Posted on 12/27/2009 5:04:46 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, December 27th, 2009
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich.; Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.; Sens. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., Arlen Specter, D-Pa., Richard Shelby, R-Ala., and Jim DeMint, R-S.C.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): White House press secretary Robert Gibbs; New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga.; Gov. Deval Patrick, D-Mass.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Gibbs; Reps. James Clyburn, D-S.C., and Peter King, R-N.Y.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano; Gibbs; Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano; Andrew Card, former Bush White House chief of staff; John Podesta, former Clinton White House chief of staff and head of the Center for American Progress; Govs. Mitch Daniels, R-Ind., and Ed Rendell, D-Pa.; George Evans, mayor of Selma, Ala.
Is she saying this as a host or a guest? As a host, this is blatant editorializing. But what else should one expect from NBC?
Deval thinks we need to be about the “greater good.”
And people are just angry because of the economy.
I missed Bloomberg this morning - thanks for sharing...
Laura Ingraham - There are only 4,000 people on the no-fly list. (Did not know it was that few!)
Juan - It’s not fair after the fact to finger-point, second guess. Says we have no “proof” this was connected to Al Queida. Wow, his head is way down in that sand.
Krystol - The dude is not being interrogated, he’s lawyered up....that’s a real problem if you’re trying to keep ahead of the terrorist.
She is on the panel.
Are there any that haven't?
Referring to terror attacks around the country he said the only thing we can say about them "since we have not formed a message about how to even talk about terrorism" is that:
THEY WERE NOT ROTARIANS
I Fell out of my chair when he said that, classic Newt just too good.
Of course Gregory went right to Annnnddddrrreeeeaaaa Mitchel for the administration take and she made up some pap about how zero's Obama doctrine is not quite finished yet, even more puke inducing pap from the
Newt thinks that we can’t just say “no.” He’s wrong. Right now we will settle for that. Then we’ll take on the work of cleaning out this government.
follow the money,
how many democrats have invested in these companies?
how many democrats have invested in insurance companies?
how much have insurance companies paid to BUY these senators in order to have make a law mandating citizens have to buy their product?
again, this is a follow the money issue.
(of course with so many insurance commercials, no way is the government MSM going to investigate or report this)
I’ll tell you what Andrea Mitchell can do. She can go to another Sarah Palin book signing but this time bring my book I got for Christmas and get it signed for me, instead of trying to waylay Sarah with the stupid Newsweak story.
I’m sure Sarah would appreciate Mitchell doing something useful for a change!
You can just see Andrea and David kinda try and hide under the desk every time Newt speaks since they know he will slice and dice their side into fine sushi in a heartbeat and he scares them to death.
Andrea thinks that anger is just not American.
I wonder if the men with muskets on the bridge at Concord were feeling like reaching out to the British.
My recollection is that they were very, very angry.
White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel recently dismissed critics of the proposed bills by saying that legislation is not made by “people sitting in the shade at the Aspen Institute.” That may be the understatement of the year; these bills overflow with special interest giveaways.
Instead of containing costs, Congress is building support for the bills by institutionalizing the waste. Doctors get deals to lock in existing reimbursement formulas. Labor and consumer groups keep free health care, without any meaningful patient contribution. Trial lawyers veto malpractice reform.
Why do we think Congress will stand up to special interests tomorrow when it refuses to do so today?
I hope you saw the picture of rat faced Andrea “confronting” Sarah with the magazine cover. LOL. It was hilarious.
I’ve said it over and over. Politics is all about power and money, usually both. This is no exception.
From the Muppet old men on cspan, I just heard a new criticism that might become a mantra:
“I can remember when the Senate only needed 51 votes.” (Used to excuse Obama’s lack of progress on his campaign promises.)
Their recommendation: Change the Senate rules; aka, it’s the Republicans’ fault.
When a caller attacked “Wall Street”, their recommendation was - you guessed it - MORE government regulation.
As for -c-spam, the left has taken it over as just another MSNBC. I think there is a serious funding problem there., C-spam gets money from other nets and its beginning to show.
I’ll have to catch that later today once it’s posted online.
Newt ‘can’ be good on occasion. He’s just not consistent.
“Andrea says Ozero has united the world behind the US. LOL.”
Andrea, you ignorant slut.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2415651/posts
Obama’s lost face
American Thinker ^ | December 27, 2009 | J.R. Dunn
Shocking. We heard not one word of that all year, and now THIS coming out of their mouths ! (Chrissy, Norah O'Donnel, Howard Feinman, New Yorker - Heileman ? + one other ?)
I sense a tide is turning. They're expecting some corrections from Obie (and won't find them), just like William Daley's shocking warning to Obie this past week.
HA ! They think '09 was bad for Obie
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.