Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: Tea Party Tops GOP on Three-Way Generic Ballot
Rasmussen ^ | Dec 07, 2009

Posted on 12/07/2009 5:44:38 AM PST by TomGuy

In a three-way Generic Ballot test, the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds Democrats attracting 36% of the vote. The Tea Party candidate picks up 23%, and Republicans finish third at 18%. Another 22% are undecided.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2009polls; 2010midterms; gop; oldandintheway; rasmussen; rinobubble; rinos; rnc; teapartier; teaparties; teaparty; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-267 next last
To: SeattleBruce

I don’t know.


161 posted on 12/07/2009 8:13:19 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

The short answer is YES, I will vote for any Republican running against any Dimocrat in a GENERAL election. To not do that is unconscionable.


162 posted on 12/07/2009 8:15:01 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma (Al Franken--the face of the third-party voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
"When did “The Tea Party” officially become a U.S. political party? I missed that announcement."

I agree..someone is still trying to be cute in framing the wording.

163 posted on 12/07/2009 8:15:35 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

Voting for GOP candidates who are 10% less socialist than their Dem opponents should be now be a completely discredited strategy, but alas it’s not.
++++++++++++++++

Akin to that, voting for 3rd party candidates with no hope of national electoral success, should be a discredited strategy, but alas it’s not.

Electoral and political success for conservatives will come as we purge the R party of RINOs and pursue populism as reflected in the Tea Party movement.


164 posted on 12/07/2009 8:15:40 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: DManA

You need help.


165 posted on 12/07/2009 8:16:26 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma (Al Franken--the face of the third-party voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Bruce: How should we pursue electoral success?

DManA: I don’t know.

Bruce: Electoral and political success for conservatives will come as we purge the R party of RINOs and pursue populism as reflected in the Tea Party movement.


166 posted on 12/07/2009 8:17:37 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: DManA

The republicans are destructive in their own unique way. They are the same in that they are both destroying the country.
+++++++++++++

Yet you’re telling us you don’t know how to stop that; how to pursue electoral success!


167 posted on 12/07/2009 8:18:51 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The GOP policy once you get past the emotional on camera wedge issues they use to seduce conservatives (united opposition to Obama stimulus and health care) is to get along with the Democrats when the cameras aren’t on them.

The GOP members like the 10 Senators who helped advance a radical left wing judicial nominee (Lamar Alexander and Kay Bailey Hutchinson among them).

My GOP congressman (Todd Platts) who voted for Jack Murtha’s pork so he could get a share for his district.


168 posted on 12/07/2009 8:19:02 AM PST by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Bottom line is that means Obama and the fascists win. This isn’t something to celebrate unless we love Perot.


169 posted on 12/07/2009 8:19:47 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

Sorry grandma...this has been coming for decades. Sorry that you can’t see just how bad things are. If you haven’t cried for your Country in the past few months...you just don’t get it.


170 posted on 12/07/2009 8:19:54 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

ping


171 posted on 12/07/2009 8:20:37 AM PST by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

The lesson for Republicans is obvious. Embody Tea Party issues or go the way of the Whigs.


172 posted on 12/07/2009 8:21:05 AM PST by popdonnelly (Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

**”When did “The Tea Party” officially become a U.S. political party? I missed that announcement.”

—I agree..someone is still trying to be cute in framing the wording.
+++++++++++++++

Right. Let’s look at facts. “In the history of the United States, not a single third party has come close to winning the presidency, only 7 3rd parties have even won a single state’s electoral votes and only 5 third parties have won even 10% of the vote.”

Given that reality, given those facts, how should we pursue electoral success?

One more time for good measure: Electoral and political success for conservatives will come as we purge the R party of RINOs and pursue conservative populism as reflected in the Tea Party movement.


173 posted on 12/07/2009 8:21:45 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Actually, the undecided 22% is probably deciding between Republican & Democrat (these are the moderates) and most likely will tip to the Dem side in a merging of the Tea Party and GOP.. (Tea Party = right wing = anti-moderate)...magritte


174 posted on 12/07/2009 8:22:56 AM PST by magritte ("I will give this monkey for lunch to Mr Sata,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
The short answer is YES, I will vote for any Republican running against any Dimocrat in a GENERAL election.

... regardless (as already conclusively established) of how liberal, socialist or even unappologetically Marxist they may happen to be so far as legalized infanticide; wholesale and unconditional amnesty for tens of millions of illegal immigrants; or punitive, crippling tax rates, to name but three immediate issues, are concerned.

No, no. No need to illustrate further. You've rendered your position more than amply clear already, I assure you.

And then some.

175 posted on 12/07/2009 8:23:09 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (http://www.conservatives4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller; Conservativegreatgrandma

Earthdweller: “Sorry that you can’t see just how bad things are.”

Grandma - aren’t you in favor of purging the R party of RINOs? For instance, don’t you support Rubio over Crist?


176 posted on 12/07/2009 8:23:35 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

The GOP wants to use real conservatives to elect non-conservatives and that has to stop.

The end result is a slower longer death of freedom in this country.

In Canada the conservative people started a third party and it certainly split the vote for a dozen years. But they killed and destoyed the “Progressive Conservative Party” they were protesting.

But Canada is still there after the mess, it wasn’t the end of the world.

The new Conservative Party that came out of it has been in power for several years now.


177 posted on 12/07/2009 8:24:06 AM PST by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
this should elect more democrats divide and conquer is the only way they can win

My first thought too. Although one must take the source into account as well.

178 posted on 12/07/2009 8:24:39 AM PST by prairiebreeze (God bless the Ft. Hood families, victims and soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
The conservative party does not..repeat...does not need to purge anything....we are the GOP in very large numbers. We can accept Republicans as we see fit. They can merge with us at our digression.
179 posted on 12/07/2009 8:24:45 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

You have it backwards...


180 posted on 12/07/2009 8:25:20 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson