Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne; Brytani; redstateconfidential; Desdemona; mad_as_he$$; JillValentine; rintense; ...

DoughtyOne, thanks for trying to clarify your cryptic ode.

That’s more than can be said of redstateconfidential, who perhaps doesn’t have a chance to do so any longer (post 64 in this thread?) - at least he’s not made any posts today:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:redstateconfidential/index?brevity=full;tab=comments

Look, perhaps you expected all of us to just ‘get you’ and you’re right, not everyone can understand us always, and certainly not everyone will agree with us.

You wrote “Today, as of this moment on, women should have the right kill anyone they like.” In your explanation you wrote: “Am I not trashing the stupidity of the premise that women should be able to kill the unborn?”

Why couldn’t you have written consistenly with your second sentence, which as you pointed out *doesn’t* single out women?: “I have been intrigued by the trail of little human body parts, leading to the feet of the leftists, their leaders, politicians, and judges.”

As it stands Doughty, most of the rest of your skreed, really seems to be a diatribe against a ‘woman’s right to choose’ - which is worthy to be blasted - but not against those ‘leftists, their leaders, politicians, and judges’, many if not most of whom are MEN.

So if you want to get into such a sophisticated romp as you attempted, that is to blast the pro-death credo of the left, next time I suggest you keep your targets in sight - all of them - MEN and women, and not just narrow down to one portion of the problem - that is the feminist movement (of which there are prominent men (like Alan Alda, et al)), and their call for a woman’s ‘right to choose’ - to kill a human being.

By using just one line at the beginning to address all, and then lowering the double barrels at women, or crptically if we ‘got you’ - liberal women in the feminist movement - you have failed at your efforts.

Again, thanks for your attempt at clarifying, but with all due respect it’s a shame that people have to be driven off the site because of a cryptic rant. Please consider that next time you decide it wise to shoot the rocket launcher.


88 posted on 12/20/2009 10:44:20 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: SeattleBruce

I don’t mind that you disagree, and I’m not trying to be dismissive.

You wouldn’t have posted what I did. You would have posted something different. That’s your style. I support that.

This was my style, and I’ll accept that you think I failed.

Take care.


94 posted on 12/20/2009 12:12:48 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Merry Christmans to all... and to all a good night! (remember the reason for the season))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson