Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ronbo1948

And the fact that you and your ilk “rejoice” in Tiller’s death tells more about you than you’re willing to admit, and it’s not a pretty picture. Tiller was a vile human being, but make no mistake—he was performing a LEGAL procedure, and the fact that you celebrate someone who went outside the law and murdered him in a house of God tells me your motives are not God’s motives. Deal with that little tidbit. You have done the pro-life movement no favors.


50 posted on 01/29/2010 10:52:08 AM PST by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: OCCASparky

Legal doesn’t equal moral. It was “legal” in this country to keep human beings in bondage, too.


59 posted on 01/29/2010 10:57:39 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: OCCASparky
Can we please not use the term “house of God” when talking about this or like instituitons that condone and sacntion the killing of the unborn? God does NOT reside there! God does not sanction or otherwise endorse ABORTION, HOMOSEXUALITY or the ORDINATION of said HOMOSEXUALS. God? What god is it that you are speaking of here?
66 posted on 01/29/2010 11:01:44 AM PST by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: OCCASparky
And the fact that you and your ilk “rejoice” in Tiller’s death tells more about you than you’re willing to admit, and it’s not a pretty picture.

What isn't pretty is that anyone would not celebrate the death of a monster -- no matter how it occurred -- that killed tens of thousands of fully-formed, perfectly health infants for reasons not related to the health of the mother.

And, no, that isn't an endorsement of Roeder's actions.

His death should be just as much a reason to rejoice as the death Osama Bin Laden or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Only those with no respect for human life would not feel that way.

76 posted on 01/29/2010 11:11:29 AM PST by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: OCCASparky

[he was performing a LEGAL procedure]

No, he wasn’t. The abortions he was performing were on perfectly healthy, viable infants and they WERE NOT LEGAL in the state of Kansas. However, he had used his blood money to buy himself protection and political clout. He owned our Governor, Kathleen Sebelius and took out the state attorney general, Phil Kline, who dared to enforce the law.

http://law.findlaw.com/state-laws/abortion/kansas/


83 posted on 01/29/2010 11:14:53 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: OCCASparky

“he was performing a LEGAL procedure”

So was Mengelez. And Hitler.


141 posted on 01/29/2010 12:01:01 PM PST by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: OCCASparky
I challenge the statement that Tiller was in God`s house!

If the people of that Church shared Dr Tiller`s values (we know they did) then the Spirit of Christ was not in that Church.

My personal opinion on this is that many people are very dishonest when it comes to this subject. They know that if they say as I am saying they will be savagely ripped to pieces, so they hold back.

When Herod died, Joseph and Mary and all with them, gave thanks to God and returned to their home.

Somewhere sometime, we will hear the testimony of someone that was to be aborted by Dr Tiller the following week, perhaps on a Christian television show etc. The death of Dr Tiller was a serious blow to the pro abortion movement.

You can be sure he will not be greeted as Dr when he reaches his final destination.

What if it had been a guy shooting children in a hospital nursery or a daycare? The place would have been surrounded, probably police snipers would take the guy out.

What do you suppose Jesus would have said or done had he came across an abortion clinic? We all know the answer, he would have done something!

I am not going to condemn this poor man, he forfeited his life, and like him or not, crazy or not, he saved lives.

215 posted on 01/29/2010 1:16:10 PM PST by Friendofgeorge ( SARAH PALIN or BUST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: OCCASparky

Absolutely true.

Big, big difference between stopping a murderer in the act and yourself murdering someone who has performed legally authorized activities (whether you agree with the legality or not), and who wasn’t doing anything at the time he was shot.

Murder is not civil disobedience. Murder is not a morally acceptable response because, as others have noted on this topic, it can become quite the slippery slope deciding whose performance of legally authorized acts might yield an innocent death. Extremists on the other side could just as easily argue that the assassination of George W. Bush would have been appropriate using the same vile “logic.”


222 posted on 01/29/2010 1:39:01 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: OCCASparky

I didn’t think that late term abortions were legal. For me, how a “doctor” could take a full term baby apart, and not be charged with murder is unbelievable. That truly is murder in the first degree.
I, for one, am so glad he can’t kill any more babies.
Good he’s gone.


227 posted on 01/29/2010 1:57:30 PM PST by Jennikins (It matters not what we want, as we are being ruled, not governed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: OCCASparky

“Tiller was a vile human being, but make no mistake—he was performing a LEGAL procedure,...”

So were the Nazi concentration camp guards and officers...but, it was recognized by the world that Natural Law transcends national law and that the Right to Life is universal. Hence, the Nazi’s violated a higher law and were able to be prosecuted for committing what was otherwise a legal act (in their country). Our nation’s shame is not in recognizing the violation of law being done everyday in the bowels of abortion clinics killing millions of babies every year.


342 posted on 01/30/2010 3:04:19 AM PST by Wpin (I do not regret my admiration for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: OCCASparky

First of all, just because the law says something is ok doesn’t mean in morally is. Remember, this country is based on Judeo-Christian principles. When slavery was legal, it was still morally wrong. Abortion is legal, but morally wrong. Vigilantism is illegal, but arguably moral.


443 posted on 01/30/2010 6:18:55 PM PST by FutureRocketMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson