he has the obligation to impose his version of right reason on the rest of us.

Isn't this what the liberal judges have been doing for 50 years to us???

11 posted on 02/01/2010 9:40:48 AM PST by red tie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Perhaps the Compost should willfully submit to the government regulating what it can and cannot publish.

The Post has a conflict of interest, because now they'll face competition. I'm sure they liked the old unconstitutional way better.

12 posted on 02/01/2010 9:41:28 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Puke. It is jaw-dropping that Libs think Alito was rude to show a very restrained response to BO’s rude and threatening behavior. I wish all the justices would have walked out. It does bother me that that the justices would feel any pressure from the White House and clearly there is tension there. Why the hell don't they just listen to one, just one, case concerning BO’s natural born status?
13 posted on 02/01/2010 9:42:33 AM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
I know of no one on the right who protested when President Ronald Reagan, in a 1983 article in the Human Life Review, took on the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision of 10 years earlier....

Typical disingenuous lying sack of crap liberal.

The problem was NOT that he took exception to the ruling. The problem was the rude, low class behavior. The SCOTUS was there by invitation and O Bama set them up for Shumer and the Rats to publicly taunt them.

Low life scum.

14 posted on 02/01/2010 9:42:43 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (:: The government will do for health care what it did for real estate. ::)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

15 posted on 02/01/2010 9:42:59 AM PST by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
even if that means ignoring the wishes of the government.

What

the f*$@????!!!!

16 posted on 02/01/2010 9:45:25 AM PST by teenyelliott (www.thewaterrock.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

All three branches show up for the SOTU address as a sign of respect and national unity of purpose.

Insulting the SCOTUS - who sit on their hands during every SOTU address out an abundance of caution in order to avoid any judicial hand-tipping or co-mingling or subordination of branches - during this address is simply rude and unprecedented.


17 posted on 02/01/2010 9:45:58 AM PST by Notwithstanding (Wer glaubt ist nie allein. Who believes is never alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act...George Orwell

Excellent quote!

18 posted on 02/01/2010 9:47:40 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
The Supreme Court is now dominated by a highly politicized conservative majority intent on working its will, even if that means ignoring precedents and the wishes of the elected branches of government.

Oh, now that's rich.

Call us when you're ready to scrap Roe v. Wade, E.J.

19 posted on 02/01/2010 9:48:32 AM PST by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Wow. Obama is a scorched earth politician. If you lie in the way, he and his minions will work to destroy you. Even if you are the Supreme Court - a branch of government equal in power and stature to the Executive Branch. I’d like to see a little more focus by GOP pundits on pointing out this approach.


20 posted on 02/01/2010 9:49:38 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson