Posted on 01/16/2010 4:31:46 AM PST by basalt
the stars are lining up..
http://americanresearchgroup.com/
PPP polling ADMITS to being a democrat leaning firm and if you look at the links and read the blogs from their own site you would clearly see this.
>> Coakley takes Boston but Brown carries the rest of the state <<
What about Northampton? Isn’t that place sorta the “lesbian capitol” of the USA?
Scozz threw a monkey wrench into the works at the end and the Democrats really unloaded on Hoffman the last few days of the 23 campaign. Owens I believe will be beaten this Nov.
Also, with regard to Democrat cheating, I wonder whether it’s harder to manufacture votes in a New England state since they are organized (and, I presume, the votes are counted) by town/city rather than by county. Any ideas about that theory? Still, I suppose votes could be manufactured in Boston and other cities that are D strongholds.
I believe we need a work requirement as well as a requirement that one not receive more than 50% of their income from government sources.
>> I predict that if he wins . . . he’ll become another one of the hated Senate RINOS. <<
Sure, but so what?
Why do you want to accentuate the negative?
Just look for at least three very positive effects if Brown wins, or even if he simply comes very close:
1. Dhimmis from sea to shining sea will be seriously shaken and therefore will moderate their radical leftwing agendas. No cap and tax, no card check, no big tax increases, maybe even no Øbummercare.
2. Excellent ‘Pub candidates — who otherwise might never enter the 2010 races — will be energized to run and may defeat a number of incumbent “safe” Dhimmi congresscritters.
3. An enthused ‘Pub base will contribute more dollars and more volunteer hours than otherwise they might to the cause of defeating Dhimmis, and they will show up at the polls in Nov. 2010 perhaps like never before.
So take heart and keep on the sunny side!
Don’t forget the presence of Dean Barkley on the MN ballot. He ended up with over 400,000 votes in a race in which Franken was declared the winner by 300 votes (Coleman had a 700-vote lead before the sleazy recount).
There is no one like Barkley, who surely hurt the Pubbies more than the Dems, in the MA race. If anything, Joseph Kennedy will draw votes from old fogie Dems and actually help Brown.
I have two and the way they conduct their lives tends to make me agree with that statement!
So? Who said they weren’t? What’s your point?
It had better be a 10 point lead to start feeling there is a chance. This is Mass.
I would feel better with a 20 point lead and Coakley pulling a Harry Reid.
That’s how I see it.
Franken’s people managed to steal about 1000 votes, tops, to turn Coleman’s 700-vote lead into a 300-vote Franken “win” after the recount. That represented a tiny percentage of the overall vote.
There was an election in Washington a few years ago in which something like 5000 votes were “found” for the Dems in Seattle. But even that many would be a drop in the bucket if Brown could win by 3%.
Then why are the most outspoken conservative voices on the national front nowadays WOMEN?
I keep reading different numbers for the split in voter registration between R/D/I. The most common seems to be 10%R, 40%D, 50% other. If that’s right, here’s how I would see the outcome, based on all the polls I’ve seen:
100% of Rs = 10%
20% of Ds = 8%
65% of Is = 32.5%
Total for Brown = 50.5%. If Kennedy gets two or three percent, that leaves a three or four point win for Brown.
You are right.
We have some people here who are either paranoid or attempting to sow discord.
ACORN and SEIU are vastly overrated. They were called upon to disrupt the tea parties and townhalls and they failed miserably. The main thing they managed to accomplish was to get themselves arrested for attacking that Gladney fellow in Saint Louis. They can do some things for the Dems in places like Chicago and possibly Ohio but MA is really not their bailiwick.
I think you and I both have explained the facts here about the Coleman-Franken debacle.
The Haitians aren’t so reliable for the Dhimmis as some people think.
Once established here, many display entrepreneurial talents and become small business people. It was in 2000, I believe, that Haitian precints in Miami split pretty much down the line between AlGore and W, as did Dade County as a whole.
Other than being somewhat pro-choice, you identify Brown as a RINO because...??
I think read that the registered voter breakdown in Mass is:
51% Independent
37% Dem
12% Repub
The best news is that Independents are motivated to vote, and Scott is winning this group by huge numbers. Combine them with motivated Repubs and double digit support from disgruntled Dems and Scott wins by a healthy and uncontestable margin.
I doubt it makes much difference. The corruption has to penetrate down to the nitty-gritty, precinct level to make fraud possible. If a jurisdiction is a one-party kleptocracy elections in that jurisdiction will be rigged. It doesn't much matter how big or small the jurisdiction is.
Nina Easton was griping on Fox News last night that MA never, ever elects a woman to the US Senate and they won’t this time either.
She didn’t seem impressed with Coakley but she was not happy about the all-male senate brigade from the Bay State either.
Oh my.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.