Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remembering Pearl Harbor, and perhaps exploding a myth
Seattle Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 7 December, 2009 | Dave Workman

Posted on 12/08/2009 3:59:54 AM PST by marktwain

Sixty-eight years ago today, Sunday, Dec. 7, 1941 – a date that will live in infamy – the United States was attacked by the Japanese Imperial Navy at Pearl Harbor, at the cost of more than 2,000 lives. My father, who never talked about the war because he was in it, did tell me this once: When he heard about Pearl Harbor “I couldn’t get my hands on a gun fast enough.” It was a different time then in America. It was not unusual to find a Model 94 Winchester or even a bolt-action 1903 Springfield in the average household, especially across the West. There is no polite or diplomatic way to say this: What happened that morning so many decades ago grabbed “the greatest generation” of America by the jugular and really pissed them off. Here was a generation of Americans who had endured the Great Depression as children and still understood that uniquely American “Code of the West.” This was a generation grown up on the imaginary exploits of William S. Hart, Tim McCoy, a new kid named John Wayne, and even the likes of film gangsters George Raft, James Cagney and Humphrey Bogart, all of whom reminded us visually that when someone hits you with a fist, you hit him back with a chair just as hard as you can. There has been considerable debate as to why the

-----------------cut---------------------------

And then there is the unverifiable story that certain Japanese military leaders wanted no truck with a mainland invasion because – and this has been attributed to different people including Admiral Yamamoto – they knew, or at least feared, that there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; examiner; gun; myth; pearlharbor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
All that it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing.
1 posted on 12/08/2009 3:59:55 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Invading Hawaii was impossible because of the supply line. There were still 3 carriers out there not to mention the Atlantic USN fleet. They had to take Midway on order to clear the lanes for Hawaii


2 posted on 12/08/2009 4:03:23 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Don’t forget however, that the “Greatest” generation largely gave us the “Baby Boomer” generation.

You know, the spoiled brats in charge?


3 posted on 12/08/2009 4:15:31 AM PST by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The main reason that there was never an invasion was because as is said in the article. The Japanese were never interested in conquering America for many reasons. It is curious why they never attempted an invasion of Hawaii. It would not have been very difficult but most likely they never expected the level of success they achieved. In actuality, because the carriers were out to sea, they did not achieve as great a victory as it seems to be at first.

Pearl Harbor was the final nail in the coffin of the age of the battleship and we quickly moved into the age of the Aircraft carrier as the dominant naval ship. Where the Japanese hit next shows what they were interested in. To cripple the American fleet so that they could invade Malasia, Phillipines, Thailand et al without reprisal from us. The Japanese’s goal was to control all of Southeast Asia. To colonize them so these countries could feed the Japanese empire their goods (oil, rubber, etc...)


4 posted on 12/08/2009 4:38:28 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

Yes, and the generation XYZ’ers in the 18-30 year olds that put them in charge! Obama’s biggest non racial demographic.


5 posted on 12/08/2009 4:38:46 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I’m one of them (Gen X).

Actually, the largest (non-racial) demographic was the Jewish Vote who went for Obama 72% (heard on Michael Medved radio show yesterday).

18-30 year olds were only 64% for Obama.


6 posted on 12/08/2009 4:43:17 AM PST by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I agree with you. In the case of invading Hawaii I don’t think citizen arms figured much in Japanese calculations. They would have been way over-exposed and over-extended so far from their East Asia center.

I don’t think the Japanese ever had any goal other than knocking out the USN in the Pacific and thus (in their fractured thinking) keeping us out of the war.

The Pearl Harbor attack was a very stupid move on their part and I think I remember reading (I’m no student of the era, just a casual reader) that Hitler tried to dissuade them from it. Do you know if that’s true?


7 posted on 12/08/2009 4:49:22 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
It was not unusual to find a Model 94 Winchester.....in the average household"

My son has his great-grandfather's. Works fine.

8 posted on 12/08/2009 4:52:02 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM
"18-30 year olds were only 64% for Obama."

HITH does that work as an excuse?

9 posted on 12/08/2009 4:54:48 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I don’t care if I’m 104 years old. The concept, in my opinion, is to pile them up outside your house like cordwood. Lat the vultures do the rest.


10 posted on 12/08/2009 4:54:50 AM PST by tenthirteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

It’s not an excuse. It’s a correction.

Actually (to correct myself, according to a Google Search) the Jewish vote was 77-78% (depending on who you ask) for Obama.

There is no excuse for voting for socialism, unless that’s what you want.


11 posted on 12/08/2009 4:57:53 AM PST by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Hitler desperately needed Japan in the war to divert forces in the Soviet Union. Japan needed to hit the US before we got the manufacturing base converted to war. That was already beginning in 1941 because of Lend-Lease.

The real scandal happened in the Philippines where the Japanese were able to wipe out our air assets because they were sitting on the ground, hours after Pearl Harbor happened.


12 posted on 12/08/2009 4:59:22 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Now a question for you.....

How did the “greatest” generation instill their values in their “baby boomer” children, and we get socialism?


13 posted on 12/08/2009 5:01:47 AM PST by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If we had lost the battles at Midway and the Coral Sea they might of eventually taken Hawaii and of been able to contemplate the invasion of the United States. I am looking forward to reading the more knowledgeable posters comments about that. The nightmarish logistics of invading the American mainland would be impossible without a secure supply line. They did demonstrate their willingness to seize US territory in the Philippines if the opportunity presented itself. I am not sure if they would of wanted to overextend themselves with a invasion of the entire mainland. My father was in the Navy and fought the Japanese but felt that the Japanese were fighting a desperate defensive battle after 1942.


14 posted on 12/08/2009 5:04:55 AM PST by dog breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

Half of them got it, half didn’t. Reagan was elected by somebody. Zer0 by others.


15 posted on 12/08/2009 5:07:15 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

Because the march to socialism started before the boomer generation. Read some history.


16 posted on 12/08/2009 5:09:20 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Japan needed to hit the US before we got the manufacturing base converted to war.
Sorry, AppyPappy, I'm not following you on that one.

How does destroying a fleet of Naval vessels in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, shut down or inhibit our manufacturing base in Pittsburg, Detroit, Cleveland, Trenton, Groton, or Richmond (just to name a few)?

The attack had two goals, as I understand it. One was to so cripple our Navy in the Pacific as to basically erase our military presence in the area.

The other was to so intimidate the American people that we would never think of entering the war against Japan.

As it turned out, Japanese thinking was utterly confused on both points.

And I think I remember reading that Hitler had some advance knowledge of the strike and argued against it, because he didn't want the isolationist/interventionist impasse in the US congress to be broken in favor of interventionism.

Yes Hitler wanted Japan to start fighting Russians. But he didn't want the USA to start fighting ANYBODY.

At least that's the way I understand it.

17 posted on 12/08/2009 5:09:32 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dog breath
My father was in the Navy and fought the Japanese but felt that the Japanese were fighting a desperate defensive battle after 1942.
I believe your father was right. I believe that Pearl Harbor was the biggest blunder in the history of warfare.
18 posted on 12/08/2009 5:12:10 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

Yikes 72%.... wonder what it is now>?


19 posted on 12/08/2009 5:12:34 AM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I just wish that many today had the same sense of independence and self-reliance that their (grand-)parents had.

My Grandmother lived through the Depression, and would have much to say about how things have turned wrong.

We have no (collective) sense of history, and don’t heed the lessons. “Fight the Establishment” has now become the Establishment.


20 posted on 12/08/2009 5:13:42 AM PST by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson