Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latest ARG Poll...Brown up 3 in Mass!!
http://americanresearchgroup.com/ ^ | 1-16-10 | basalt

Posted on 01/16/2010 4:31:46 AM PST by basalt

the stars are lining up..

http://americanresearchgroup.com/


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2010; argpoll; brown; election; elections; ma2010; marthacoakley; massachusetts; poll; scottbrown; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last
To: saganite

We knew that however because with the enrollment edge there’s no way Brown is in the contest without a chunk of Dem votes.


21 posted on 01/16/2010 4:46:20 AM PST by wiggen (Never in the history of our great country have the people had less representation than they do today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

The couple of Dem operatives I know have been very, very quiet about this election. Since one knows the Kennedy family personally, that has me worried.<

I hear ya!


22 posted on 01/16/2010 4:46:32 AM PST by timetostand (Ya say ya wanna revolution -- OK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
If Rasmussen come up with their own poll by Monday, and it’s anything around +3 for Brown as well, then it’s essentially over Coakley.

You're right.

Last several polls

Rasummssen: Coakley +2
PPP: Brown +1
Suffolk: Brown +4
PJM/CT: Brown +15
Coakley internal leak: Brown +3
Brown internal leak: Brown +11
ARG: Brown +3
23 posted on 01/16/2010 4:46:50 AM PST by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kahuna
Brown ahead 58-42 in absentee vote! (9% have voted so far)

I suppose we should expect him to lead here.

Is it easier to cheat on election day or by absentee balloting. (My guess is the latter but I don't really know.)

24 posted on 01/16/2010 4:47:06 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

This is when we’ll see what the patriots of MA are made of. They are going to need steel spines and brass cojones. I think we might all be surprised. I have relatives up there and they are HIGHLY PO’d.


25 posted on 01/16/2010 4:47:10 AM PST by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kahuna
Brown ahead 58-42 in absentee vote! (9% have voted so far)

I suppose we should expect him to lead here.

Is it easier to cheat on election day or by absentee balloting? (My guess is the latter but I don't really know.)

26 posted on 01/16/2010 4:47:29 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: basalt

if women were not allowed to vote I am convinced that there would be no liberals in Congress.


27 posted on 01/16/2010 4:47:33 AM PST by central_va ( http://www.15thvirginia.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

Democrats are no higher then independents. So, it’s good news.


28 posted on 01/16/2010 4:48:26 AM PST by free1977free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

That ain’t good RAS is usually very accurate


29 posted on 01/16/2010 4:49:24 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

This is where the Unions will all take the week off, (With pay) bus the homeless, gather wanderers off the street, escort them into the booth and show them which “X”’s to punch. And, be totally allowed to do so. And then there is ACORN.......


30 posted on 01/16/2010 4:49:40 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

in the SUFFOLK poll 3 days ago that really set this all off, the libtards are having a cow about its “1 percent are undecided”...they all say this cant be true....that 1 percent undecided tells me people are pissed. Obama going there Sunday ..hes gonna try to get the blacks out to vote...get ready for the “negro dialect to really come out. However, his appearance is only gonna get the pissed off more pissed off...Brown wins by 6. You heard it here first!..lol


31 posted on 01/16/2010 4:51:01 AM PST by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
angry homosexuals

Isn't that redundant?

32 posted on 01/16/2010 4:52:08 AM PST by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

And the way to beat such thievery is through overwhelming numbers. The patriots in MA are up to the task, I think.


33 posted on 01/16/2010 4:52:46 AM PST by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
My hopes ran so high in NY-23 and were dashed”

NY23 never really had any reputable pollsters. No Rasmussen, no ARG, no Suffolk University poll etc.
NY23 had a PPP poll. They are not the most reliable of pollsters. Plus NY23 had the Republican votes split between Scozzafava and Hoffman.
Plus Scozzafava then took money from Soros and endorsed Owens the Democrat, further taking votes away from Hoffman. Plus the absentee votes had alreday been cast for Scozzafava, before she withdrew from the face, so Hoffman couldn't get those votes. This is quite different from NY23.

34 posted on 01/16/2010 4:52:55 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: basalt

Brown wins by 6. You heard it here first!..lol<

From your lips to God’s ears!!


35 posted on 01/16/2010 4:53:08 AM PST by timetostand (Ya say ya wanna revolution -- OK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Scozzafava is a stinking POS. We could have won that election if not for her.


36 posted on 01/16/2010 4:54:36 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: basalt

You can’t believe all the internet games I’ve been playing with Boston Libs........oh it’s the Good Times!


37 posted on 01/16/2010 4:54:38 AM PST by Sparky1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Yes, I believe the dems can manufacture a small percentage of fake votes needed to throw the election their way, no problem.

If election day results mirror this poll, dems need only create about 1.5% fake votes. That should not be a problem for them at all given their tactics.


38 posted on 01/16/2010 4:55:06 AM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tgusa

We hope......


39 posted on 01/16/2010 4:55:53 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
That ain’t good RAS is usually very accurate

Right. That's why I said we need to see RAS's new one which will be out soon (Monday).

The Rassmussen one showing it basically dead even (Coakley +2) was taken before any of the other ones showing Brown in lead. But it had Brown trneding up, as Scott's earlier poll had Brown down 9.

So the mojo is clearly with Scott Brown. I just hope he hasn't peaked too soon. The libs are hitting him hard and heavy this wekend with non stop negative ads (Bush Cheney blah blah blah)
40 posted on 01/16/2010 4:56:20 AM PST by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson