Latest ARG Poll...Brown up 3 in Mass!!

http://americanresearchgroup.com/ ^ | 1-16-10 | basalt

[basalt]

the stars are lining up..

http://americanresearchgroup.com/

[benjibrowder]

I wonder if Democrats aren’t in fact rooting for Brown to win at this point and Martha is sabotaging her own campaign so they can do in an electorally poisonous bill. They know they have a bill they don’t think will pass that is turning heavily into electoral poison, if they can’t get it passed by the time Brown sits (if and when he’s elected), then Nancy can play defense with the far left of her base saying that they did everything but Republicans stopped it.

[Grn_Lantern]

Yeah,

That suffrage thing was crap. We need to try to get that amendment out of the constitution...

And what’s with all these women working? Heathens. /s

[unixfox]

And what’s with all these women working? Heathens. /s

Because if they didn't the men couldn't support a family AND pay the taxes.

Answer your question?

[Tonytitan]

And what’s with all these women working? Heathens.

Yeah! A women's place is in the home. Don't they know this? Or could it be that they have simply forgotten. /s

[SmokingJoe]

“everyone forgets the PPP polls was before Scuzzbag endorsed Hoffman..so maybe that changed a bit”

You mean before Scozzafava endorsed Owens. But yeah, that could have changed things a bit.

[MDspinboyredux]

I think we should really resist the temptation of being overly excited about these polls.

The only poll that matters is the one on Election Day.

Continue to work as if you’re 10 points down all the way up until the polls close.

[DeusExMachina05]

With all due respect to Minnasotans, the people of Mass are more in your face and less polite. Stealing an election there would be a harder thing to do if it came to a recount. The Brown supporters are very, very emotionally tied to the guy. Norm Coleman couldnt get anyone excited over him I think.

[GreyMountainReagan]

"The sampling size of the age groups is somewhat concerning. I don’t think 43/57 is likely to be accurate, though it’s apparently a toss up among the older folks..."

If I understand the way polling works the use the results of the polls and the demographics of the responders and normalize the responses across the spectrum of likely voters.

Sometimes this normalization captures the true voter turnout but sometimes it doesn't.

The detailed poll results are not saying that x% will vote only that "of the people we polled x% were women over 45."

[Grn_Lantern]

OIC. Thanks.

[perfect_rovian_storm]

Actually, PPP is pretty reliable if you watch them. One can hardly blame them for botching a poll where one of the major candidates dropped out in the middle of the poll. Check their numbers for NJ and VA. People do themselves a disservice by dismissing them because they are a Dem group or because of NY23.

[Man50D]

I’ve been making calls for Brown since Monday. If my unofficial tally is correct Brown will win by a wide margin.

[Dante3]

Unless there is major voter fraud.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” NO MORE “FORGOTTEN VOTES!

The GOP should be shouting this loud and clear RIGHT NOW!

This blatant election theft tactic is so obvious and in your face that any such ballots should be challenged or declared invalid due to their delivery time.

Hell, any group of thieves could be in a back room cranking these out until they have the required amount....just like the Franken spectacle. “

If we allow Franken redux, we don’t deserve to clean toilets, let alone be in power!

[central_va]

And what’s with all these women working? Heathens. /s>

Your sarcastic remark still doesn't make what I wrote untrue. I still think that. The empirical evidence is there.

[Man50D]

Unless there is major voter fraud.

That amount of voter fraud would reflect a complete breakdown of the voting system to overcome the difference in my tally. Americans will not tolerate such rampant voting fraud and will respond with massive outrage if that occurs.

[crusty old prospector]

You are correct. Women are more easily duped by the hope and change crap. Most of the divorced, single women in my office vote for liberals, hoping for more free daycare or something. I am signing off to go put my flame retardment underwear on.

[central_va]

Yeah! A woman's place is in the home. Don't they know this? Or could it be that they have simply forgotten. /s

My original comment made no judgment to the pro or con of suffrage. My comment is with regard to empirical data. Try reading the election data (pick any state, any election year) with OUT emotion, that is what liberals do.

[SmokingJoe]

PPP has been known reasonably accurate sometimes, yes, but at the same time, they sometimes issue clearly political polls, with clearly political comments, to push a left wing political agenda. There was a recent PPP poll that was posted here on FR, where PPP took it upon themselves to describe Palin supporters as right wing extremists(really annoying a lot of Feepers).
What kind of neutral polling outfit comes up with stupid comments like that included in their poll release?

[perfect_rovian_storm]

I haven’t seen them do anything like that. They are also pretty friendly to conservatives on their site. They even link to FreeRepublic!

Do you have a link to some of this stuff by chance?

[left that other site]

Mom in Boston picked up the phone yesterday.

A familiar voice said: "Hello, This is President Barack Obama"

She hung up! LOL

Mom is an Irish Catholic Democrat, but will be voting for BROWN!