Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Avatarocious (Another spectacle hits an iceberg and sinks. )
The Weekly Standard ^ | 28 Dec 2009 | John Podhoretz

Posted on 12/21/2009 1:27:57 PM PST by AreaMan

Avatarocious
Another spectacle hits an iceberg and sinks.


by John Podhoretz
12/28/2009, Volume 015, Issue 15


Avatar
Directed by James Cameron

Avatar, we are told, does things with cameras and computers and actors that have never been done before. Its painstaking combination of real-life action and animation has, we are told, taken cinema to a new level. It cost anywhere from $328 million to $500 million, we are told, and took four years to make. It is a breakthrough, we are told, the boldest step into the future of filmmaking, an unparalleled achievement.

What they didn't tell us is that Avatar is blitheringly stupid; indeed, it's among the dumbest movies I've ever seen. Avatar is an undigested mass of clichés nearly three hours in length taken directly from the revisionist westerns of the 1960s-the ones in which the Indians became the good guys and the Americans the bad guys. Only here the West is a planet called Pandora, the time is the 22nd century rather than the 19th, and the Indians have blue skin and tails, and are 10 feet tall.

An American soldier named Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) is sent to make friends with the blue people. To effect this, scientists download his consciousness into a 10-foot-tall blue body. Jake discovers that the natives are wonderful in every possible way. They are so green it's too bad their skin has to be blue. They're hunters and they kill animals, but after they do so, they cry and say it's sad. Which only demonstrates their superiority. Plus they have (I'm not kidding) fiber-optic cables coming out of their patooties that allow them to plug into animals and control them. Now, that just seems wrong-I mean, why should they get to control the pterodactyls? Why don't the pterodactyls control them? This kind of biped-centrism is just another form of imperialist racism, in my opinion.

Like the Keebler elves, the Blue People all live in a big tree together and they go to church at another big tree, under which (we learn) lives Mother Earth, only since it isn't earth, she isn't called Mother Earth, but the Great Mother or something like that. Meanwhile, back among the humans at their base camp, there's a big fight. The scruffy scientists, led by Sigourney Weaver, want to learn, learn, learn about the wonders of the planet and the people and Mother Earth and the big tree and the pterodactyls. But the scientists work for an evil corporation (natch) and the evil corporation is only there because it wants-you can write the rest; but I will, just for the sake of expedience-to exploit the planet's natural resources. In particular, it wants to exploit a mineral called (again no kidding) unobtainium. And it turns out there's a big deposit of unobtainium under the Keebler Elf Tree. They want the elves to move.

Getting them to move is Jake Sully's job. And he does earn their trust, even though the leader of their tribe says, "His alien scent offends my nose!" (The line is translated from their nonexistent language with subtitles that are designed to look like the men's room signs at an Indian casino.) The Blue People, in particular the contemptuous and lovely Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), show him their wondrous ways. But before he can discuss hiring Allied Van Lines with them, the Evil Corporation intervenes.

It is run by an evil Yuppie, and the Yuppie's security is provided by an evil Marine. And for no good reason other than to get the movie into its second act, they decide to stage a military attack on the Elf Tree, thus blowing the zillions of dollars they sank into the project of making Jake Sully into a Blue Person rather than waiting a couple of weeks.

Oy, the suffering that ensues, all for some lousy unobtainium! Oy, the destruction! You can hear writer-director James Cameron weeping over his special-effects computer as the bad humans he created commit this terrible atrocity against the Blue People who don't exist. As for me, I was reminded of Oscar Wilde's immortal crack about Charles Dickens's tears as he killed off the child heroine of his Old Curiosity Shop: "It would take a heart of stone to read the death of Little Nell without laughing."

The only salvation for Pandora lies with our man Jake Sully turning into the leader of the blue-skinned people, rallying them to the cause of protecting their planet against the Evil Corporation. This, too, is unacceptably paternalistic, in my view; after all, why should giant blue people have to learn these things from a shrimpy white guy who doesn't even have a tail or built-in Skype?

Eventually, it falls to Jake to plug his fiber-optic cables into a plant and ask the Great Mother to do something. And she does. She rallies the pterodactyls, not to mention some rhinoceroses and dogs, to join with an army of blue people to take down the EC. In the end, it's Jake Sully vs. the Evil Marine, who is dressed up to look like (again, not kidding) a Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Robot, one of those ludicrous toys from the late 1960s that gave toys a bad name.

You're going to hear a lot over the next couple of weeks about the movie's politics-about how it's a Green epic about despoiling the environment, and an attack on the war in Iraq, and so on. The conclusion does ask the audience to root for the defeat of American soldiers at the hands of an insurgency. So it is a deep expression of anti-Americanism-kind of.

The thing is, one would be giving James Cameron too much credit to take Avatar-with its mindless worship of a nature-loving tribe and the tribe's adorable pagan rituals, its hatred of the military and American institutions, and the notion that to be human is just way uncool-at all seriously as a political document. It's more interesting as an example of how deeply rooted these standard-issue counterculture clichés in Hollywood have become by now. Cameron has simply used these familiar bromides as shorthand to give his special-effects spectacular some resonance. He wrote it this way not to be controversial, but quite the opposite: He was making something he thought would be most pleasing to the greatest number of people.

Will it be? Aside from the anti-American, anti-human politics, the movie is nearly three hours long, and it doesn't have a single joke in it. There is no question that Avatar is an astonishing piece of work. It is, for about two-thirds of its running time, an animated picture that looks like it's not an animated picture.

On the other hand, who cares? It doesn't count for much that the technical skill on display makes it easier to suspend disbelief and make you think you're watching something take place on a distant planet. Getting audiences to suspend disbelief isn't the hard part; we suspend disbelief all the time. It's how we can see any movie about anything and get involved in the story. The real question is this: If Avatar were drawn like a regular cartoon, or had been made on soundstages with sets and the like, would it be interesting? Would it hold our attention? The answer is, unquestionably no. There's no chance anybody would even have put it into production, no matter that Cameron made the box-office bonanza Titanic. So the question is: Does the technical mastery on display in Avatar outweigh the unbelievably banal and idiotic plot, the excruciating dialogue, the utter lack of any quality resembling a sense of humor? And will all these qualities silence the discomfort coming from that significant segment of the American population that, we know from the box-office receipts for Iraq war movies this decade, doesn't like it when an American soldier is the bad guy?

John Podhoretz, editor of Commentary,is THE WEEKLY STANDARD's movie critic.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: avatar; culture; hollywood; moviereview; movies; philosophy; podhoretz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last
To: SuziQ

Really a very “deep” movie. Reviewers portrayed him as a racist who sees the light but I don’t think there was any racism there even toward the Hmong. His animosity toward the Hmong was really more about shame and pain over his past.

The other “racism” was simply the way many friends speak to friends or simple terms that were once used pretty commonly.


81 posted on 12/21/2009 3:38:50 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: printhead
“Un-ass that shi*. It’s only a flare.”

Ya, but if they'd had a certain Navy Lt. JG on board, he would have put in for a brace of Purple Hearts.

82 posted on 12/21/2009 3:53:13 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The CRU needs adult supervision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Aka Dances with Smurfs...


83 posted on 12/21/2009 3:54:10 PM PST by piytar (Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Hollywood cries about the poor and homeless then spends half a billion dollars on a fantasy movie.

And they were successful in getting the tax lifted on plastic surgery. That’s the only thing they really cared about in the health care bill.


84 posted on 12/21/2009 3:56:48 PM PST by Terry Mross (It's not racist if it's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

This film doesn’t hate any of those things but that’s beside the point. I was just taking the highest example to demonstrate that you were correct and was wondering what the logical response should be.


85 posted on 12/21/2009 4:29:10 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

An enterprise like this employs thousands of people and stimulates the economy. What does the genre have to do with anything?


86 posted on 12/21/2009 4:30:35 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625; Cicero
According to Reuters, Avatar's weekend is pretty mixed http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2412005/posts?page=66#66.

In addition, from revised article:

Cameron is going to make out like a bandit on this. He will definitely beat Oliver Stone for The 2009 MP Academy Special Leni Riefenstahl Award ("Oscar"). Oliver will come back next year with Wall Street 2.
87 posted on 12/21/2009 4:54:43 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Kieri
Cameron needed a villain so he fell back on the good ol’ “corporate military” standby...

I wouldn't call it 'fall back'. I have no doubt that 'production value' is top-notch ($300M can buy that) and visually stunning (40% "live", 60% CGI / motion capture) but thematically, this is merely a rehash of The Abyss (1989) (also written and directed by Cameron) of twenty years ago, only with an improved technology. It could be relatively subtle, but it's still evil military-industrial-corporate complex vs cute peaceful aliens with advanced technology.

For Cameron, it's not a fall back, it's a main theme and an "Aliens for peace vs America for war" meme.

88 posted on 12/21/2009 5:16:23 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Popman
LOL!

That is my second favorite animated (although the affect is so lifelike I don't understand why they didn't use the real actors) film.

Favorite, number one though, is "Finding Nemo".

89 posted on 12/21/2009 5:32:33 PM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

A MechWarrior movie? Put me down for a Summoner and a Masakari then.


90 posted on 12/21/2009 5:48:13 PM PST by Redcitizen (Zartan for President 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
"Do you have a problem with people of colour?"
91 posted on 12/21/2009 6:02:37 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Life is a tragedy for those who feel, but a comedy to those who think. - Horace Walpole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

I started watching the Russian subtitled version on the internet. It looked interesting, so we went to see it. In spite of the negativity towards it that we read here, we definitely enjoyed it. It was different. Sure I said in the first part; “He’s Lt Dunbar, and they put him in the future”, but it kept our attention for the 2.5 hours. The visual effects were great, when it comes out in DVD we’ll probably pick one up. I liked Blade Runner when it first came out, and still do, even though it wasn’t popular at the time. Even if Avatar was a rerun of a western plot, how many times have we’ve seen Agatha Christy’s 10 little Indians plot?


92 posted on 12/21/2009 6:09:58 PM PST by Bringbackthedraft (This isn't my America any more, where is Mrs Cleaver?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun; Popman
Beowulf is also IMAX 3D and using the same motion capture technology as Avatar, but it has a wonderful story, based on German and Old Norse legends.

It was beautiful to watch, even in 2D on DVD, and it had great dragons and all... I would think dragons without fiber-optic attachments are more realistic.

Makes me wonder what protocol was used in Avatars' FO attachments - FC, FCoE, FireWire, USB, UWB? BTW, with such advanced consciousness level, why didn't they use a variant of high speed wireless USB or pure telepathy?

93 posted on 12/21/2009 6:32:41 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
I started watching the Russian subtitled version on the internet.

Did the same. Don't think many realize there's pirated versions on the net. I don't read Russian so I couldn't understand the subtitles. Will also buy it later when it's heavily discounted.

94 posted on 12/21/2009 7:27:37 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: kaboom

Go see it in IMAX if you can, the REAL 3D version shows compression of the 3d effects and some depth is lost. The IMAX was the best 3d I have ever seen. The also showed previews of upcoming 3d movies...the new shrek movie looks really funny. They also showed a preview of the real life NASA mission to repair the HUBBLE telescope....the real live images from space with the space shuttle in orbit was truly astounding in depth and quality.


95 posted on 12/21/2009 7:41:09 PM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
You have to admit. At least he saw it.
96 posted on 12/21/2009 7:58:04 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Read a book about their Afghan war called “The Forgotten War”.

Had to dig it up and read it again recently. Afghanistan is a game to us, but it was next door to them. Some cross border raids and such.

97 posted on 12/21/2009 8:03:36 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Avatar will be available on DVD and Blu-ray by next April.


98 posted on 12/21/2009 8:04:54 PM PST by upchuck (The plan for 2010: Pray; Raise/conserve cash; Pray; Pay your debts; Pray; Stockpile; Buy ammo; VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Agreed. Gran Torino is an awesome movie. Eastwood is great.


99 posted on 12/21/2009 8:05:43 PM PST by upchuck (The plan for 2010: Pray; Raise/conserve cash; Pray; Pay your debts; Pray; Stockpile; Buy ammo; VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RJL
Yes, we could have Al Gore selling unobtainium futures at $Trillions of personal profit and bribing fellow Dems to invoke eminent domain. Then the closing shows the big government sending men with guns to take away their home tree and imprisoning or killing those who resist big government.

Your novel take reminded me that Alex Jones saw the movie and kinda reviewed it on his radio program on Sunday. Alex is so unpredictable, I can imagine him loving it or despising it. He came down against it for its anti-American military, anti-development message! First time I'd heard that angle!

To summarize and paraphrase, he said what the Corporation was doing was flat wrong, but at least they were being "honest" in their theft by gambling that if the Navi could beat them in their big land grab, they could keep it and toss 'em off the planet.

But he said the Global Eites and Al Gore-types would have been much worse than the Corporation. The Elites would have sent only Avatars to Pandora, ingratiated themselves to the natives, then play the Save the Environment/Save Pandora card by saying the Na'vi were hurting the planet! Yes! And that to save Eywa, all the natives would have to agree to move onto reservations!

Once that was accomplished, then the Elites would send down the military, and the dozers, and the processors to mine and refine Unobtainium for themselves and shoot any natives that left the reservations!

I admit, that was a plan that left my head swimming!

100 posted on 12/21/2009 8:21:48 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson