Posted on 01/11/2010 12:47:03 PM PST by Red Steel
It is my best guess that Obamas attorneys figured that once Judge Carter dismissed it was over far from it! Orly has come back with a strong offense. For sure the Justice Department (Obama, et al) is doing its best to stop Judge Carter from approving the transfer to Judge Lamberth in Washington DC. Orly filed a nice response to their opposition.
Below are some highlighted excerpts from the filing:
Orly has pointed out that Judge Carter promised to hear the case on its merits. The Justice Department defending Obama conned the Judge into dismissing and used the excuse of jurisdiction claiming only Quo Warranto can be brought in Washington DC.
Orly said, fine, lets move the case. She is asking Judge Carter to move the case to Judge Lamberths court in DC. This would serve to best expedite the case, including discovery.
Orly is making sure that Judge Carter is aware of the fact that the Justice Department and Eric Holder have been stalling for many months now. An original Quo Warranto was filed in Judge Taylors Washington DC court (he has since retired.. couldnt stand the heat in my opinion).. that was back in March, 2009. The Justice Department has done everyting in its power to stall, hide, ignore the case..
Orly is telling the Judge that the longer he waits to allow we the people to seek justice in court the more damage that Obama does to our Country. The Justice Department is basically defending a Usuper in office.. the entire system appears to be corrupt.. of course, Eric Holder is simply a puppet for Obama.
We hope and pray that Judge Carter allows this case to be transferred.. Obama will have a much tougher time getting the case dismissed in Washington DC if Carter allows the transfer.. Any kind of ruling against Obama will set a precedent that could literally force the Court into action.
WOW, there must have been some "firework" going up while I was absent for a while!!!
No, actually it was pretty darned boring, to tell you the truth of the matter. It came to no more than him saying "don't post to me" and me saying "Okay" (in so many words) and going around about four times over again, with him at the end, invoking the mods and Jim.
Kinda stupid, actually, more than anything else...
I took note. The Judiciary is corrupt too. CO
Forget ALL of the BULL$hit and excuses. The man REFUSES to release ANYTHING ABOUT HIMSELF. That makes him FRAUD in my book. He’s a blank slate and the POTUS should NEVER be a blank slate. NOW you see what you got by buying into a blank slate - PURE EVIL. Enjoy. It can only get worse. CO
Forget ALL of the BULL$hit and excuses. The man REFUSES to release ANYTHING ABOUT HIMSELF.
Well, it's not that he refuses to release "anything" but that he refuses to release some of the information that some people are requesting and release information from some source documents that some people are requesting. That's a whole lot different than he's not releasing anything.
I'm only making that distinction because someone else could easily refute your statement that he "refuses to release anything about himself"... if you see what I mean.
And yes, I know what it being requested to be released from some people... I've seen the list... but you've got a problem here... and that is that it's not a legal requirement that he release it.
Furthermore, at the present time, you've got a "further problem" with it -- in that he's already been elected and he's already the President, so that puts this kind of request "further behnd the eight-ball in terms of ever getting it to be released.
Under the present circumstnaces, it's not going to happen.... and thus... people are continually faced with this repeating scnario...
All you're doing is like a dog running around in a circle, chasing its tail. He never catches his tail (unless he's super limber... LOL...).
And that's the situation....
So, the question is, "How does one break out of this continuing and repeating (forever) scenario?"
Well, you could get a law passed that requires these things to be released to the public, but I sorta doubt that you're going to have a law that covers some of these things.
About the only law that I see which is possible to pass is one that I've mentioned since right after the election. It would be to pass a state law that makes it mandatory for a candidate to release his birth certificate or else he cannot be on the ballot in that state.
The birth certificate is about the only thing I can see that the general public would rally around (the larger voting electorate) as it would apply to all candidates and it has information specifically related to the three requirements of the Constitution.
As for the other stuff, well.... you can try that scenario until "Kingdom Come" -- but I don't think you're going to get any results...
NOW you see what you got by buying into a blank slate - PURE EVIL.
You were probably referring to the "you" in the generic and larger public sense.... I would imagine, and that would be true, for the larger voting public, as 10 million more voted for Obama than the GOP ticket.
As for "me" specifically, even though I get the same President as everyone else does -- I didn't vote for him but rather the GOP ticket.
But, just to let you know, there were significant numbers of people who could have voted for the GOP ticket that did not do so and thus are partly responsible for getting Obama into office.
I might make mention of those here on this thread, who also maintain that McCain was not qualified under the Constitution to be President, just like they say Obama was not -- and they did not vote for the GOP ticket, either. [i.e., in the same manner, as McCain was not a "natural born citizen" -- that's not my argument but theirs, so I don't argue that about McCain... :-) ...]
So, there are many who rejected Obama, who also rejected McCain, which also enabled Obama's supporters to gain the majority in the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.